What 83 year-old William Sidwell of Queen
City, Missouri found in his mailbox last week scared him. It was a
letter from the Republican National Committee, but it seemed to bear
grave news: “Our records show that you registered as a member of our
Party in Schuyler County, MO,” the letter said. “But a recent audit of your Party affiliation turned up some irregularities.”

Audit? Irregularities? Was he in trouble? Were they threatening him?
Sidwell went immediately to his ask his son, Dennis, a licensed public
accountant, for advice. You can see the letter, and the accompanying
“Voter Registration Verification and Audit Form,” right here. Particularly puzzling to the both of them, Dennis told me, is that his father is a life-long Democrat.

The letter, it turns out, is just a misleading pitch for a
contribution to the RNC — one of the “irregularities” cited in the
letter is that “I cannot find a record of you taking a single action in support of the Republican Party — not locally, not nationally!” A contribution, the letter suggests, would help set the record straight.

The letter is signed by Bill Steiner, the director of the RNC’s
Office of Strategic Information, a title Steiner assumed at the end of
July. His responsibilities “include managing the RNC’s national
voter file and Voter Vault, the committee’s highly touted
micro-targeting operation,” Roll Call reported last month. And indeed, the voter “audit” requests detailed information about the voter’s voting history and current opinions on the 2008 presidential race.

It’s unclear how many similar letters (tens of thousands? millions?)
have been sent by the RNC. The RNC did not respond to our requests for
comment.

The letter “appears to be in a gray area,” David Becker, Director of
People for the American Way’s Democracy Campaign and a former voting
rights attorney at the Justice Department, told me. “It could
potentially run afoul of the law if it led an eligible voter to believe
they’re no longer eligible to vote.” The letter, Becker said, “appears
designed to give that mistaken impression.”

Rick Hasen, a professor
specializing in election law at Loyola Law School, agreed that the
letter was potentially misleading but didn’t think it raised serious
legal issues: “It is true that some elderly people or others with
limited experience might perceive the letter as some kind of official
audit, complete with its statements about ‘irregularities,'” he told
me. “But I believe most people would view this for what it is: a
ham-handed fundraising letter, of the type sent out by both political
parties to rev up the base and get contributions.”

Karen Finney, spokeswoman for the Democratic National Committee,
disagreed. “We have sent requests for people to renew their support for
the party,” Finney said, but they’re “straightforward,” and don’t
include “these kind of scare tactics.” She said that the letter showed
that the RNC is “stooping to a level of desperation to try and hold on
to support and raise money.”

TPMmuckraker August 10, 2007

Powered by ScribeFire.