The Toms Rock: The Straight Dope On Operation FUBAR

Stories

Brilliant piece:

http://www.tomdispatch.com/index.mhtml?pid=70198 

and

Robert Dreyfuss

http://www.tompaine.com/articles/2006/03/14/deja_vu_all_over_iran.php

Juan Cole on Bush’s Shit Talk about Iranian I.E.D’s

Stories

Truthdig.com

“The guerrillas in Iraq are militant Sunnis who hate Shiites, and it is wholly implausible that the Iranian regime would supply bombs to the enemies of its Iraqi allies.”

Matt Cooper’s Source: REVIEW

Stories

Matt Cooper’s Source
What Karl Rove told Time magazine’s reporter.

By Michael Isikoff

Newsweek
July 18 issue – It was 11:07 on a Friday morning, July 11, 2003, and Time magazine correspondent Matt Cooper was tapping out an e-mail to his bureau chief, Michael Duffy. “Subject: Rove/P&C,” (for personal and confidential), Cooper began. “Spoke to Rove on double super secret background for about two mins before he went on vacation …” Cooper proceeded to spell out some guidance on a story that was beginning to roil Washington. He finished, “please don’t source this to rove or even WH [White House]” and suggested another reporter check with the CIA.

Last week, after Time turned over that e-mail, among other notes and e-mails, Cooper agreed to testify before a grand jury in the Valerie Plame case. Explaining that he had obtained last-minute “personal consent” from his source, Cooper was able to avoid a jail sentence for contempt of court. Another reporter, Judith Miller of The New York Times, refused to identify her source and chose to go to jail instead.

For two years, a federal prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald, has been investigating the leak of Plame’s identity as an undercover CIA agent. The leak was first reported by columnist Robert Novak on July 14, 2003. Novak apparently made some arrangement with the prosecutor, but Fitzgerald continued to press other reporters for their sources, possibly to show a pattern (to prove intent) or to make a perjury case. (It is illegal to knowingly identify an undercover CIA officer.) Rove’s words on the Plame case have always been carefully chosen. “I didn’t know her name. I didn’t leak her name,” Rove told CNN last year when asked if he had anything to do with the Plame leak. Rove has never publicly acknowledged talking to any reporter about former ambassador Joseph Wilson and his wife. But last week, his lawyer, Robert Luskin, confirmed to NEWSWEEK that Rove did—and that Rove was the secret source who, at the request of both Cooper’s lawyer and the prosecutor, gave Cooper permission to testify.

The controversy arose when Wilson wrote an op-ed column in The New York Times saying that he had been sent by the CIA in February 2002 to investigate charges that Iraq was trying to buy uranium from the African country of Niger. Wilson said he had found no evidence to support the claim. Wilson’s column was an early attack on the evidence used by the Bush administration to justify going to war in Iraq. The White House wished to discredit Wilson and his attacks. The question for the prosecutor is whether someone in the administration, in an effort to undermine Wilson’s credibility, intentionally revealed the covert identity of his wife.

While Cooper got a waiver from Rove, The New York Times's Miller (second from left) went to jailIn a brief conversation with Rove, Cooper asked what to make of the flap over Wilson’s criticisms. NEWSWEEK obtained a copy of the e-mail that Cooper sent his bureau chief after speaking to Rove. (The e-mail was authenticated by a source intimately familiar with Time’s editorial handling of the Wilson story, but who has asked not to be identified because of the magazine’s corporate decision not to disclose its contents.) Cooper wrote that Rove offered him a “big warning” not to “get too far out on Wilson.” Rove told Cooper that Wilson’s trip had not been authorized by “DCIA”—CIA Director George Tenet—or Vice President Dick Cheney. Rather, “it was, KR said, wilson’s wife, who apparently works at the agency on wmd [weapons of mass destruction] issues who authorized the trip.” Wilson’s wife is Plame, then an undercover agent working as an analyst in the CIA’s Directorate of Operations counterproliferation division. (Cooper later included the essence of what Rove told him in an online story.) The e-mail characterizing the conversation continues: “not only the genesis of the trip is flawed an[d] suspect but so is the report. he [Rove] implied strongly there’s still plenty to implicate iraqi interest in acquiring uranium fro[m] Niger … “

Nothing in the Cooper e-mail suggests that Rove used Plame’s name or knew she was a covert operative. Nonetheless, it is significant that Rove was speaking to Cooper before Novak’s column appeared; in other words, before Plame’s identity had been published. Fitzgerald has been looking for evidence that Rove spoke to other reporters as well. “Karl Rove has shared with Fitzgerald all the information he has about any potentially relevant contacts he has had with any reporters, including Matt Cooper,” Luskin told NEWSWEEK.

A source close to Rove, who declined to be identified because he did not wish to run afoul of the prosecutor or government investigators, added that there was “absolutely no inconsistency” between Cooper’s e-mail and what Rove has testified to during his three grand-jury appearances in the case. “A fair reading of the e-mail makes clear that the information conveyed was not part of an organized effort to disclose Plame’s identity, but was an effort to discourage Time from publishing things that turned out to be false,” the source said, referring to claims in circulation at the time that Cheney and high-level CIA officials arranged for Wilson’s trip to Africa.

Fitzgerald is known as a tenacious, thorough prosecutor. He refused to comment, and it is not clear whether he is pursuing evidence that will result in indictments, or just tying up loose ends in a messy case. But the Cooper e-mail offers one new clue to the mystery of what Fitzgerald is probing—and provides a glimpse of what was unfolding at the highest levels as the administration defended a part of its case for going to war in Iraq.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8525978/site/newsweek/

Canada already hates us…now this:

Stories

The Prince Of Pot

March 5, 2006


(CBS) His name is Marc Emery and he is called the “Prince of Pot.” He claims to have sold more marijuana seeds than anyone in the world and, to date, no one has disputed that claim. He lives in Vancouver, British Columbia, where the culture is rather permissive concerning marijuana. The Canadian government, for the most part, has left Emery and his business alone.

But to the U.S., he is one of the most wanted men in the drug world. As 60 Minutes correspondent Bob Simon reports, officials in the U.S. government want him extradited to the United States. They want him in an American prison and they want him badly.


Emery believes that marijuana is a wonderful, healing drug and that to criminalize it is just plain silly. To his supporters, he’s a hero, the leader of the marijuana legalization movement. He has even run for mayor of Vancouver, twice.

But to the U.S. government, Marc Emery is a drug kingpin who should be prosecuted in the United States for selling drugs to Americans.

Asked if he has any idea how many of his customers were Americans, Emery says, “Yes, I would think that of the say, 120,000 people I dealt with, I’d say certainly 70,000 would have been Americans.”

That’s why John McKay, the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Washington, wants to bring Emery south, across the border.

Why are the Americans going after Emery, who is a Canadian citizen, and not the Canadian government?

“Well, very simply, he’s a drug dealer,” says McKay. “He’s dealing drugs into the United States and violating laws of the United States and we expect to extradite him and try him in the United States.”

“Are there other Canadians who sort of are competitive with him in terms of volume?” Simon asked.

“Today, to our knowledge, Marc Emery is the biggest purveyor of marijuana from Canada into the United States,” McKay replied.

Well, it’s not exactly marijuana. For over a decade, Marc Emery sold marijuana seeds. Technically, that’s illegal in British Columbia, but no one has ever gotten more than a slap on the wrist for doing it.

Emery’s headquarters since 2002, is a store in Vancouver, which also sells marijuana paraphernalia and the magazine Emery publishes, “Cannabis Culture.” Inside the magazine is a mail order seed catalogue, but not for gardeners.

The catalogue, Emery explains, lists 550 different varieties of marijuana seeds.

“For height, you can get a short plant, a tall plant, a purple plant, a red plant, one that goes indoor, outdoor. One that’s good for almost anything that ails you,” he explains. “That I could have sold to you and it would address your medical needs or whatever your needs are in regards to cannabis.”

“Somebody could order any one of these strains and you’d just put it in an envelope?” Simon asked.

“Yes, very simple because you just need a number 10 business size envelope and away it went in the mail for just 85 cents,” Emery replied.

Emery claims to be the first marijuana seed vendor to sell seeds directly over the Internet. His Web site, Marc Emery Direct, sold seeds with names like “Chocolate Chunk” and “The Hog,” which sold at $275 Canadian (ca. $240 U.S.) for just 10 seeds, available to anyone in the world with access to a computer.

Asked how much money he has made in this business over the years, Emery says, “I would say that our sales of seeds over 10 years probably were around $15 million.”

The seeds he sold were used to grow a highly prized type of marijuana called British Columbia bud, or “BC Bud.” Only the bud of the plant is sold for smoking, making it much more potent — and expensive — than it was back in the days when people smoked crushed marijuana leaves and went to Woodstock.

“It is very powerful. It has a reputation — it’s almost been marketed, this, marijuana from British Columbia is great pot,” McKay said.

Asked if there is something special about “BC Bud” or whether it is a marketing ploy, Emery said, “They’ve had a wonderful marketing man in charge of that campaign, yours truly.”

He marketed the grass. He marketed the movement. He used the money he made selling seeds literally as seed money to finance the campaign to legalize marijuana in Canada and the United States.

His goal is to make marijuana a controlled substance like alcohol. Emery only smokes in moderation, he says, but he enjoys blowing it in the face of cops, as a provocation.

One such smoke-blowing incident got him arrested, but in tolerant Canada, he was only held for 24 hours.

He also produces and often stars in an online video show, Pot TV. His strategy, he says, is not to overthrow the government but to overgrow the government, spreading marijuana seeds throughout the world and winning the drug war against the United States.

“The whole idea was that I would help facilitate the growth of so much marijuana that the DEA and all the agencies of the United States would ever be able to destroy it at the rate I would help create it and that, ultimately, I, one man, would neutralize the work of the entire DEA with their multi-billion dollar budget,” Emery said.

While Emery was busy being the self-proclaimed “Johnny Appleseed of Marijuana,” the DEA was busy investigating him.

Last summer, the Canadian police — at the request of the U.S. government — shut down his seed business and arrested Emery, who is now out on bail.

Was he surprised that the DEA spent 18 months and a lot of money to get him charged?

“I’m flattered,” said Emery.

Why spend so much time and money investigating a seed seller? Because under U.S. law, selling seeds is the same as selling marijuana itself. And selling “BC Bud” makes Emery part of a multi-billion dollar business the United States wants to crush.

“We have a huge regional, national and international issue here in the growing of marijuana in lower British Columbia,” McKay said. “That’s a major problem for us. His activities are kind of at the leading edge of that marijuana problem. That’s the thing that really concerns us.”

Asked if the problem is growing, McKay said: “Absolutely. And literally.”

And it’s growing in some of the nicest neighborhoods in Vancouver. So much marijuana is grown inside homes in Vancouver that there’s a special unit in the local police force called “Grow Busters.”

They raid homes — often expensive ones — that have been turned into indoor marijuana farms, called grow-ops. The police estimate there could be as many as 20,000 houses like this in British Columbia.

Each room has plants at different stages of growth. The Grow Busters cut down the plants and put the grow-ops out of business. But they grow back as quickly as they’re shut down and, since Canadian courts have been soft on marijuana offenses, growers rarely get much jail time, making this a high profit, low risk business.

DEA special agent Rodney Benson took 60 Minutes up in a helicopter to see some of the ways “BC Bud” is smuggled into the United States.

Benson pointed out the border, which in this case turned out to be a road. This road divides the two countries, half of it is in Canada, half in the United States.

The border stretches 4,000 miles, often through rural areas that are hard to police. Some drug traffickers just run across the border with hockey bags full of “BC Bud,” others have more sophisticated means.

Marijuana smugglers dug a tunnel that started in a Quonset hut on the Canadian side, went under the road, and ended up in the living room of a house on the other side.

“Their plan was to have that tunnel turn into a gold mine and push in thousands of pounds of marijuana (up) into the country,” Benson explained.

“Well, guess they put a lot of hard work into it,” Simon remarked.

“Yeah, but it didn’t pay off at the end of the day. We were there waiting for them,” Benson replied.

Much of the marijuana crossing the border is smuggled by Asian and motorcycle gangs but the U.S. government says Marc Emery is responsible for more marijuana in the United States than any known gang.

Larry Campbell, a Canadian senator who formerly served on the drug squad of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, is well aware of Marc Emery.

Asked what he thinks of U.S. officials’ stance that Emery is a major drug trafficker, Campbell says laughing, “Well, if he, if they consider that, then they have bigger problems than I can even imagine. There’s simply no way he’s a major anything.”

“What would the public reaction be here if Marc Emery is extradited to the United States?” Simon asked.

“I think there’d be outrage,” Campbell replied.

They might be outraged that the long arm of the U.S. law reached up into Canada to press charges against someone many Canadians consider harmless.

John McKay says he thinks Emery will be extradited.

“Do you realize what a political issue it’s gonna be in Canada?” Simon asked.

“We have full respect for the laws of Canada, for the sovereignty of Canada. We respect their laws and they respect our laws and he’s violated our laws,” said McKay.

Actually, the laws aren’t all that different, it’s the punishment that is. For Emery, it’s the difference between a modest fine or hard time. He awaits his fate in a simple apartment — he’s never lived the lavish life of a drug dealer, since he claims to have given most of his money to the cause.

He doesn’t face any charges in Canada but, if he’s extradited to the United States, he’ll face all the charges in his indictment, which include selling and distributing marijuana.

Is everything in the indictment against him true?

“Everything that I could possibly verify is true,” said Emery. “They have our customers, they have my methods and they have copies of my Web site even in there. And those are all quite correct.”

“He said to us that nothing in the indictment is false. Everything is true. He admits that on camera,” Simon told McKay.

“Right, well we expect to prove that with his help to a jury in the United States. And we expect to send him to prison for it,” McKay replied.

McKay says, if convicted, Emery could face up to life in prison: “He has moved huge amounts of marijuana; the seeds are considered under U.S. law to be the same as marijuana plants and marijuana itself.”

McKay says he doesn’t know how much of a punishment Emery would get if convicted for the same crime in Canada, but acknowledges he’d probably get a lot less.

“Well, no one has ever gone to jail for selling seeds in Canada and only two people in 35 years have even been charged,” said Emery. “The most recent person fined for selling seeds in the year 2000 received a $200 fine.”

While Emery, with the help of his supporters, is fighting his extradition to the United States, he says he’s resigned to the possibility of prison and even sees a potential benefit, if it brings more attention to the legalization struggle.

“I am blessed by what the DEA has done,” Emery said. “I’d rather see marijuana legalized than me being saved from a U.S. jail.”

“Your language is pretty much that of a martyr,” Simon remarked.

“The language I like to use is one of a person, a leader who’s confident and prepared to accept the punishment that noble purpose will bring about,” Emery replied.

But McKay says he’s not interested in Emery’s cause.

“I’m not interested in his political beliefs, so-called political beliefs. What I’m interested in is the fact that he has distributed drugs in the United States, huge quantities of drugs,” he said. “You know he calls himself the ‘Prince of Pot’ but he may become the prince of federal prison.”

The Canadian courts will decide whether or not to hand Marc Emery over to the Americans. They’ve handed over drug dealers before and, with a newly elected conservative government in Canada, Emery fears that’s likely to happen.

Patrick Fitzgerald is Eliot Ness with a Harvard Law Degree

Stories

Think Again: Mr. Fitzgerald’s Unanswered Questions

by Eric Alterman
November 3, 2005
 

According to this week’s Newsweek, the nation enjoyed two historic moments last Friday. The first was special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald’s press conference outlining his perjury case against “Cheney’s Cheney,” I(rve) Lewis “Scooter” Libby. The second – occurring simultaneously – was that “in the small dining room adjoining the Oval Office, [President Bush] was doing something uncharacteristic: watching live news on TV.” Apparently, the president only watched the first 20 minutes or so of the press conference, but for a guy who famously avoids both print and broadcast news, any small step toward engagement with the “reality-based community” may be a giant step for mankind.

Alas, Fitzgerald’s press conference proved a disappointment to many, in part owing to the attending reporters’ inability to ask him questions he might be likely to answer. Fitzgerald repeatedly declined to speculate about where his ongoing investigation might lead, and made clear early on that he wouldn’t discuss certain topics, but numerous reporters appeared more intent on creating sound bites than in garnering whatever information might be available, and instead, inspired repeat after repeat of the special prosecutor’s non-response.

Since Fitzgerald has said he has no intention of issuing a final report about this complicated matter, it remains the responsibility of the reporters themselves to fill in the many holes he left in the story. Americans still need to know just what kind of conspiracy was launched here – not merely to attack the credibility of Joe Wilson and blow the cover off his CIA agent wife, but also to fool the nation into going to war. Here are just a few of them:

Where’s Dick?

As The Washington Post’s Bart Gellman reported in his excellent exegesis of the known story so far, “Libby and Cheney made separate inquiries to the CIA about Wilson’s wife, and each confirmed independently that she worked there. It was Cheney, the indictment states, who supplied Libby the detail ‘that Wilson’s wife worked . . . in the Counterproliferation Division’ – an unambiguous declaration that her position was among the case officers of the operations directorate.” The question we still need to ask is, “Do we know the extent of Cheney’s involvement in his subordinate’s decision to leak classified information and lie about it to a Grand Jury?” We know part of the answer from the indictment itself, and as Josh Marshall pointed out, “Libby had consulted with Cheney about how to handle inquiries from journalists about the vice president’s role in sending Wilson to Africa in early 2002.”

What’s more, on the now-infamous July 12, 2003 Air Force Two flight from Washington to Norfolk, Virginia, according to the indictment, “LIBBY discussed with other officials aboard the plane what LIBBY should say in response to certain pending media inquiries, including questions from Time reporter Matthew Cooper.” Who, exactly, are these “other officials?” Is one of them the vice president? As Gellman wrote in the Post, on that flight “the vice president instructed his aide to alert reporters of an attack launched that morning on Wilson’s credibility by Fleischer, according to a well-placed source.” The question we need to answer is: What else did Cheney “instruct his aide” to do? And are any of these actions indictable? Has Anybody Pled Guilty?

Another thing we still don’t know is if anyone pled guilty in the case. As TNR’s Ryan Lizza reported over the weekend, he asked Fitzgerald’s spokesman Randall Samborn just that question. Samborn partially dodged the question, telling Lizza that there was no “public record” of any pleas. Not satisfied, Lizza put the question to “a white collar criminal defense attorney,” who told him that “Guilty pleas can be taken under seal – and often are – when the person entering the plea is cooperating with the government and they do not want to tip off the other targets or there is a safety concern. Also, plea agreements could have already been reached but not formally entered in court.” Where’s Phase II?

All this was wrought, in the end, by the administration’s use of faulty intelligence to justify its invasion of Iraq in March 2003. In a bit of crystal ball gazing this past Sunday, Frank Rich wrote in The New York Times about the Senate Intelligence Committee’s failure to issue the “Phase II” section of its report on the administration’s use of that intelligence, calling it a “scandal in its own right.” It is, although it has largely been ignored until Murray Waas reported in The National Journal last week that Cheney and Libby were refusing to hand over to the committee certain documents, which included “the Libby-written passages in early drafts of Colin Powell’s notorious presentation of W.M.D. ‘evidence’ to the U.N. on the eve of war.” As we know, Harry Reid threw this in the face of the nation on Tuesday, when he invoked Rule 21 and forced Senate Republicans to agree to form a bipartisan committee to find out why we haven’t seen this “Phase II” report.

Where’s Novak?

Enough said.

Will we ever have fully satisfactory answers to questions that initially inspired the Fitzgerald investigation, as well as those it has raised in its wake? Likely not. But if reporters and news organizations decide to invest the time and money in trying to find the answers to these and other key questions, they might at least make a start at making amends to their readers, viewers and listeners for accepting administration claims at face value in the first place, and allowing the nation to be led by lies into war.

Just one request to Bill Keller and the folks at the Times, however: Could you please keep Judy Miller off the story? She’s done her part….

Eric Alterman is a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress and the author of six books, including most recently, When Presidents Lie: A History of Official Deception and Its Consequences, just published in paperback by Penguin.

 

www.americanprogress.org

Become a Gmail Master

Stories

Gmail is hands-down the best web-based email service on the ‘net. Conversation threads, search, tagging, and keyboard shortcuts have completely revolutionized the way I look at my inbox. I manage all of my email from my personal Gmail inbox, including the daily flood of Lifehacker messages. At this point, I can’t imagine a program I could use to manage my email any more efficiently.

Despite my undying love for Gmail, there are still a lot of people who aren’t won over by sheer enthusiasm alone, and still others who just aren’t taking full advantage of the features and functions they’ve got at their fingertips in Gmail. Either way, the only thing a Gmail naysayer needs is a better understanding of everything you can do with Gmail.

Today I’ve got a rundown of the methods and add-ons I use to make Gmail more powerful. By the time you’re done with this article you’ll be a bona fide Gmail power user, too.

http://www.lifehacker.com/software/gmail/hack-attack-become-a-gmail-master-161399.php

Accuracy In Media to Russert: “Withdraw from Coverage”

Stories

WASHINGTON: Citing his role as a likely prosecution witness in a criminal trial involving former vice-presidential chief of staff Lewis Libby, Accuracy in Media said today that Tim Russert of NBC News should voluntarily remove himself from any network coverage of the CIA leak case. “The basic standards of fair and objective journalism require that Russert withdraw from the coverage,” declared AIM editor Cliff Kincaid. “He is a widely respected journalist but he is just too deeply involved in this case to continue to report or comment on it.”
http://www.aim.org/press_release/4130_0_19_0_C/