Skip to content

Posts tagged ‘ABC’

In Case You Missed It : ABC Whacks Shales Over Attack on Amanpour

Salon.com

By Justin Elliott

The network calls Tom Shales’ claim that Christiane Amanpour sympathizes with the Taliban “utterly fabricated”

 

ABC is hitting back at Washington Post TV critic Tom Shales for pushing “an utterly fabricated controversy” about “This Week” host Christiane Amanpour supposedly calling on viewers to honor slain Taliban fighters.

To review the background here: Amanpour, formerly chief international correspondent at CNN, had her debut on Sunday as the new host of This Week, ABC’s sunday politics show. When her selection was announced in March, Shales wrote a column attacking Amanpour for supposed anti-Israel bias (on the basis of a random Facebook group), pointedly noting her childhood in Iran.

So it wasn’t surprising when Shales wrote a new column Monday panning the debut of Amanpour, the “globe-trotting Fancy-Pants.” But critics have questioned what Shales’ was talking about with the following passage from his column accusing Amanpour of sympathy for the Taliban:

Perhaps in keeping with the newly globalized program, the commendable “In Memoriam” segment ended with a tribute not to American men and women who died in combat during the preceding week but rather, said Amanpour in her narration, in remembrance of “all of those who died in war” in that period. Did she mean to suggest that our mourning extend to members of the Taliban?

Jeffrey Schneider, senior vice president at ABC, told Salon that Shales’ criticism here is “utterly fabricated.”

“Christiane took the language from a prayer that she says in her Catholic church every weekend. It’s a bidding prayer,” Schneider said.

He accused Shales of “trying to create some kind of controversy out of something that is utterly well intentioned — which is to honor both U.S. soldiers that have died in battle as well as civilians and ordinary people who die in war all the time. Seems like a fairly non-controversial thing to do.” The segment, which you can watch below, features the names of slain U.S. servicemembers on the screen as Amanpour speaks.

Shales did not respond to a request for comment about his critiques.

Asked about the gendered language Shales used in his column — referring to “Grand Duchess Amanpour” and calling the show “shrill” — Schneider said: “There’s been a lot written and said about what Tom said about Christiane. I don’t think I need to add my voice to that. We scratch our heads at the way in which he has said some of these things. “

It’s worth noting that Shales also once criticized Amanpour for her hairstyle.

Hulu Planning to Charge For Content

THE SEATTLE TIMES

By Dawn C. Chmielewski and Alex Pham

Los Angeles Times

Hulu soared to popularity by offering free online viewing of popular TV shows. Now that free ride may soon end.

The Internet-video site is weighing plans to charge users to watch episodes of “30 Rock,” “Modern Family” and “House.” The move would mark a sharp change of course for the venture, which was launched nearly two years ago by a consortium of studios to distribute without charge TV shows and movies over the Internet. Read more

Jonathan Storm: "FlashForward": Promising Sci-Fi Premise, With Answers and Seth MacFarlane

macfarlane

By Jonathan Storm

Philadelphia Inquirer Television Critic

Poor little Charlie has had a bad dream. No, she wasn’t dreaming about her baby-sitter, Nicole, fooling around downstairs on the couch with her boyfriend. “I dreamt there are no more good days,” she tells Nicole, who has rushed upstairs after passing out while fooling around downstairs on the couch with her boyfriend.

Charlie is not alone in her dreaming, and Nicole is not alone in her passing out. In ABC’s new FlashForward, premiering at 8 tonight, everybody in the world, except maybe this one guy at the Tigers game in Detroit, goes night-night at precisely the same moment, for precisely two minutes and 17 seconds.

And they all have a vision of what they’ll be doing precisely at 10 p.m. (Pacific Daylight Time) next April 29, which, not coincidentally, is a Thursday. The producers hope a lot of them are discussing the pivotal FlashForward episode when the future becomes the present, pretty clever, since that would mean the show was still around and getting ready to finish its first season with a bang during the May “sweeps.”

FlashForward is pretty clever in general, one of the big buzz magnets for the fall season ever since the cast and crew turned up at Comic Con, the big sci-fi convention in San Diego, this summer, and brought along Dominic Monaghan, who played a male Charlie in Lost, and who will turn up later in the series as the single-named Simon in a role being kept all mysterious so as to lure in the fanboys.

Seth MacFarlane, creator of the notorious Family Guy, also plays a recurring character, right from tonight’s get-go. So between the Lost boy and the bad boy, the show has lots to excite that coveted young male audience.

Not that it will seem as crackpot confusing as Lost or as insulting as Family Guy for everybody else. After you take away the spectacular chaos caused when everyone passes out simultaneously, it’s still pretty fascinating. Well-made, too, with decent acting – and the promise that answers will come with reasonable alacrity (at least by the end of the first season, rather than never, which seems to be what happens with Lost).

Two major questions:

1. Why did this flash-forward happen? Nicole thinks it’s God punishing her for her sexual exploits; other possibilities are more sinister. The producers promise clues everywhere, including that kangaroo hopping around downtown Los Angeles. But you don’t have to be crazy-obsessive to enjoy the show. You can probably skip the clues completely, and simply be involved in:

2. How will people get to (or perhaps avoid) the personal future each one sees? As ABC states, “For some, the future will be joyous and hopeful; for others, shockingly unexpected; and for a few, it simply doesn’t seem to exist.”

It’s surprising nobody thought of this intriguing premise before. Oh, all right, somebody did. His name is Robert Sawyer, and he wrote a novel, FlashForward, 10 years ago, which set the producers to thinking, though they swear up and down the flagpole that you won’t learn much about what’s going to happen in the TV show if you read the book.

The characters include a recovering alcoholic FBI agent (Joseph Fiennes, not bad for a TV show) and his surgeon wife (Sonya Walger, another Lost refugee); the agent’s partner (John Cho from Star Trek) and boss (Courtney B. Vance from Law & Order: Criminal Intent); a doctor saved from suicide by the mass blackout; the randy baby-sitter; the mysterious Simon; and a prosecutor who also shows up later (Gabrielle Union from the sadly short-lived Life).

That’s a diverse enough crowd to interest almost anybody. Combine it with the fascinating plot and the action and emotional turmoil it promises, and you don’t need to flash forward to see a show finally giving Survivor a Thursday-night ratings run for the money.

Air France Received Bomb Threat Days Before Crash

Air France Received Threat About a Paris-Bound Flight Days Before Flight 447 Crashed

A B C  N E W S

By AMMU KANNAMPILLY, ZOE MAGEE, LISA STARK and KATE BARRETT

June 3, 2009 —

ABC News has confirmed that Air France received a bomb threat over the phone concerning a flight from Buenos Aires, Argentina, to Paris days before Air France flight 447 disappeared over the Atlantic Ocean Sunday night.

Authorities at Buenos Aires’ Ezeiza Airport delayed the May 27 flight before takeoff and conducted a 90-minute search of the threatened aircraft. Passengers were not evacuated during the search, which yielded no explosive material. After the inspection, authorities allowed the plane to take off for Paris.

Four days later, flight 447 from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, to Paris disappeared with 228 people onboard. On Tuesday searchers found debris from the plane floating in the Atlantic Ocean 700 miles off the coast of Brazil. There was no known threat against that flight.

Watch “World News with Charles Gibson” Tonight at 6:30 p.m. ET for the full report.

Brazilian Air Force spokesman Jorge Amaral told reporters today that the debris is spread out in two main areas, about 35 miles apart, located some 400 miles from the Brazilian islands of Fernando de Noronha. Searchers have seen scattered pieces of debris, including what appears to be a seat, on the ocean.

But bad weather is hampering recovery efforts, with sea currents said to be impeding the process. And weather aside, recovering debris in this part of the ocean may not be easy. The underwater area where the search is focused is extremely mountainous terrain, and Google Earth estimates the water there to be 13,000 feet deep.

“That’s like searching for an airplane in the surface of the mountains. You could be very close and not be able to see the wreckage,” said John Hansman, a professor of aeronautics and astronautics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Still, Brazil’s president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, expressed his determination to find the plane.

“A country that could find oil in 3,700 meters deep in the ocean is going to be able to find a plane 1,200 meters deep,” he said in a statement.

Passenger Arthur Coakley’s wife keeps trying his cell phone — also determined to get an answer.

“I haven’t tried it today, but yesterday it was ringing,” said Patricia Coakley. “So maybe they’re not at the bottom of the sea.”

Today, the head of France’s accident investigation agency, Paul-Louis Arslanian, described the case of the missing flight 447 as the “worst French aviation disaster in history.”

Air France Flight 447: Searching for Clues

Arslanian added that France has four groups of investigators working on the case. The first group will search for debris, and the other three groups will study the plane’s equipment and maintenance records. He emphasized that there were no suggestions of any problems with the plane before takeoff.

He also said he was “not optimistic” of recovering the aircraft’s black boxes (cockpit voice and data recorders), which are believed to be buried under the sea.

If found, the plane’s black boxes would provide many more clues about what happened. Experts said the black boxes emit pinging signals, although only for a finite period of time, in the water. With tracking beacons that activate when the boxes get wet, the black box radio signal works for about 30 days. But it won’t be easy for search teams to pick up the signal and find a black box — the size of the proverbial bread box — in rocky terrain.

“It can be done, but I think we’re gonna have to look for a little luck on this too,” ABC News aviation consultant John Nance said today.

“They’ll drop those microphones down quite a ways,” Nance added.

Lt. Col. Jed Hudson, a commander at Tyndall Air Force Base in Florida, said that all planes also have emergency transmitters in their tails that are designed to send out distress signals in case of emergency.

It’s possible that this one either malfunctioned or there wasn’t a satellite passing overhead to detect the signal at the time the plane was in trouble, he said. The information can be stored and detected once satellites pass overhead — unless it is too far underwater.

No distress calls were made by the crew, but a series of automatic messages was sent by the plane’s system just before it vanished, reporting lost cabin pressure and electrical failure. Arslanian said the messages were received in a time frame of three minutes. Investigators were working to interpret these messages, he added, saying that he did not want to go into details at such an early stage of the probe.

Today, 12 military planes, including one American plane and one French aircraft, and ships were engaged in an operation to recover the debris. A forensic scientist is also believed to be onboard one of the planes to help with the recovery operation.

A French search and exploration ship is also on its way to the crash site. It is equipped with tools to help recover debris, including robots that can plunge about 20,000 feet underwater. It could be a few days before the ship arrives where the debris has been spotted.

“Because of the way this airplane disappeared, we have very little evidence to start to put together what happened,” Hansman said. “So anything they can get from the debris field in the ocean is going to be important in terms of clues.”

Weather Worries

The reasons behind the crash remain unclear, with many speculating that it could have been a result of thunderstorms and lightning or a combination of both. But ABC News has confirmed that two commercial planes flew virtually the same route as that taken by the Air France jet just before and after the missing flight.

Arslanian said that to the best of his knowledge, the pilot at the controls told Brazilian air control that he was experiencing turbulence about 30 minutes before the plane’s disappearance. He said it was unclear whether the chief pilot was in the cockpit when the plane went down, since pilots usually take turns at the controls during long-haul flights.

He stressed that the investigation was only in its early stages, and he could not confirm how the plane went down.

“We don’t even know the exact time of the accident,” he said, adding that “our objective today is to publish the first report by the end of June.”

A Lufthansa spokesman told ABC News he knew of one flight in the area at the time, but it is not clear if that plane encountered any poor weather.

“This flight operated normally without any irregularities reported by the crew,” Lufthansa said in a Tuesday statement.

French Transport Minister Jean-Louis Borloo said Tuesday he did not believe bad weather alone could have brought the plane down. He also brushed off the idea that terrorism or a hijacking could be involved.

“There really had to be a succession of extraordinary events to be able to explain this situation,” he told France’s RTV radio.

Nance agreed that it would be almost unheard of for a plane to be downed by lightning alone but added, “You never say never.”

Nance also said Tuesday it’s unlikely that turbulence could break up a plane: “In most circumstances, absolutely not,” he said. “The aircraft can take anything the atmosphere can throw at it, except for tornadoes.”

In very rare cases, Nance said, a plane could be trying to recover from severe turbulence and then hit more, causing too much stress for the plane.

AccuWeather’s Ken Reeves said towering thunderstorms are common over that area of the Atlantic. He said planes typically fly at about 35,000 to 37,000 feet, and storms in the tropics can be as high as 50,000 feet.

“In that part of the tropics, with as high as the thunderstorms are, it can be difficult having to go hundreds and hundreds of miles out of your way in order to just get to the point you’re trying to get to,” Reeves said.

“We are really talking about extreme circumstances here,” said William Voss, president and CEO of Flight Safety Foundation. “And so a rainy night out of LaGuardia isn’t what we are talking about. We are talking about situations that are very extreme, very severe turbulence is assumed to have occurred here. And there’s not many of us — not even many pilots that have really experienced severe turbulence. You would know it if you had.”

The four-year-old Airbus jet did have sophisticated radar that should have helped the pilots try to skirt any violent weather.

Mystery Over the Atlantic: The Passengers Onboard

According to the Brazilian air force, there’s no indication that anyone survived.

The missing Airbus A330 had 216 passengers and 12 crew onboard when it took off Sunday night. All 12 crew members were French, according to the airline.

The list of the missing indicates a virtual United Nations of passengers. The passengers came from more than 30 countries, and included Americans Michael and Ann Harris, who had been living in Rio for more than a year. Tuesday afternoon, U.S. State department officials said a third American, a dual citizen traveling under a foreign passport, was also onboard.

In addition to the three U.S. citizens, the passengers included 61 French citizens, 58 Brazilians, 26 Germans, nine Chinese and nine Italians. The group included seven children, a baby, 126 men and 82 women.

Michael Harris, a geologist working in Brazil for natural gas and oil producer Devon Energy, had been transferred from Houston to Brazil in 2008.

“We are extremely saddened by this development and trying to monitor the situation as it unfolds,” said Devon Energy spokesman Tony Thornton in a statement. “We’re doing what we can to help the family at this time.”

U.S. State Department spokesman Robert Wood has said the U.S. government is also in touch with the families of the Americans onboard.

The flight had been expected to land in Paris at 5:15 a.m. ET after leaving Rio around 6 p.m. Sunday night.

The Brazilian air force said in a statement that it had been anticipating radio contact with the plane when it was still over northeast Brazil, but when it received no radio communication, Brazilian air traffic control contacted air traffic control in Dakar, Senegal. There was no mayday call and no nearby planes received a call for help on the international emergency frequency.

Word came Monday night that a crew from TAM, Brazil’s largest air carrier, saw orange spots on the ocean while flying over the same general area as the Air France Flight 447.

“If that was, in fact, debris burning from this aircraft, then that tells us that it broke up in flight,” ABC News aviation consultant John Nance said Tuesday.

Air France said the captain of the flight had more than 11,000 hours of flight time, including 1,700 hours on the Airbus A330/A340.

There are 341 A330 planes of this type operating worldwide. Airbus released a statement saying it would be “inappropriate for Airbus to enter into any form of speculation into the causes of the accident.

“The concerns and sympathy of the Airbus employees go to the families, friends and loved ones affected by the accident,” the statement read.

“The mid oceans are one of the remotest parts of the world,” Hansman said. “It’s like going to the North Pole. It’s in an area where there is very limited ability to communicate.”

ABC News’ Renata Araujo, Sonia Gallego, Joe Goldman, Christel Kucharz, Luis Martinez, Phoebe Natanson, Gabriel O’Rorke, Samira Parkinson-Smith, Kirit Radia and Christophe Schpoliansky, Reuters and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Phil Lesh & Bob Weir on "The View" 2009-03-30

You Know It's Gonna Get Stranger So Let's Get On With the T.V. Show

As TV networks tighten belts, look for fewer stars, fewer risks

harlem

CBS wanted Candice Bergen to star in its potential new comedy Big D, one of several pilots being considered for next fall’s lineup. She’d play a difficult mother who makes like complicated for her son and his wife, new East Coast transplants to Dallas.

An early meeting was promising. Bergen is a bankable TV star, a five-time Emmy winner for the network’s own Murphy Brown and, more recently, a feisty fixture of ABC’s Boston Legal.

But when it came time to negotiate her salary, the two sides were worlds apart. In past years, the network and its studio supplier would have coughed up the dough to make the deal happen, and Bergen’s mere presence would increase the odds that Big D would secure a spot on CBS’ schedule.

Instead, CBS passed, the network confirmed. It instead cast Deanna Dunagan, a well-regarded but largely unknown Broadway actress, for a fraction of Bergen’s asking price.

That’s the math in the new Hollywood, where a combination of declining network ratings, sharply lower ad revenue and escalating production costs have forced cutbacks. The new austerity is being felt most keenly during the spring “development season,” when networks groom a new crop of shows they’ll consider for fall lineups.

Among the tactics:

• Reining in those star salaries — reduced by 10% to 50% from their previous paychecks — and hiring cheaper, unknown talent and fewer established big-name actors.

• Filming in relatively inexpensive locales such as Atlanta, Boston and Detroit, thanks partly to tax breaks for television productions. All of Fox’s drama pilots and many of NBC’s will be filmed in Canada, where the stronger U.S. dollar and lower labor costs save $500,000 an episode.

• Sharply reducing the layers of credited producers who collect paychecks but do little day-to-day work on series, and eliminating most penalty fees when sought-after projects don’t get made.

• Shooting many shows more cheaply by using digital video instead of 35-millimeter film, and emphasizing multicamera sitcoms with a studio audience (such as CBS’ Two and a Half Men) over film-style comedies (such as NBC’s The Office), which cost twice as much to produce.

“This is a moment in time when everyone recognizes we have to do things differently,” says Nancy Tellem, CBS Paramount Television Group chief.

She blames the situation on a “perfect storm” of last winter’s writers’ strike, the tanking economy and NBC’s decision to hand five hours of prime time to Jay Leno this fall by sharply reducing its drama slots.

Leno’s move, she says, “sent shudders through the entire community” as it increased networks’ leverage to cut costs. Even current series aren’t immune; some are being asked to cut budgets 10% next season.

Limiting ambitions

Back in the heady days of Friends, ER and Seinfeld— and even more recently with Heroes and Lost— huge sums were lavished on new dramas and comedies, in a business in which the vast majority of the new shows each year wind up failing. The prospect of a smash hit, however slim, was enough to warrant big investments by the major networks.

But increasingly, “it’s a business where the hits no longer pay for the losers,” says NBC Universal Television co-chairman Marc Graboff. “Revenues are lower, there’s fragmentation in ratings, and the costs are higher. Twenty-two hours a week of high-quality, high-cost programming is a very difficult challenge.”

That’s why it’s not happening anymore.

Cheaper reality and news shows fill slots that would otherwise go to sitcoms and dramas. Leno’s weeknight show will cost a fraction of a drama’s price tag while leaving less room on the TV schedule for another show to become a smash hit or eventually score a big payday from syndication.

Big stars such as Kelsey Grammer have taken pay cuts to keep working. And although Charlie Sheen (Two and a Half Men) and Laurence Fishburne (CSI) pull more than $350,000 an episode, second-tier players who routinely got $125,000 an episode not that long ago now are settling for about $80,000.

“What it’s forcing us to do is look at how to produce even more efficiently than we had in the past,” says CBS Paramount studio chief David Stapf. “We can’t just throw money at things.”

He adds that “the key is to do it in a way where viewers don’t notice.”

Last year, NBC raised eyebrows by scrapping pilots and picking new shows based on scripts, shaving millions in upfront production costs. But every new show it tried failed this season, and the fourth-place network is back making pilots again.

Even so, several networks are making fewer pilots, saving money but possibly reducing their chances of finding a hit from the right blend of script, cast and director — a recipe for successful shows that sometimes isn’t obvious on a paper script.

NBC scrapped plans to shoot one pilot — a period family show called Life in the ’80s— after spending more than $1 million because the show came too close to a remake of 1989 movie Parenthood that was also in the works. “Three or four years ago, we would have made both of them,” NBC Entertainment president Angela Bromstad says.

CBS and ABC are exceptions to the pared-down development trend. ABC has ordered 24 pilots, featuring TV stars such as Grammer, Friends‘ Courteney Cox, Everybody Loves Raymond‘s Patricia Heaton and Gilmore Girls‘ Lauren Graham.

Research and development “to me is the lifeblood of the business,” says ABC network and studio chief Steve McPherson. “It’s the process that has brought us all the shows that have been iconic over the years.”

But in this new climate, networks are taking fewer swings for the fences as a new conservative approach favors series about cops, lawyers and doctors over more ambitious serialized thrillers such as Lost.

“As pressure has mounted and the economy has worsened, in some cases there is a greater reluctance to take risks and chances in favor of tried-and-true franchises,” says Peter Roth, president of Warner Bros. TV, a major supplier unaffiliated with a top network.

“In some ways I understand it: It’s often a way to break through the clutter in marketing,” he says. “From the networks’ perspective, it’s thought to be a more sure-fire way to get a hit.”

Familiar themes

But hits are elusive even in good times, and that’s true now more than ever as network audiences drift to cable.

Typically, one in five pilots becomes a weekly series, and of those, perhaps one in five proves lasting.

There are still a few big bets:

• ABC is spending $7 million on Flash Forward, an ambitious series based on the sci-fi novel that it hopes is the next Lost. (Everyone blacks out for 2 minutes and 17 seconds and has a vision of the future.)

• Fox has Human Target, based on the DC Comics franchise.

• CBS has the 9/11-influenced Back, about a man missing for eight years, starring Jericho‘s Skeet Ulrich.

• And NBC has Day One, which follows the fallout of a “global catastrophe.”

More typical is the marketing-driven tendency — as in movies — to rely on tested franchises. Even though NBC’s Bionic Woman and Knight Rider bombed, remakes of previous hit shows remain a popular tactic.

ABC has Eastwick, based on the feature film version of John Updike’s The Witches of Eastwick, and V, based on NBC’s 1980s sci-fi series about reptilian aliens.

Fox, meanwhile, has a new take on Britain’s Absolutely Fabulous, about two outrageous women. NBC is mulling that do-over of Parenthood, and CW, which renewed its Beverly Hills, 90210 remake, is at work on a new version Melrose Place and a spinoff of Gossip Girl.

Fox will spin off The Cleveland Show from Family Guy. And CBS is weighing its own spinoff of NCIS.

A few proposed sitcoms have used the economic climate in their story lines.

ABC’s Canned centers on a group of friends who are fired on the same day, and another series stars Frasier‘s Grammer as a Wall Street big shot who loses his job and is “forced to reconnect” with his small-town family.

Meanwhile, Fox has Two Dollar Beer, about Detroit pals who are sons of laid-off autoworkers.

“We’re always looking at the zeitgeist and finding aspects we can reflect on TV,” McPherson says. “Comedy is a great way you can get a release. There’s less pain because you realize we’re all going through it and you can laugh at other people in the same circumstance.”

But all the big networks are seeking to reignite the family sitcom, hugely popular in the 1980s with The Cosby Show but largely absent since Everybody Loves Raymond called it quits in 2005.

Overall, there are fewer foreboding, convoluted dramas.

“Most of our pilots in general have a lighter tone. They’re a little more escapist conceptually,” says Fox entertainment chief Kevin Reilly. “The times can’t help but influence your choices.”

So can performance: The audience for NBC’s Heroes, which at $4 million an episode is one of TV’s priciest dramas, plunged 27% this season.

“We’re definitely trying to come away from dark, overserialized dramas,” Bromstad says.

Several proposed CBS series focus on aspirational “characters who have been through or are going through a period of transition in their life,” says CBS Entertainment president Nina Tassler, though it wasn’t planned that way.

Take The Good Wife‘s Julianna Margulies, who plays a lawyer returning to the work force when her disgraced politico husband, a fictional stand-in for former New York governor Eliot Spitzer, is sent to prison.

“They go through obstacles, they triumph and they succeed,” Tassler says.

That sounds like a happy ending the networks would love to script for themselves.

Fairness Doctrine or Media Control Doctrine? | An In-Depth Discussion

Fairness Doctrine or Media Control Doctrine? | An In-Depth Discussion

Vodpod videos no longer available.


Canceled: Life on Mars Is Dead

Seattle Post-Intelligencer


jason-omara-life-on-mars-photo

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

By MICKEY O’CONNOR
TV GUIDE

ABC has canceled Life on Mars, but will allow the cop drama to complete its full one-season run. The network has opted not to extend the series beyond 17 episodes, according to Variety.

It’s not all bad news, though. Rather than wait until May when on-the-bubble shows are typically told whether or not they’ll be renewed or canceled, ABC told the producers now, so that they can plan for a proper series finale — a courtesy not extended to the recently unplugged ABC shows Pushing Daisies, Dirty Sexy Money and Eli Stone. “We felt it was the right thing to do for the producers and the fans and creatively,” ABC Entertainment Group President Steve McPherson told TelevisionWeek. Calls to ABC were not yet returned.

This is particularly important for Mars, as its mysterious premise — an NYPD cop is hit by a car and spontaneously time-travels back to 1973 — requires some explaining. Is Sam Tyler (Jason O’Mara) in a coma, at the mercy of supernatural forces or something else entirely?

For now, it seems, the fans will get that answer.

Did Life on Mars deserve the ax? Is ABC getting an itchy trigger finger on the cancellation front? And how would you like to see the series end?

General Barry McCaffrey Exposed For The Ultimate Spineless Shill That He Is

THE NEW YORK TIMES

November 30, 2008

One Man’s Military-Industrial-Media Complex

In the spring of 2007 a tiny military contractor with a slender track record went shopping for a precious Beltway commodity.

The company, Defense Solutions, sought the services of a retired general with national stature, someone who could open doors at the highest levels of government and help it win a huge prize: the right to supply Iraq with thousands of armored vehicles.

Access like this does not come cheap, but it was an opportunity potentially worth billions in sales, and Defense Solutions soon found its man. The company signed Barry R. McCaffrey, a retired four-star Army general and military analyst for NBC News, to a consulting contract starting June 15, 2007.

Four days later the general swung into action. He sent a personal note and 15-page briefing packet to David H. Petraeus, the commanding general in Iraq, strongly recommending Defense Solutions and its offer to supply Iraq with 5,000 armored vehicles from Eastern Europe. “No other proposal is quicker, less costly, or more certain to succeed,” he said.

Thus, within days of hiring General McCaffrey, the Defense Solutions sales pitch was in the hands of the American commander with the greatest influence over Iraq’s expanding military.

“That’s what I pay him for,” Timothy D. Ringgold, chief executive of Defense Solutions, said in an interview.

Read more

President-Elect Barack Obama's Press Conference | Dec 1 2008

Part Two

%d bloggers like this: