The Mainstream Press Finally Recognizes "The Larry Sinclair Problem"

Barack Obama, Election 2008, FCC, Howard Stern, Larry Sinclair, Lynn Samuels, National Press Club, Politics, Sirius Radio, Tim Russert, XM
Print This Article

Larry Sinclair to Reveal Corroborating Information on His Illegal Drug Use With Obama

— Despite death threats and an organized campaign to prevent him from speaking publicly, Larry Sinclair – on June 18, 2008, at 2:00 PM (sign-up starting at 1 PM) in the Holeman Lounge of the National Press Club, 529 14th Street NW, Washington, DC 20045, will for the first time reveal the corroborating evidence for his claim that on November 6 + 7, 1999, Larry: (i) met Obama at a gay bar where Barack Obama arranged for the purchase of federal Schedule II drugs, (ii) which Larry and Obama thereafter ingested and (iii) then engaged in hi-risk, homosexual activities.Larry’s story burst on to the scene on January 18, 2008, when Larry released a short video containing these allegations on YouTube.com. That video has had close to a million views yet the mainstream media has completely ignored Larry’s serious allegations. Thereafter, a clearly orchestrated campaign to discredit Larry began on the internet which forced Larry to resort to federal court to protect his reputation.

At the press conference, Larry will (i) reveal the corroborating evidence for his allegations regarding Obama, (ii) address the time-line of the response of the Obama campaign to his allegations and the murder of Donald Young, the openly gay choir director of Trinity United Church of Christ, Obama’s now-former church and (iii) the significance of the refusal of U.S. District Court Judge Henry H. Kennedy, Jr. to allow Larry’s case to proceed.

SOURCE Center for Forfeiture Law

Montgomery Blair Sibley of the Center for Forfeiture Law, +1-202-508-3699, +1-202-478-0371 (FAX), SIBLEY@CIVILFORFEITURE.COM,

" These Are Not The Drugs You're Looking For "

9/11, Barack Obama, Election 2008, Hillary Clinton, Politics, Tullycast


Bill Maher's RealTime | March 7 2008 | O V E R T I M E

Barack Obama, Blackwater USA, Election 2008, Hillary Clinton, Internet, Jeremy Scahill, Joe Scarborough, NPR, O V E R T I M E, Politics, Spitzer, Terry McAuliffe, The Wire, Vice President

Sen Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) revives campaign with Ohio, Texas wins

Barack Obama, Election 2008, Hillary Clinton, Ohio, Politics, Steve-O, Texas
MSN Tracking Image
MSNBC.com

N.Y. senator also takes Rhode Island, NBC projects; Obama wins Vermont

1cb55ac245c5af97429453d37264.jpeg

BREAKING NEWS
NBC News and MSNBC
updated 12:51 a.m. ET, Wed., March. 5, 2008

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton threw up a roadblock on Sen. Barack Obama’s path to the Democratic presidential nomination by winning the giant Ohio and Texas primaries, NBC News projected Wednesday morning.

“For everyone here in Ohio and across America who’s been counted out and refused to be knocked out, and for everyone who has stumbled but stood right back up, and for everyone who works hard and never gives up, this one is for you,” Clinton said at a raucous rally in Columbus on a night when she took both of the two major prizes on offer.

Clinton, D-N.Y., and Obama, D-Ill., split the smaller Rhode Island and Vermont primaries, according to NBC News .

Delegates to the Democratic National Convention are awarded proportionally, and those numbers will not be available until all returns are in. Going into Tuesday’s balloting, Obama led Clinton by 1,194-1,037, according to NBC News’ count.

Meanwhile, Sen. John McCain of Arizona wrapped up the Republican nomination after he won all four contests, NBC News projected. His only remaining serious rival, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, withdrew from the race Tuesday night.

Ohio results unclear amid confusion
In all, there were 370 Democratic delegates at stake Tuesday night, most of them in Ohio and Texas, where Clinton had banked on stemming Obama’s momentum.

Balloting was described as confusing across Ohio, where election workers reported a record turnout of voters asked to use new or unfamiliar methods to tabulate votes after the turmoil of the 2000 election.

Voting was also described as confusing in Texas, where nearly half of delegates were being chosen in evening caucuses after the polls closed. The Clinton campaign alleged that Obama supporters were confiscating precinct chairmen’s manuals at the caucuses, as well as locking out Clinton supporters.

The process did not discourage Texas Democrats, who, because the nomination remained open, had their first chance in many years to have an impact on the contest. It appeared that the turnout would set a state record, and some polling places were still open more than two hours after closing time to accommodate voters waiting in line.

“This is the first time that I can remember, maybe in the last 20 years, that voting in the Democratic primary, as I have, makes such a big difference in the national election,” said Robin Melvin, a voter in Austin.

Candidates hold bases in exit polls
Just a few weeks ago, Clinton had a strong lead in Ohio and Texas polls, and her campaign expected the states to stand as bulwarks against Obama’s string of victories that gained momentum on Super Tuesday.

 

Final polls going into Tuesday’s voting showed he had closed the margin significantly, but surveys of voters as they left their polling places in Ohio indicated that Clinton held onto her robust support from groups that have been the foundation of her candidacy, taking strong margins among white, blue-collar and older voters.

The Ohio exit polls showed that Obama did not do as well as he had in recent contests in eroding her support from those groups. Clinton also did a bit better among Ohio voters who chose their candidate in recent days, suggesting that she may have benefited from her aggressive attacks on what she called his lack of seasoning.

In Texas, the two candidates did best in parts of the state where they spent the most time campaigning — Clinton in predominantly Latino South Texas and Obama in major metropolitan areas and Austin, the capital and the state’s most liberal city. And they did well among their core constituencies.

Clinton ran especially strong among Latinos, whom she had counted on in a state where she and former President Bill Clinton have political ties dating to the early 1970s. Exit polls indicated that she was winning two-thirds of the Latino vote. Likewise, Obama won by strong margins among black voters, with a nearly 6-to-1 edge.

The difference may have been in the demographics: African-Americans accounted for 20 percent of the Democratic primary voters, but Latinos made up more than 30 percent.

 

“I think tonight’s going to be a huge night,” said Terry McAuliffe, Clinton’s campaign chairman.

“It feels very good,” he said in an interview on MSNBC. “I think we’re going to win both Texas and Ohio.”

But Obama sounded a confident note Tuesday night, telling cheering supporters in San Antonio that the race was still a toss-up.

“No matter what happens tonight, we have nearly the same delegate lead as we did this morning, and we are on our way to winning this nomination,” he said.

David Axelrod, a senior adviser to Obama, argued that the Ohio result actually demonstrated Obama’s strength, noting that pre-election polls showed him trailing Clinton by as many as 20 points just three weeks ago.

In an interview with NBC News, Axelrod predicted that the night would end up being a “wash,” saying nothing would be decided until primaries later in Wyoming, Mississippi and Pennsylvania.

Ohio, Texas critical for Clinton
Some of Clinton’s supporters — her husband, the former president, among them — agreed that she needed to outpoll Obama in both Texas and Ohio to sustain her candidacy.

“We’re going on, we’re going strong, and we’re going all the way,” she said.

But Obama was just as optimistic.

“We can stand up with confidence and clarity,” he said “We are on our way to winning this nomination.”

It takes 2,025 delegates to win the Democratic nomination, and slightly more than 600 remained to be picked in the 10 states that vote after Tuesday.

var url=location.href;var i=url.indexOf(‘/did/’) + 1;if(i==0){i=url.indexOf(‘/print/1/’) + 1;}if(i==0){i=url.indexOf(‘&print=1’);}if(i>0){url = url.substring(0,i);document.write(‘URL: ‘+url+’

‘);if(window.print){window.print()}else{alert(‘To print his page press Ctrl-P on your keyboard nor choose print from your browser or device after clicking OK’);}}URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23463159/


© 2008 MSNBC.com

02/29/2008 | Bill Maher | Complete+O V E R T I M E

Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Blogs, Broadcatching, Castro, Cuba, David Frum, Democrats, Dick Cheney, Douglas Feith, Election 2008, Elliot Abrams, Farrakan, FISA, George Bush, Guantanamo, Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Lobbyists, Nedra Pickler, Neocon, New York Times, Osama Bin Laden, Peter Hoekstra, PNAC, Politics, Richard Mellon Scaife, Rush Limbaugh, Saddam Hussein, Tullycast, Weekly Standard

Bill Maher | February 22, 2008 | Complete w/ New Rules and Overtime

9/11, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Blogs, Broadcatching, Castro, Cuba, David Frum, Democrats, Dick Cheney, Douglas Feith, Election 2008, Elliot Abrams, FISA, George Bush, Guantanamo, Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Lobbyists, Neocon, New York Times, Osama Bin Laden, PNAC, Politics, Richard Mellon Scaife, Rush Limbaugh, Saddam Hussein, Tullycast, Weekly Standard, Youtube

Part One

Part Two

Part Three

Part Four

Part Five

Part Six

New Rules

O V E R T I M E

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank

Tullycast

Andrew Tully, Baker Botts, Barack Obama, Bechtel, Bill Clinton, Carlyle Group, CIA, Dick Cheney, Don Rumsfeld, Douglas Feith, Duke Ziebert, Election 2008, Elliot Abrams, Halliburton, Hillary Clinton, Iran/Contra, Joe Wilson, John McCain, Judith Miller, Karl Rove, KBR, Kellogg Brown and Root, Lee Atwater, Osama Bin Laden, PNAC, Politics, Richard Mellon Scaife, Saddam Hussein, Scooter Libby, Tullycast, Tullycasts, Valerie Plame, Viveca Novak, Watergate, Youtube

Bill Maher | February 15 2008 + New Rules

Andrew Sullivan, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Buffonery, D.C., Election 2008, Frank Luntz, George W. Bush, Hillary Clinton, Iraq, John McCain, MSM, Politics, Tullycast, Writers Strike

Part One

Part Two

Part Three

Part Four

Part Five

Part Six

NEW RULES

O V E R T I M E  

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank

Ambassador Joseph Wilson Endorses Hillary Clinton; Calls Her "Battle Tested"

Barack Obama, David Corn, Dick Cheney, Douglas Feith, Election 2008, Elliot Abrams, Hillary Clinton, Jane Hamsher, Joe Wilson, John McCain, Judge Thomas F. Hogan, Judith Millaer, Karl Rove, Marcy Wheeler, Matt Cooper, Patrick Fitzgerald, Richard Mellon Scaife, Robert Luskin, Robert Novak, Scooter Libby, The District, Tim Russert, Viveca Novak

BaltimoreSun.com

wilsons.jpg

Battle-tested

Hillary Clinton fought the Republican attack machine, and emerged stronger

By Joseph C. Wilson IV

February 12, 2008

With the emergence of Sen. John McCain as the presumptive Republican nominee, the choice for the Democrats in the 2008 presidential election now shifts to who is best positioned to beat him, in what promises to be a more hard-fought campaign – and perhaps a nastier one – than Democrats anticipated.

Sen. Barack Obama’s promise of transformation and an end of partisan politics has its seductive appeal. The Bush-Cheney era, after all, has been punctuated by smear campaigns, character assassinations and ideological fervor.

Nobody dislikes such poisonous partisanship, especially in foreign policy, more than I do. I am one of very few Foreign Service officers to have served as ambassador in the administrations of both George H. W. Bush and Bill Clinton, yet I have spent the past four years fighting a concerted character assassination campaign orchestrated by the George W. Bush White House.

Sen. Hillary Clinton is one of the few who fully understood the stakes in that battle. Time and again, she reached out to my wife – outed CIA officer Valerie Plame Wilson – and me to remind us that as painful as the attacks were, we simply could not allow ourselves to be driven from the public square by bullying. Mrs. Clinton knew from experience, having spent the better part of the past 20 years fighting the Republican attack machine. She is a fighter.

But will Mr. Obama fight? His brief time on the national scene gives little comfort. Consider a February 2006 exchange of letters with Mr. McCain on the subject of ethics reform. The wrathful Mr. McCain accused Mr. Obama of being “disingenuous,” to which Mr. Obama meekly replied, “The fact that you have now questioned my sincerity and my desire to put aside politics for the public interest is regrettable but does not in any way diminish my deep respect for you.”

Mr. McCain was insultingly dismissive but successful in intimidating his inexperienced colleague. Thus, in his one known face-to-face encounter with Mr. McCain, Mr. Obama failed to stand his ground.

What gives us confidence that Mr. Obama will be stronger the next time he faces Mr. McCain, a seasoned political fighter with extensive national security credentials? Even more important, what special disadvantages does Mr. Obama carry into this contest on questions of national security?

How will Mr. Obama answer Mr. McCain about his careless remark about unilaterally bombing Pakistan – perhaps blowing up an already difficult relationship with a nuclear state threatened by Islamic extremists? How will Mr. Obama respond to charges made by the Kenyan government that his campaigning activities in Kenya in support of his distant cousin running for president there made him “a stooge” and constituted interference in the politics of an important and besieged ally in the war on terror?

How will he answer charges that his desire for unstructured personal summits without preconditions with a host of America’s adversaries, from Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to Kim Jong Il, would be little more than premature capitulation?

Contrary to the myth of the Obama campaign, 2008 is not the year for transcendental transformation. The task for the next administration will be to repair the damage done by eight years of radical rule. And the choice for Americans is clear: four more years of corrupt Republican rule, senseless wars, evisceration of the Constitution, emptying of the national treasury – or rebuilding our government and our national reputation, piece by piece.

In order to effect practical change against a determined adversary, we do not need a would-be philosopher-king but a seasoned gladiator who understands the fight Democrats will face in the fall campaign and in governing.

Theodore Roosevelt once said, “It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again … who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly.”

If he were around today, Roosevelt might be speaking of the woman in the arena. Hillary Clinton has been in that arena for a generation. She is one of the few to have defeated the attack machine that is today’s Republican Party and to have emerged stronger. She is deeply knowledgeable about governing; she made herself into a power in the Senate; she is respected by our military; and she never flinches. She has never been intimidated, not by any Republican – not even John McCain.

Barack Obama claims to represent the future, but it should be increasingly evident that he is not the man for this moment, especially with Mr. McCain’s arrival. We’ve seen a preview of that contest already. It was a TKO.

Bill Maher | February 8 2008 | HQ

Barack Obama, Democrats, Election 2008, GOP, Hillary Clinton, Karl Rove, Politics, Scaife

Part One

Part Two

Part Three

Part Four

Part Five

Part Six

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank