Artie Lange and Baba Booey Attacked in Afghanistan

Stories

No Injuries Reported as Convoy is Attacked After USO Show

Howard Stern comics bombed, no joke

NEW YORK DAILY NEWS

Thursday, July 3rd 2008, 4:00 AM

Howard Stern nearly lost his closest cohorts in Afghanistan this week.

Stern’s Sirius radio show producer Gary Dell’Abate, show regular Artie Lange and comedians Nick DiPaolo, Jim Florentine and Dave Attell had just finished a comedy show for troops in Kandahar when the base came under attack.

“Everything was going fine until the end,” a friend of the comics, who heard from them by cell phone, tells us. “They were all done with their sets, and they were headed in a car convoy to a meet-and-greet elsewhere, but they only made it about 20 yards.

“The military base they were on came under mortar fire, and the convoy was turned around.”

Troops led the comics into a secure bunker, where they all waited for a very unfunny 35 minutes as the shelling continued.

Eventually it stopped, and the comedians, all uninjured, went on to continue the USO/Armed Forces Entertainment tour at other undisclosed locations in the Persian Gulf. Tony Burton, Dell’Abate’s rep, confirmed the incident but couldn’t comment.

Before they left for Afghanistan, callers like lawyer Dominic Barbara phoned in to the Stern show and wondered if the comics, especially those like Dell’Abate, who has children, should be risking their lives.

But Dell’Abate seemed most concerned about the 22-hour flight to the country, saying he’d never flown longer than seven hours.

Lange seemed most worried about what material they could use, given the Army’s orders not to make jokes involving President Bush, sex, race, religion, drugs or drinking.

Any safety fears he may have had surely disappeared when he heard how desperate the troops are for entertainment. In fact, when the soldiers heard they were getting a show, they were ecstatic, according to the Stern fan site Marksfriggin.com.

So far, Scarlett Johansson, Robin Williams, Kid Rock, Toby Keith, Morgan Freeman, Jessica Simpson, Kelli Pickler and bands O.A.R. and Five for Fighting have been among the few courageous enough to go to the war zones to bring soldiers a bit of cheer.

But Stern himself may have had the last word on the tour when he joked, “Why is Gary going, anyway? He’s not even funny.”

No worries: Dell’Abate is serving as the tour’s emcee.

From Secret Deals With Big Oil in The White House to Permanent Bases in Iraq

Stories

Think Progress

Engel: Permanent Bases Would Technically Be Iraqi With U.S.
‘Tenants’ As ‘A Face Saving Device

On Thursday, the UK Independent’s Patrick Cockburn reported on “a secret deal being
negotiated in Baghdad” that “would perpetuate the American
military occupation of Iraq indefinitely.” According to Cockburn,
the deal result in American soldiers being stationed on permanent bases in Iraq:

Iraqi officials fear that the accord, under which US
troops would occupy permanent bases, conduct military operations,
arrest Iraqis and enjoy immunity from Iraqi law, will destabilise
Iraq’s position in the Middle East and lay the basis for unending
conflict in their country.

On the same day, NPR’s Diane Rehm asked
NBC News Middle East correspondent Richard Engel about the report.
Engel said that as part of “a face saving device,” the
bases would technically be Iraqi and “U.S. troops would reside on
them as tenants”:

ENGEL: That’s the question, is it permanent bases or is it not, and the details of this have not been published. The
U.S. and Iraqi officials I’ve spoken to say they would not be
U.S. permanent bases in Iraq, they would be Iraqi bases and that U.S.
troops would reside on them as tenants and may even have to pay some
sort of nominal rent, so there would be a face saving device.

What’s also trying to be worked out is what’s the exact
U.S. mission. Would they be able to conduct independent operations
without the advice and consultation of the Iraqi government and that
has been a point of contention.

After Cockburn’s report was released, U.S. Ambassador to Iraq,
Ryan Crocker, tried to quash talk of permanent U.S. bases, telling
reporters that “it is not going to be forever.”
But Crocker also spoke of a situation that could comport with
Engel’s “face saving” description, claiming that
“there isn’t going to be an agreement that infringes on
Iraqi sovereignty.”

Transcript:

REHM: Here’s an email from James asking about an
article published today in the Independent in UK by Patrick Coburn and
it’s entitled, Revealed: Secret Plan To Keep Iraq Under U.S.
Control. Do you know about this?

ENGEL: I don’t know the article, but I know Patrick Cockburn,
he’s a friend and a fine reporter. Is this, I’ll take a
look at the article.

REHM: Just published today and our communicator in Raleigh says, “why has this not received more attention?”

ENGEL: I know what he’s talking about. This is the strategic
long term agreement that is being negotiated between Iraq and the
United States. This is a deal that is supposed to be, and we have
reported it, I think NBC News was the first to report this, it was, it
is a long term strategic alliance that is being hammered out, mostly in
secret in Baghdad. And that has many, many Iraqis concerned, it has
some U.S. officials concerned as well. The U.S. negotiators that
I’ve spoken to who are involved in this insist that it is not a
treaty, that it will not commit large numbers of U.S. forces to Iraq
for a long time, but it does clarify what the role of U.S. forces will
be for a long period going forward.

REHM: I.E.

ENGEL: That’s the question, is it permanent bases or is it
not, and the details of this have not been published. The U.S. and
Iraqi officials I’ve spoken to say they would not be U.S.
permanent bases in Iraq, they would be Iraqi bases and that U.S. troops
would reside on them as tenets and may even have to pay some sort of
nominal rent, so there would be a face saving device. What’s also
trying to be worked out is what’s the exact U.S. mission. Would
they be able to conduct independent operations without the advice and
consultation of the Iraqi government and that has been a point of
contention.

DOZIER: I know a member of Crocker’s team has been working on
this for about a year behind the scenes. And one of the major sticking
points is what law will apply to U.S. troops, how much will they be
able to do on their own, how much will they have to…they want of
course the rights that they have right now, to stage their own
missions, their own raids, without getting anybody’s say so, just
informing, “We’re headed off, we’re going to do
this.” The Iraqis are pushing for approval of everything and also
that Iraqi law would apply to soldiers, Marines who conduct violent
acts.

Kos Jumps a Shark

Stories

[Ed. note: I’ve liked Markos since I used to read his baby blog and before he basically
invented the Netroots. With that said, this may not just be his “Jump the Shark” moment but it may also be some of the worst writing in the history of the game]

Daily Kos: State of the Nation

Rewarding good behavior
by kos
Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 11:05:46 AM PDT

So many of you are upset that I pulled back my credit card last night, making a last minute decision to hold back on a $2,300 contribution to Obama. Let me explain further:

First of all, obviously Obama is a great candidate who is running a great 50-state race. That much cannot be denied. But he’s had a rough couple of weeks.

First, he reversed course and capitulated on FISA, not just turning back on the Constitution, but on the whole concept of “leadership”. Personally, I like to see presidents who 1) lead, and 2) uphold their promises to protect the Constitution.

Then, he took his not-so-veiled swipe at MoveOn in his “patriotism” speech.

Finally, he reinforced right-wing and media talking points that Wes Clark had somehow impugned McCain’s military service when, in reality, Clark had done no such thing.

All of a sudden, there was a lot of cowering when, just days ago, we got to read this:

When Mr. Wenner asked how Mr. Obama might respond to harsh attacks from Republicans, suggesting that Democrats have “cowered” in the past, Mr. Obama replied, “Yeah, I don’t do cowering.”

Could’ve fooled me, and maybe he is. Maybe what looks like cowering to me is really part of that “moving to the center” stuff everyone keeps talking about. But there is a line between “moving to the center” and stabbing your allies in the back out of fear of being criticized. And, of late, he’s been doing a lot of unecessary stabbing, betraying his claims of being a new kind of politician. Not that I ever bought it, but Obama is now clearly not looking much different than every other Democratic politician who has ever turned his or her back on the base in order to prove centrist bona fides. That’s not an indictment, just an observation.

Now I know there’s a contingent around here that things Obama can do no wrong, and he must never be criticized, and if you do, well fuck you! I respect the sentiment, but will respectfully disagree. We’re allowed to do that here. But fair notice — I will never pull a Rush Limbaugh and carry water for anyone. Not for the Democratic Congress, and not for our future Democratic president. When anyone does something I don’t care for, I will say so. I’ve never pulled my punches before, so why start now?

Obama will be fine without my contribution, and he may even still get it before this thing is said and done, but it would be at a time when he has done something positive. That’s called rewarding good behavior. And if that opportunity fails to arise because Obama goes on a Sister Souljah’ing rampage, then no worries. Chances are good that the DNC would get the money instead. But at this time, I simply have no desire to reward bad behavior. Some of you don’t care about his behavior, or don’t think it’s bad behavior, or whatever. I didn’t ask any of you to follow suit, and don’t care whether you do or not. I didn’t pull him from the Orange to Blue list. I’m not going to start praising Nader or Barr. I’ll still vote for him. Yadda, yadda, yadda. At the end of the day, I’m pretty irrelevant in the whole affair. Obama is going to raise a ton of dough and win this thing whether I send him money or not.

Ultimately, he’s currently saying that he doesn’t need people like me to win this thing, and he’s right. He doesn’t. If they’ve got polling or whatnot that says that this is his best path to victory, so much the better. I want him to win big. But when the Obama campaign makes those calculations, they have to realize that they’re going to necessarily lose some intensity of support. It’s not all upside. And for me, that is reflected in a lack of interest in making that contribution.

That’s it. No need to freak out. It is what it is. Others will happily pick up the slack. We’re headed toward a massive Democratic wave, and what I decide to do with my money means next to nothing, no matter how much hyperventilating may happen on this site’s comments and diaries about it all.

And if for some crazy hard-to-see reason my money actually is important to the Obama campaign, then they can adjust their behavior to get it.

The New York Times Blog Reacts to Sy Hersh's Latest Act of Journalism

Stories

More
than two years after his reporting stoked worries that there might be
another American war in the Middle East, Seymour Hersh is getting a lot
of attention with another installment in this week’s New Yorker titled “Preparing the Battlefield.”

In 2006,
his major revelation was that the United States had accelerated
military planning against Iran. His new article focuses on a “major
escalation” of covert activities against Iran following a finding, or
declaration, signed by President Bush late last year. The operations
are detailed by anonymous sources (read the full article here), including one who provided the big picture:

“The Finding was focused on undermining Iran’s nuclear
ambitions and trying to undermine the government through regime
change,” a person familiar with its contents said, and it involved
“working with opposition groups and passing money.”

Congressional leaders on intelligence,
including some key Democrats, have backed the finding by approving $400
million to carry it out, the article said. Already there are fervent
protests on left-leaning blogs similar to those voiced after the warrantless wiretapping program was revealed: “But what about Congressional oversight?”

The larger concern, of course, is whether the White House is laying
the groundwork for an attack before the Bush administration leaves
office.

While the article states that “clandestine operations against Iran
are not new,” it also says there are “serious questions” in Congress
about whether American forces are going too far. Since the Bush
administration does not seek oversight for covert military activities,
Mr. Hersh wrote that “Congress has been given only a partial view of
how the money it authorized may be used.”

The administration, the C.I.A. and lawmakers declined to comment on
the report, but Ryan C. Crocker, the American ambassador to Iraq,
responded on CNN on Sunday. “I can tell you flatly that U.S. forces are
not operating across the Iraqi border into Iran, in the south or
anywhere else,” he said.

The article refers to “a secret military task force … operating in
Iran” and an anonymous member of Congress drawing the line thusly: “No
lethal action, period” inside the country. Senior American officials “may not tell the ambassador everything” going on inside Iran, Mr. Hersh suggested on CNN on Sunday.

The Iranian government seemed to be observing the back-and-forth
with great interest. Press TV, a satellite channel sponsored by Iran’s
state-run television operation, quickly published reports on the piece, Mr. Crocker’s reaction and a more run-of-the-mill threat from an Iranian general who announced that the military was “digging 320,000 graves for invaders.”

The article by Mr. Hersh, who uncovered the My Lai massacre in
Vietnam in 1969, prompted outrage on the left and dismissals on the
right. “IT’S HERSH,” Redstate, a frequent critic of Mr. Hersh, wrote. “COME ON!” The blogger was referring to some criticisms that he has a tendency to inflate information that is critical of the government.

Several bloggers seemed aware of the issue, warning readers that the
important news on Congressional approval of the covert operations seems
to be mixed with less reliable information.

Regarding one part of the article that mentions a meeting held by
Vice President Cheney on “how to create a casus belli between Tehran
and Washington,” Isaac Chotiner of The New Republic asks,
“Why is this buried at the very end of the piece? Why is not followed
up on even slightly?” And Foreign Policy magazine’s lead blogger, Blake
Hounshell, linked to the New Yorker story with a reservation: “Let’s just say that it’s far from certain the United States is doing what he claims.”

Laura Rozen, a national security writer, included further caution on a source quoted several times in the article, Sam Gardiner, a retired Air Force colonel.
“In the end, I just don’t think the Bush administration is trying to
seriously destabilize the Iranian regime or change it,” Ms. Rozen
wrote.

The conclusion echoed a news analysis in The New York Times a day after it reported that Israel had held a military exercise seemingly aimed at Iran.

As it happens, Ms. Rozen asked several experts about the possibility
of a U.S. attack on Iran for an article on MotherJones.com just before
the Hersh piece emerged. With sound bites like “very, very unlikely,” “quite low,” “less rather than more likely,” there was far less alarm than in The New Yorker.

But there were quite a few caveats in their comments as well,
reflecting that no outsider to the decision-making process can judge
the matter with assurance. And in any case, there’s a wild card:
Israel. Or as Jacqueline Shire, one of the analysts talking to Mother
Jones, said: “In short, who knows?”

Settlement in NY lawsuit over NBC's 'Predator'

Stories

NEW YORK (AP) NBC Universal has settled a $105 million lawsuit
brought by a woman who claimed ”Dateline NBC: To Catch A
Predator” led her brother to kill himself after camera crews and
police officers showed up at his home in a televised sex sting.

”The matter has been amicably resolved to the satisfaction of
both parties,” said a statement released by both sides.

Terms of the agreement were not disclosed.

Patricia Conradt’s lawsuit had claimed her brother, an assistant
prosecutor in suburban Dallas, fatally shot himself after he was
accused of engaging in a sexually explicit online chat with an
adult posing as a 13-year-old boy.

The lawsuit claimed NBC ”steamrolled” authorities to arrest
Louis William Conradt Jr. after telling police he failed to show up
at a sting operation 35 miles away.

NBC was working with the activist group Perverted Justice on the
sting, in which people impersonating children established online
chats with men and tried to lure them to a house, where they were
met by TV cameras and police.

In February, a federal judge issued a scathing ruling in the
case, saying a jury might conclude the network ”crossed the line
from responsible journalism to irresponsible and reckless intrusion
into law enforcement.”

U.S. District Judge Denny Chin said the lawsuit contained
sufficient facts to make it plausible that the suicide was
foreseeable, that police had a duty to protect Conradt from killing
himself and that the officers and NBC acted with deliberate
indifference.

New episodes of ”To Catch A Predator” ended in December, with
the future of the series uncertain.

”Right now we are working on other investigative stories
focusing on national security and the economy,” NBC spokeswoman
Jenny Tartikoff said in an e-mail. ”If we do more, we want to make
sure we are complementing past investigations not just repeating
them.”

Redskin Sean Taylor's Murder Investigation Snags Fifth Suspect

Stories

5th person charged in Redskins safety’s killing

MIAMI (AP) — Prosecutors in Miami say a fifth person has been charged in the slaying of Washington Redskins star Sean Taylor.

Miami-Dade County State Attorney’s Office spokesman Ed Griffith says Wednesday that 16-year-old Timothy Brown is charged with first-degree murder under a sealed warrant.

Taylor died of massive blood loss after he was shot at his Miami-area home during a botched robbery in November. The 24-year-old safety had made the Pro Bowl in 2006 and 2007.

Brown is being held in Lee County. It’s not immediately known when he’ll be transferred to Miami-Dade County to face the charge.

Trial for the other four suspects is set for Aug. 25. Prosecutors have said they will not seek the death penalty.

Grateful Dead's archives have final resting place at UC-Santa Cruz – San Jose Mercury News

Stories

SAN JOSE MERCURY NEWS (YES!)

The Grateful Dead’s long strange trip through American popular culture is landing in a library at the University of California-Santa Cruz, preserved for future generations of study by scholars and stoners.

Three decades worth of archival materials – from business records to stage backdrops – have been donated by the band to the school’s McHenry Library, where a room called Dead Central is being dedicated to a beloved band dubbed “the largest unofficial religion in the world.”

UC-Santa Cruz Chancellor George Blumenthal joined Dead drummer Mickey Hart and guitarist and singer Bob Weir in a buoyant press conference Thursday at San Francisco’s aging Fillmore Auditorium, the site of 51 Dead concerts. In honor of the event, Blumenthal was given a tie-dyed T-shirt.

“All of this stuff doesn’t belong to us – it belongs to the culture that spawned us,” Weir said. “It seemed like getting it into a campus archive, with access for the people in the community that gave rise to it, was the right thing to do.”

The seaside campus was the “most enthusiastic” and “organized,” which helped it edge out two heavyweight suitors, Stanford and UC-Berkeley, Weir said.

“Santa Cruz is the seat of the neo-bohemian culture that we’re a facet of,” Weir said. “So there could not have been a more cozy place for this collection to land.”

The gift does not contain any of the band’s vast musical recordings; those are stored in a Southern California vault belonging to producer Rhino Entertainment. The university said it will work with Rhino on how to access musical material.

But it does contain valuable artifacts that document the band’s ascendance into one of California’s most durable and influential musical phenomena. Currently held in a 2,000-square-foot San Rafael warehouse, the collection includes the Dead’s first recording contract, life-size skeletons of band members used in the 1987 “Touch of Grey” video, and an estimated 50,000 to 75,000 fan letters from around the world, many decorated with elaborate art.

“What you’ll see is our conversation with the people who loved us, and vice versa,” Hart said.

A blue-chip team including several Silicon Valley-based fans – among them venture capitalist and musician Roger McNamee – will oversee a $2 million fundraising campaign for the archive. Seagate Technology CEO Bill Watkins has volunteered technical support.

Formal academics never meant much to the Dead.

But fans say their image-rich lyrics about such themes as love, trust and rebirth are worthy of scholarship. The song “Box of Rain” is as central to Deadheads as Allen Ginsberg’s “Howl” was to Beats and T.S. Eliot’s “The Waste Land” was to Modernists.

For musicologists, there is value in studying how the Dead’s repertoire updated many of the nation’s older musical traditions, from bluegrass to jazz, said Fred Lieberman, a UC-Santa Cruz music professor. “They were the quintessential American band,” said Lieberman, who first proposed the archive idea to Hart, with whom he has collaborated on three books. This will boost the university’s scholarship on American culture, he said.

However, the gift may do little to help the university shed its image as a mecca of hacky sack and patchouli oil – and, in fact, is likely to attract a tie-dyed pilgrimage. In recent years, the school has worked to refocus attention on its ambitious scientific research efforts. It has even cracked down on its traditional April marijuana smoke-in at Porter Meadow, barring non-students and overnight guests.

Campus librarians said they would welcome Deadheads to the grassy lawn outside the library.

The library already has the vast and eclectic archive of the late Aptos composer Lou Harrison, and was looking to expand.

“This is the first step toward having a library that is a destination for scholars interested in studying an important aspect of America’s vernacular music,” he said.

The survival of the archives through turbulent decades is due to a devoted staffer named Eileen Law, who was hired in 1972 to take care of the Deadheads and who worked with the band for the next 34 years.

Among other jobs, she tended the mail that flooded into a San Rafael post office box.

“Pretty soon I found myself being the keeper of everything – press clips, posters, all their vinyl. I kept getting more and more stuff,” she said. “Everything I could collect, I did.”

At the press conference, UC-Santa Cruz librarians assured Law, who is unemployed, that she’ll play an important role in the cataloging of the material.

“I had faith that something good would someday happen to it,” Law said, grinning.

Fans rejoiced at the news of the gift – and instantly began offering their own contributions to the collection.

“Can we submit material?” one fan asked on the band’s Web site. “I have my own stash – much of it from the parking lot scene, ’83-’95.”

IF YOU’RE INTERESTED

See library.ucsc.edu/speccoll/GD_archive.html or e-mail grateful@ucsc.edu.


Contact Lisa M. Krieger at lkrieger@mercurynews.com or (408) 920-5565.
SJMN

April 18, 2008 | Bill Maher | Part One

Stories


Catholic University, Hosting Pope, Keeps Dissenters Off Campus

Stories

BLOOMBERG

By Nadine Elsibai

April 17 (Bloomberg) — Pope Benedict XVI will get the
royal treatment today when he speaks at Catholic University of
America in Washington. Actor Stanley Tucci got the hook.

Tucci, the star of “Big Night,” was prevented from
taking part in a university forum in 2004 because he favors
abortion rights. He’s not the only one who’s been turned away.
A contractor with the school bookstore in 2003 canceled a talk
by Eleanor Holmes Norton, Washington’s delegate to Congress,
and the university president initially delayed funding a campus
NAACP chapter, both over the abortion issue.

“I don’t think it’s necessary to offer everybody who
believes whatever, especially what is contrary to the church,
the pride of place that a platform on this campus provides,”
said Father David O’Connell, the school’s president.

That policy will make the 121-year-old institution, the
only Vatican-chartered graduate and research center in the
U.S., a fitting host for Benedict XVI, who as cardinal was in
charge of enforcing church doctrine.

Benedict, 81, making his first visit as pope to the U.S.,
will offer a message of encouragement to the heads of the more
than 200 U.S. Catholic colleges and universities and
superintendents of the 195 dioceses in his 5 p.m. address. His
talk follows a Mass he will say at the Washington Nationals
baseball stadium.

While he’s expected to face some protesters during his
Washington visit, including supporters of victims of sexual
abuse by clergymen, many of the 6,400 students at Catholic
University are offering only enthusiasm.

Procession for Pontiff

Three nights ago, 300 students held a candlelight
procession through the campus, with stops to say the rosary, in
honor of the pontiff. The Campus Ministry sold baseball shirts
with his name in block letters across the back to raise money
for its missions. Students in the architectural program
designed the chair he’ll use during his talk.

University officials say that while students are free to
debate contentious issues in the classroom, such views
shouldn’t be highlighted elsewhere.

That policy was evident in October 2004. O’Connell halted
plans to invite Tucci to speak at a seminar on the Italian
cinema, because of his ties to Planned Parenthood, a group that
favors abortion rights, said Victor Nakas, a university
spokesman.

Contrary Positions

“Catholic institutions should not honor people who take
prominent, public positions diametrically opposed to the
Catholic Church’s teachings,” Nakas said.

In February 2003, the scheduled appearance by Norton was
canceled by the bookstore contractor after students complained
about her pro-abortion stance, Nakas said.

In the spring of 2004, students filed a petition seeking a
campus chapter of the NAACP. The request wasn’t honored until
O’Connell met with the civil rights organization’s then-
president, Kweisi Mfume, to get assurances that the students
wouldn’t have to follow the group’s national policy endorsing
abortion rights, Nakas said.

Jennifer Plante, Tucci’s publicist, said her client was
unavailable to comment. Tamainia Davis, a spokeswoman for
Norton, and Robert McIntyre, a spokesman for the NAACP, didn’t
immediately provide comment.

“Catholic colleges here are more challenged by the
American notions of academic freedom, which tends to be very
absolutist,” said Patrick Reilly, president of the Cardinal
Newman Society
, a group dedicated to strengthening Catholic
identity at church-affiliated schools.

Georgetown’s Different

That hasn’t stopped Georgetown University, a private
college in Washington run by the Jesuits, from allowing groups
and speakers whose positions don’t always follow the church.
H*yas for Choice, a gay rights and pro-abortion group named
after the school’s Hoyas nickname, recently hosted “Choice
Week” on campus.

Catholic University’s strict environment is relatively
new, said Mark Judge, a 1990 graduate. There was “a lot of
hedonism in the 1980s,” he said.

The “president is an orthodox guy who is faithful to the
magisterium,” said Judge, a Potomac, Maryland, freelance
writer. “Whereas before, that kind of orthodoxy was not
tolerated, now it’s celebrated.”

To contact the reporter on this story:
Nadine Elsibai in Washington at
nelsibai@bloomberg.net.

Bloomberg.com: Exclusive

.

Bill Maher's Final March Show a Doozie

Stories
Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started