Eric Alterman |
Despite his lies and incompetence, Bush remains more popular with elite media than Clinton or any other political leader who sought to save us from the Iraq catastrophe. Why won’t they connect the dots?
Eric Alterman |
Despite his lies and incompetence, Bush remains more popular with elite media than Clinton or any other political leader who sought to save us from the Iraq catastrophe. Why won’t they connect the dots?
“Bush’s War on the Press.” ::: ALTERMAN
the Washington Post’s Dan Eggen reported this past Sunday, the pushback against not only reporters, but also federal whistleblowers, has been swift and severe. Eggen’s found “dozens” of employees from the CIA, the NSA and other intelligence agencies who have been interviewed by FBI agents “investigating possible leaks that led to reports about secret CIA prisons and the NSA’s warrantless domestic surveillance program.” What’s more, many employees at the CIA, FBI and the Justice Department “have received letters from Justice prohibiting them from discussing even unclassified issues related to the NSA program.”
Do Vanity Fair reporters have some kind of truth serum for their interview subjects? It seems as though people are always admitting things like eating disorders or revealing their sources in huge government scandals, and then, suddenly, they never said any of these things.
First it was Lindsay Lohan‘s “I never said I had an eating disorder.” Now we have Washington Post executive editor Ben Bradlee claiming that “he doesn’t remember” telling the mag that former State Department official Richard L. Armitage is the likely source who named Valerie Plame to Post assistant managing editor Bob Woodward.
In an article to be published in the magazine today, Bradlee is quoted as saying: “That Armitage is the likely source is a fair assumption.” Armitage was deputy secretary of state in President Bush’s first term.
This month’s VF “officially” hits newsstands today, and the tell-all issue also features Teri Hatcher‘s confession that she was molested as a child. And a bunch of other stuff that nobody remembers ever saying.
http://www.jossip.com/gossip/vanity-fair/the-case-of-vanity-fairs-mystery-amnesia-20060314.php
:::Magazine: Bradlee Knows Woodward’s Source on Plame Jim VandeHei, Washington Post:::
It’s GALLING….
She referred to hotel-balcony reporters not giving us the good stories in the middle of this war zone where just three days ago, the windows in NBC’s offices were shattered once again. She went there last month for a week or so and reporter Richard Engel has been putting his life on the line the last three years, living with shattered windows and kidnappings of the press and daily IED blasts. Over 50 journalists have been killed in Iraq, Ms. Ingraham.
There’s just Crazy Sectarian bloodshed and mass murders going on and the right-wingers, still to this day, remain dazed by the Kool-aide and she chalks it all up to Bush-hating and liberals actually wanting America to fail over there. That’s all they have left. And none of us forget those of you who were behind this war when there were sane voices warning us of this fate and they were bullied out. We remember and you don’t get to jump ship now with these sorry excuses for your equally lame excuses. O’Reilly had her on that night on his Peabody Award®-winning program, agreed with her, and said he’s really getting peeved about the tone in America. Former Senator Alan Simpson told Larry King that he sure didn’t like the partisanship permeating Washington.
Uh-uh.
You don’t get to be pissed that we’re mad;
The Republicans created this harsh environment. The so-called weak Democrats can’t even get a hearing room from these hacks and Excuse me, but let’s just cut the old crap about how “both parties are the same” because that’s the kind of mindless drivel that goes right along with “everyone thought Saddam had WMD’s” and “the democrats can’t seem to do anything” ….and just for good measure:
“There ain’t no diference between Al Gore and George W. Bush”- idiot in America
But that kinda thinking wins out….
and we all lose.
BONUS :::BULL::::
“Everyone knew she was a C.I.A. agent”
http://mediamatters.org/items/200603220013
http://movies.crooksandliars.com/nbc_today_ingraham_carville_gregory_060320a_320x240.wmv
HEY- OUR TORTURE ISN’T SO BAD!
AFTER ALL- SADDAM WAS WORSE!
Posted by Noel Sheppard on March 22, 2006 – 11:25.
Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly had radio host Laura Ingraham on “The O’Reilly Factor” Tuesday evening (hat tip to Expose the Left). Fresh from her battle with NBC’s David Gregory on the “Today Show,” O’Reilly wanted Ingraham’s view (video link to follow) about NBC (from closed captioning):
Bill: Is it your opinion that NBC news spins the war in Iraq negative?
Laura: Well, it’s not between me and NBC, Bill.
Bill: Look, you’re an analyst. You watch these people. Is it your opinion that NBC news spins the war negative?
Laura: I think that the coverage of the war by NBC that I have really focused on, especially since I was in Iraq last month, to me it seems bizarrely focused only on the I.E.D.’s, only on the latest reprisal killings that are taking place. When stories that are so fascinating and interesting and broader and human interest, stuff the “Today” show and NBC likes to do, those stories are out there for anyone to get. I don’t get it.
O’Reilly then made a very bold castigation of NBC:
…………………………………………………………..
YOU SAID IT….ASS
Posted by Mark Finkelstein on March 22, 2006 – 07:56.
Stung by allegations levelled by Laura Ingraham yesterday, NBC has admitted that its Iraqi coverage is inaccurate because it’s . . . not negative enough.
Ingraham clearly hit an MSM sore spot with the charges she made during her appearance on yesterday’s Today show, in which she locked horns with David Gregory and James Carville. Read Laura in the Lions Den.
Ingraham accused most American media of covering Iraq from their balconies in the Green Zone, confining their reports largely to IEDs and killings and missing the more positive stories that abound across the country.
On this morning’s Today show, a defensive NBC asked whether it is doing a good job reporting on Iraq, and – surprise! – the Peacock Network assured itself and its viewers that indeed it is. If anything, Today told us, the situation in Iraq is even worse than the MSM portray it. You might say NBC’s position is that its coverage is not negative enough.
……………………………………………………………………….
Posted by Brad Wilmouth on March 22, 2006 – 02:17.
On his Monday March 20 Countdown show, MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann disputed President Bush’s recent contention that he had never claimed “that there was a direct connection between September the 11th and Saddam Hussein” by citing one awkward quote from the President, which stood in contrast to other public statements that more clearly communicated the point about the 9/11 attacks being a lesson that inspired a confrontation of Iraq, rather than Iraq actually being involved in the attacks. Olbermann rhetorically posed the question: “Who does the President think he’s ‘f’-ing kidding?” On the Tuesday March 21 show, Olbermann added that “any six-year-old would have recognized that his administration had deliberately left exactly that impression.” Guest Craig Crawford labeled Bush’s recent comments as “presidential prevarication” and compared it to Bill Clinton saying, “Depends on what the definition of ‘is’ is.” Notably, as recounted by CyberAlert, the Countdown host once before used selectively edited statements by Dick Cheney to make it appear the Vice President had claimed a connection between Iraq and the 9/11 attacks, while omitting more of Cheney’s words which clarified his meaning. (Transcripts follow.)
DON’T PULL SOMETHING THERE BUDDY…..SHEESH
I’m Already Exhausted……What a bunch of wankers!
The gang that couldn’t do anything straight: Moussaoui is the tip of the dirty iceberg
E.Alterman ::::: http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3449870/
This is too easy. Did they think that nobody was paying attention? They’ve lost Bin Laden, screwed up Afghanistan, completely wrecked Iraq, destroyed our fiscal future, left us completely vulnerable on homeland security, ignored the threats to New Orleans, messed up its recovery, thrown science out the window, attacked our civil liberties, undermined freedom of the press, you know the drill. Why is anyone surprised that they are both incompetent and dishonest when it comes to seeking justice for the terrorist murder of thousands of Americans?
So far, the White House press corps hasn’t bought it. But today, Fox News correspondent Carl Cameron became the first reporter use the term “terrorist surveillance program” during a White House press conference.
From today’s Press Conference:
THE PRESIDENT: Carl.
CAMERON: Thank you, sir. On the subject of the terrorist surveillance program –
THE PRESIDENT: Yes.
CAMERON: — not to change the tone from all this emphasis on bipartisanship, but there have been now three sponsors to a measure to censure you for the implementation of that program.
Cameron is not only doing the administration’s bidding – he is not doing his job. The term “terrorist surveillance program” could refer to any number of programs, many of which have been around for decades and are not at all controversial.
The program at issue is different precisely because it is conducted a) without a warrant and b) involves people on U.S. soil. That’s why it’s accurately described as a warrantless domestic wiretapping program.
Posted by Payson March 21, 2006 3:50 pm