Bill Maher | February 15 2008 + New Rules

Andrew Sullivan, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Buffonery, D.C., Election 2008, Frank Luntz, George W. Bush, Hillary Clinton, Iraq, John McCain, MSM, Politics, Tullycast, Writers Strike

Part One

Part Two

Part Three

Part Four

Part Five

Part Six

NEW RULES

O V E R T I M E  

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank

Ambassador Joseph Wilson Endorses Hillary Clinton; Calls Her "Battle Tested"

Barack Obama, David Corn, Dick Cheney, Douglas Feith, Election 2008, Elliot Abrams, Hillary Clinton, Jane Hamsher, Joe Wilson, John McCain, Judge Thomas F. Hogan, Judith Millaer, Karl Rove, Marcy Wheeler, Matt Cooper, Patrick Fitzgerald, Richard Mellon Scaife, Robert Luskin, Robert Novak, Scooter Libby, The District, Tim Russert, Viveca Novak

BaltimoreSun.com

wilsons.jpg

Battle-tested

Hillary Clinton fought the Republican attack machine, and emerged stronger

By Joseph C. Wilson IV

February 12, 2008

With the emergence of Sen. John McCain as the presumptive Republican nominee, the choice for the Democrats in the 2008 presidential election now shifts to who is best positioned to beat him, in what promises to be a more hard-fought campaign – and perhaps a nastier one – than Democrats anticipated.

Sen. Barack Obama’s promise of transformation and an end of partisan politics has its seductive appeal. The Bush-Cheney era, after all, has been punctuated by smear campaigns, character assassinations and ideological fervor.

Nobody dislikes such poisonous partisanship, especially in foreign policy, more than I do. I am one of very few Foreign Service officers to have served as ambassador in the administrations of both George H. W. Bush and Bill Clinton, yet I have spent the past four years fighting a concerted character assassination campaign orchestrated by the George W. Bush White House.

Sen. Hillary Clinton is one of the few who fully understood the stakes in that battle. Time and again, she reached out to my wife – outed CIA officer Valerie Plame Wilson – and me to remind us that as painful as the attacks were, we simply could not allow ourselves to be driven from the public square by bullying. Mrs. Clinton knew from experience, having spent the better part of the past 20 years fighting the Republican attack machine. She is a fighter.

But will Mr. Obama fight? His brief time on the national scene gives little comfort. Consider a February 2006 exchange of letters with Mr. McCain on the subject of ethics reform. The wrathful Mr. McCain accused Mr. Obama of being “disingenuous,” to which Mr. Obama meekly replied, “The fact that you have now questioned my sincerity and my desire to put aside politics for the public interest is regrettable but does not in any way diminish my deep respect for you.”

Mr. McCain was insultingly dismissive but successful in intimidating his inexperienced colleague. Thus, in his one known face-to-face encounter with Mr. McCain, Mr. Obama failed to stand his ground.

What gives us confidence that Mr. Obama will be stronger the next time he faces Mr. McCain, a seasoned political fighter with extensive national security credentials? Even more important, what special disadvantages does Mr. Obama carry into this contest on questions of national security?

How will Mr. Obama answer Mr. McCain about his careless remark about unilaterally bombing Pakistan – perhaps blowing up an already difficult relationship with a nuclear state threatened by Islamic extremists? How will Mr. Obama respond to charges made by the Kenyan government that his campaigning activities in Kenya in support of his distant cousin running for president there made him “a stooge” and constituted interference in the politics of an important and besieged ally in the war on terror?

How will he answer charges that his desire for unstructured personal summits without preconditions with a host of America’s adversaries, from Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to Kim Jong Il, would be little more than premature capitulation?

Contrary to the myth of the Obama campaign, 2008 is not the year for transcendental transformation. The task for the next administration will be to repair the damage done by eight years of radical rule. And the choice for Americans is clear: four more years of corrupt Republican rule, senseless wars, evisceration of the Constitution, emptying of the national treasury – or rebuilding our government and our national reputation, piece by piece.

In order to effect practical change against a determined adversary, we do not need a would-be philosopher-king but a seasoned gladiator who understands the fight Democrats will face in the fall campaign and in governing.

Theodore Roosevelt once said, “It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again … who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly.”

If he were around today, Roosevelt might be speaking of the woman in the arena. Hillary Clinton has been in that arena for a generation. She is one of the few to have defeated the attack machine that is today’s Republican Party and to have emerged stronger. She is deeply knowledgeable about governing; she made herself into a power in the Senate; she is respected by our military; and she never flinches. She has never been intimidated, not by any Republican – not even John McCain.

Barack Obama claims to represent the future, but it should be increasingly evident that he is not the man for this moment, especially with Mr. McCain’s arrival. We’ve seen a preview of that contest already. It was a TKO.

Bill Maher | February 8 2008 | HQ

Barack Obama, Democrats, Election 2008, GOP, Hillary Clinton, Karl Rove, Politics, Scaife

Part One

Part Two

Part Three

Part Four

Part Five

Part Six

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank

Shady Businessman Gives Barack Obama More Cash Than He Admits

Barack Obama, Broadcatching, Chicago, Election 2008, Hillary Clinton, Journalism, Karl Rove, Obama, Politics, Tullycast

Rezko cash triple what Obama says

DONATIONS | $168,000 traced to indicted businessman, associates over the years

June 18, 2007

During his 12 years in politics, Sen. Barack Obama has received nearly three times more campaign cash from indicted businessman Tony Rezko and his associates than he has publicly acknowledged, the Chicago Sun-Times has found.

Obama has collected at least $168,308 from Rezko and his circle. Obama also has taken in an unknown amount of money from people who attended fund-raising events hosted by Rezko since the mid-1990s.

Obama has collected at least $168,308 from Rezko and his circle. Obama also has taken in an unknown amount of money from people who attended fund-raising events hosted by Rezko since the mid-1990s.

But seven months ago, Obama told the Sun-Times his “best estimate” was that Rezko raised “between $50,000 and $60,000” during Obama’s political career.

But seven months ago, Obama told the Sun-Times his “best estimate” was that Rezko raised “between $50,000 and $60,000” during Obama’s political career.

Obama, who wants to be the nation’s next president, has been purging some of those donations — giving charities more than $30,000 he got from Rezko and three of his business partners referenced in Rezko’s federal indictments. All three attended a lavish fund-raiser Rezko hosted for Obama four years ago.

Obama, however, has kept $6,850 from others who also are referenced in Rezko’s indictments. Obama also has hung on to contributions from doctors whom Rezko helped appoint to a state-government panel involved in some of Rezko’s alleged fraud schemes.

“We’ve made our best effort to run the most ethical campaign possible in all ways and release donations when appropriate,” Obama’s press secretary, Bill Burton, said Friday.

Sticks by estimate

Burton said Obama can only estimate how much money Rezko has raised for him. Obama’s staff, he said, only knows of one fund-raiser Rezko hosted for Obama — a June 27, 2003, cocktail party at Rezko’s mansion.Sources close to both Rezko and Obama, however, said Rezko raised money often for Obama.

Burton said Friday the campaign was sticking by its original estimate that Rezko raised no more than $60,000.

The cocktail party Rezko hosted in 2003 came at a critical time for Obama. He and Rezko timed it to help Obama show he had enough money to compete in the Democratic primary for U.S. Senate against millionaire Blair Hull and state Comptroller Dan Hynes.

“This was discussed a lot. They wanted to have a good showing,” said a source familiar with the fund-raiser, speaking on condition of anonymity.

“Tony was one of the biggest fund-raisers.”

At the time of the party, the state was in the process of foreclosing on a low-income apartment building Rezko’s company rehabbed in Obama’s state Senate district — a rehab project on which Obama’s law firm worked. Rezko had also abandoned many other low-income apartments, leaving numerous vacant units in need of major repairs.

Rezko was indicted in October 2006 in unrelated fraud schemes.

Between 75 and 80 people attended Rezko’s cocktail party, according to Burton, but he said the campaign has no list of the guests.

More than half a dozen people who were there said between 100 and 150 guests were treated to an open bar and food served by Jewell Events Catering, run by renowned Chicago caterer George Jewell. Valets parked cars for the guests, who each were asked to donate at least $1,000.

Rezko picked up the tab. The exact cost of the party has never been disclosed to the Federal Election Commission, which allows hosts to pay up to $2,000 for fund-raisers held in their homes and not report the expense. If a party costs more than $2,000, the candidate must tell the FEC about it.

Burton said, based on a conversation a former Obama staff member had with Rezko, that the party didn’t cost more than $2,000.

Three days after the cocktail party, Obama got donations from several Rezko associates, Obama’s campaign records show.

Donations dumped

The donor list includes six people involved in the two federal indictments of Rezko. Obama earlier this month said he is donating to charity contributions totaling $22,000 from three of those people. Last year, he donated $11,500 in contributions from Rezko.Among those whose money Obama is now purging is Ali D. Ata, a former top official in Gov. Blagojevich’s administration. Ata was indicted last month for allegedly writing a letter — on a state letterhead — that contained false information. That letter allegedly helped Rezko fraudulently secure millions of dollars in loans.

Obama also is dumping donations by Rezko business partners Joseph Aramanda and Dr. Paul Ray, neither of whom has been charged in the Rezko cases.

Aramanda, sources said, is identified as “Individual D” in one of the Rezko indictments. He allegedly got a $250,000 fee “in substantial part for the benefit of Rezko” in a scheme involving the state’s teacher pension fund, the indictment states. Aramanda’s son once had an internship in Obama’s U.S. Senate office.

Ray is listed as “Investor 1” in another indictment, a title that stems from his ownership role in a Rezko fast-food business. Ray is not accused of wrongdoing.

While Obama has dumped the cash from Aramanda and Ray, he has kept a $3,000 donation from Michael Winter, whom sources have identified as “Individual G” in a Rezko indictment. Winter allegedly agreed to funnel a fee from an investment firm to Rezko and others as part of the teacher-pension scheme. He has not been charged.

Obama also has kept $2,850 from Anthony Abboud and $1,000 from Jack Carriglio, both attorneys. They haven’t been accused of any crime and aren’t named in the indictments against Rezko. But one indictment alleges that Rezko in May 2004 helped engineer the appointments of “two new members” to the teacher pension board who voted “on matters of interest to Rezko” and a co-defendant, Stuart Levine. Those members are Abboud and Carriglio, according to sources and records.

The donors either declined to comment or could not be reached.

Obama has been dogged by questions about Rezko since November, after it became known that Rezko played a role in the purchase of Obama’s house in Kenwood. Rezko’s wife, Rita, and Obama purchased adjoining lots on the same day in June 2005, and Rita Rezko later sold a strip of the land to Obama so he could expand his yard.

“We’ve made our best effort to run the most ethical campaign possible in all ways and release donations when appropriate.

Bill Maher | February 8 2008 | Part Six

Al Gore, Barack Obama, Bin Laden, Blogs, Buffoonery, Douchebaggery, Election 2008, France, Healthcare, Hillary Clinton, Humor, McCain, Neocon, Politics, Right-Wing Talking Points, Scaife, Tullycast, Wall Street, Writers

Part Six

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank

Bill Maher | February 8 2008 | Part Five

Al Gore, Barack Obama, Bin Laden, Blogs, Buffoonery, Douchebaggery, Election 2008, France, Healthcare, Hillary Clinton, Humor, McCain, Neocon, Politics, Right-Wing Talking Points, Scaife, Tullycast, Wall Street, Writers

Bill Maher | February 8 2008 | O V E R T I M E

Al Gore, Barack Obama, Bin Laden, Blogs, Buffoonery, Douchebaggery, Election 2008, France, Healthcare, Hillary Clinton, Humor, McCain, Neocon, Politics, Right-Wing Talking Points, Scaife, Tullycast, Wall Street, Writers

O V E R T I M E

Bill Maher | February 8 2008 | Part Four

Al Gore, Barack Obama, Bin Laden, Blogs, Buffoonery, Douchebaggery, Election 2008, France, Healthcare, Hillary Clinton, Humor, McCain, Neocon, Politics, Right-Wing Talking Points, Scaife, Tullycast, Wall Street, Writers
Bill Maher Part Four

Bill Maher | February 8 2008 | Part Three

Al Gore, Barack Obama, Bin Laden, Blogs, Buffoonery, Douchebaggery, Election 2008, France, Healthcare, Hillary Clinton, Humor, McCain, Neocon, Politics, Right-Wing Talking Points, Scaife, Tullycast, Wall Street, Writers

Bill Maher | February 8 2008 | Part Three

Bill Maher | February 8 2008 | Part Two

Al Gore, Barack Obama, Bin Laden, Blogs, Buffoonery, Douchebaggery, Election 2008, France, Healthcare, Hillary Clinton, Humor, McCain, Neocon, Politics, Right-Wing Talking Points, Scaife, Tullycast, Wall Street, Writers