KARL ROVE FORCES OWN CHILD TO TESTIFY BEFORE CONGRESS

Stories

White House Aide Won’t Answer Questions of a Senate Panel

 

Published: August 3, 2007

WASHINGTON,
Aug. 2 — J. Scott Jennings, a 29-year-old White House aide,
refused repeatedly on Thursday to answer questions before the Senate
Judiciary Committee, saying he was under orders from President Bush not
to respond.


Brendan Smialowski for The New York Times

J. Scott Jennings, a White House aide, at Thursday’s hearing.

“I must respectfully
decline to respond at this time,” Mr. Jennings said about a dozen
times to questions about the White House’s role in the dismissals
of federal prosecutors. Each time Mr. Jennings was asked about the
removals, he looked at a sheet of paper and said in a rote manner that
he could not reply, “pursuant to President Bush’s directive
invoking executive privilege.”

His appearance before the
committee was the latest act in the ripening showdown between the White
House and Congressional Democrats over the issue of executive privilege.

Mr.
Jennings’s explanation was treated scornfully by the
committee’s Democrats, who said they did not accept Mr.
Bush’s assertion that he has the authority to prevent former and
present officials from testifying to Congress.

Senator Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont, the committee chairman, called the assertion “a bogus claim.”

Mr.
Leahy was especially withering in his criticism of an earlier claim by
Fred F. Fielding, the White House counsel, that Mr. Jennings’s
boss, Karl Rove,
had an even greater claim to the privilege. Mr. Fielding wrote that as
a senior official who has regular access to the president, Mr. Rove had
complete immunity from questioning by Congress.

Mr. Rove had been
subpoenaed to answer questions at Thursday’s session, but did not
appear. Senator Richard J. Durbin, Democrat of Illinois, suggested that
Mr. Rove had left it to Mr. Jennings to take the committee’s
heat.

“Why is he hiding?” Mr. Durbin asked.
“Why does he throw a young staffer like you into the line of fire
while he hides behind the White House curtains?”

Committees
in both the House and the Senate are investigating whether there was
any improper political influence in the dismissals last year of several
federal prosecutors and have sought to determine Mr. Rove’s role
in the deliberations.

Although the issue has split Congress largely along party lines, Senator Arlen Specter
of Pennsylvania, the committee’s ranking Republican, has
criticized the White House approach. Mr. Specter said at the Thursday
hearing that it was important to move ahead with the investigation
because he believed it would end with the resignation of Attorney
General Alberto R. Gonzales, in whom he expressed a lack of confidence.

White House Aide Won’t Answer Questions of a Senate Panel – New York Times

Powered by ScribeFire.

Judge Backs C.I.A. in Suit on Valerie Plame/Wilson Memoir

Stories

Published: August 3, 2007

Valerie Wilson may be the best known former intelligence operative in recent history, but a federal judge in New York ruled Wednesday that she was not allowed to say how long she worked for the Central Intelligence Agency in the memoir she plans to publish this fall.

Although the fact that Ms. Wilson worked for the C.I.A. from 1985 to 2006 has been published in the Congressional Record and elsewhere, the judge, Barbara S. Jones of Federal District Court in Manhattan, said Ms. Wilson was not free to say so.

“The information at issue was properly classified, was never declassified and has not been officially acknowledged by the C.I.A.,” Judge Jones wrote.

Asked whether the ruling would affect the book’s scheduled publication date in October, Adam Rothberg, a spokesman for Ms. Wilson’s publisher, Simon & Schuster, said only that the book would appear “this fall,” suggesting that revisions required by the decision may cause a slight delay. David B. Smallman, a lawyer who represented Ms. Wilson and Simon & Schuster in the suit they had filed to include the information, said his clients had not decided whether to appeal.

C.I.A. employees sign agreements requiring them to submit manuscripts to the agency for permission before they are published. The C.I.A. has publicly acknowledged only that Ms. Wilson worked there from 2002 to January 2006, when she resigned.

But a February 2006 letter from the C.I.A. to Ms. Wilson about her retirement benefits said that she had worked for the agency since Nov. 9, 1985, for a total of “20 years, 7 days,” including “six years, one month and 29 days of overseas service.” The letter was published in the Congressional Record in connection with proposed legislation concerning Ms. Wilson’s benefits, and it remains available on the Library of Congress’s Web site.

Judge Jones acknowledged that the C.I.A. “does not contest that the information is, in fact, in the public domain,” adding that “the public may draw whatever conclusions it might from the fact that the information at issue was sent on C.I.A. letterhead by the chief of retirement and insurance services.”

But she said a classified court filing from Stephen R. Kappes, the deputy director of the C.I.A., which lawyers for Ms. Wilson and her publisher were not allowed to see, contained a reasonable explanation for the agency’s position. Judge Jones did not reveal it, saying only that Mr. Kappes has persuaded her of “the harm to national security which reasonably could be expected if the C.I.A. were to acknowledge the veracity of the information at issue.”

“His explanation is reasonable,” Judge Jones wrote of Mr. Kappes’s secret statement, “and the court sees no reason to disturb his judgment.”

Mr. Rothberg said that aspect of Judge Jones’s ruling was particularly frustrating.

“Trying to argue a case in which the government was able to submit a supersecret affidavit which we were not able to review was like playing an opponent who has 53 cards in his deck,” he said.

The entire decision, he added, “runs counter to the First Amendment, sets a dangerous precedent and creates an unreasonable standard by which the government can disappear public information and rewrite history.”

The C.I.A. apparently had no significant objections to the manuscript beyond the dispute over how long Ms. Wilson worked for it. In a December 2006 letter quoted in Judge Jones’s decision, the agency’s publication review board said the manuscript was “replete with statements” that “become classified when they are linked with a specific time frame.”

A C.I.A. spokesman, Paul Gimigliano, said only that the agency was satisfied with Judge Jones’s decision.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Google Pushes Tailored Phones

Stories

Google Pushes Tailored Phones
To Win Lucrative Ad Market

By AMOL SHARMA and KEVIN J. DELANEY
August 2, 2007; Page A1

Google Inc. is searching for growth in cellphones.

The company, which has made billions of dollars in Web
advertising on computers, is courting wireless operators to carry
handsets customized to Google products, including its search engine,
email and a new mobile Web browser, say people familiar with the plans.
It wants to capture a big chunk of the fast-growing market for ads on
cellphones.

Google has invested hundreds of millions of dollars in
the cellphone project, say people who have been briefed on it. It has
developed prototype handsets, made overtures to operators such as
T-Mobile USA and Verizon Wireless, and talked over technical
specifications with phone manufacturers. It hopes multiple
manufacturers will make devices based on its specs and multiple
carriers will offer them.

For wireless operators, the plans are a double-edged
sword. Google’s powerful brand and its popular Web services could help
operators sign up more subscribers to data packages, on which they
increasingly rely as voice revenue declines. However, operators have
been wary about losing control over the mobile-ad market.

The long-rumored Google phones are still in the
planning stages, and wouldn’t be available to consumers until next year
at the earliest, say people familiar with the idea. Some details are
likely to shift as the plans develop.

The Mountain View, Calif., company has made clear it
is serious about developing advanced software and services for
cellphones. “What’s interesting about the ads in the mobile phone is
that they are twice as profitable or more than the nonmobile phone ads
because they’re more personal,” said Google Chief Executive Eric
Schmidt at the D: All Things Digital conference in May.

A Google spokesman yesterday declined to comment on a
Google phone project, but noted: “We are partnering with almost all of
the carriers and manufacturers to get Google search and other Google
applications onto their devices and networks.”

The Google phone project goes far beyond Google’s
existing deals to include its search engine or applications such as
Maps on select handsets, say the people familiar with the matter.

The company’s past efforts to get its software on
cellphones have raised some concerns in the industry. Verizon Wireless
Chief Executive Lowell McAdam said the carrier has chosen not to
integrate Google’s Web search engine tightly into its phones because of
Google’s demands to get a large share of search-based ad revenue.

“What this really boils down to is a battle for the
mobile ad dollar,” Mr. McAdam said in a recent interview. “They want a
disproportionate share of the revenue.” Mr. McAdam declined to comment
specifically on any Google phones.

Google has announced that it may bid for
wireless-spectrum licenses at a coming government auction. The Federal
Communications Commission on Tuesday approved rules addressing some of
Google’s concerns about the sale.

If it owned spectrum, Google might turn into a phone
operator itself. However, such a project would take years to come to
fruition and cost billions of dollars. For now, Google has to work with
existing cellphone operators to get its mobile products to consumers.

In recent months Google has rolled out mobile versions
of products such as the YouTube video-sharing site. It has made deals
to include its search engine or applications such as Google Maps and
Gmail on select handsets. But the company has sometimes been frustrated
at the limited distribution it has achieved. In some cases, Google has
managed to get around operators. Its 411 location search service can be
accessed by dialing an 800 number from any handset.

Now it is drafting specifications for phones that can
display all of Google’s mobile applications at their best, and it is
developing new software to run on them. The company is conducting much
of the development work at a facility in Boston, and is working on a
sophisticated new Web browser for cellphones, people familiar with the
plans say.

The prize for Google: the potential to broker ads on
the mobile phones, complementing the huge ad business it has built
online. Google even envisions a phone service one day that is free of
monthly subscription charges and supported entirely through ad revenue,
people familiar with the matter say.

Last year, global spending on mobile-phone
advertising, including placement of ads in text messages, Web pages,
video and all other content, was only $1.5 billion, according to
eMarketer. But that figure is projected to grow to nearly $14 billion
by 2011, the market research firm says.

The proposed Google phone, Apple
Inc.’s iPhone and efforts by other technology companies are aimed at
making Web and computer functions easier for consumers to use on
cellphones. Today, surfing the Web, listening to music and watching
video on cellphones are often clunky experiences.

Unlike Apple, whose cellphone is available exclusively through AT&T,
Google is hoping that multiple operators will offer its phone. And
Google is ready to relinquish some control over design, allowing
manufacturers to create devices based on a common set of specifications.

Google has approached several wireless operators in
the U.S. and Europe in recent months, including AT&T, T-Mobile USA
and Verizon Wireless, a joint venture of Verizon Communications Inc. and Vodafone Group PLC, people familiar with the situation say. T-Mobile USA, a unit of Deutsche Telekom
AG, appears to be the furthest along in considering it, these people
say. Andy Rubin, who helped design T-Mobile’s popular Sidekick phone,
now works at Google and is involved in its handset project.

Google recently struck a deal with Sprint Nextel
Corp. to have a wide array of its services bundled into devices for
that carrier’s high-speed wireless network based on the nascent WiMax
technology. Both companies declined to comment on whether that
relationship would extend to offering Google-customized phones on
Sprint’s existing cellular network.

The specifications Google has laid out for devices
suggest that manufacturers include cameras for photo and video, and
built-in Wi-Fi technology to access the Web at hot spots such as
airports, coffee shops and hotels. It also is recommending that the
phones be designed to work on carriers’ fastest networks, known as 3G,
to ensure that Web pages can be downloaded quickly. Google suggests the
phones could include Global Positioning System technology that
identifies where people are.

People who have seen Google’s prototype devices say they aren’t as revolutionary as the iPhone. One was likened to a slim Nokia
Corp. phone with a keyboard that slides out. Another phone format
presented by Google looked more like a Treo or a BlackBerry. It’s not
clear which manufacturers might build Google wireless devices, though
people familiar with the project say LG Electronics Co. of South Korea
is one company that has held talks with Google. Google has already
lined up a series of hardware component and software partners and
signaled to carriers that it’s open to various degrees of cooperation
on their part, the people say.

Google doesn’t plan to charge a licensing fee to
hardware makers or operators, people familiar with the matter say. The
company has suggested the phones could carry the Google brand alongside
the brand of the operator, or they could be distributed without the
Google name. The Google brand has yet to appear on a significant piece
of consumer hardware.

Some executives at cellphone operators were skeptical about Google’s efforts. They noted the case of Walt Disney Co.’s ESPN, which introduced a sports-centric handset but was forced to shut down the venture last year amid soft demand.

Apple’s iPhone could be a formidable competitor among
consumers — and also present strategic complications. Four of Apple’s
eight directors also serve as directors or advisers to Google. Mr.
Schmidt, the Google CEO, is on Apple’s board. Those with ties to both
companies might find it difficult to avoid conflicts of interest.

Google has generally had better luck in Europe than in
the U.S. in getting its software on cellphones. It has forged a
relationship with the United Kingdom’s Vodafone Group PLC to provide
the search bar on the carrier’s branded Internet homepage, with results
customized for cellphone users. T-Mobile in Europe integrates Google’s
search bar into its welcome screen for users who have a data plan
designed for heavy Web browsing. It’s unclear which carriers in Europe
Google is working with on its handset plans.

–Cassell Bryan-Low, Jane Spencer and Evan Ramstad contributed to this article.

Google Pushes Tailored Phones

Powered by ScribeFire.

The Best Dangerous Science Jobs: Hurricane Hunter, Volcanologist

Stories

WIRED
Erin Biba
Email
07.24.07

1 Astronaut
Since manned spaceflight began in 1961, 24 US astronauts have died in
astro-action — 10 during launch, six during training flights, and
seven on reentry. In 1971, three Soviet cosmonauts suffocated when a
malfunction caused the oxygen to leak out of their ship. Then there’s
that whole riding-an- explosion-into-space thing. And we haven’t even
found aliens yet.

2 Biosafety Level 4 lab researcher
BSL-4 labs handle the deadliest diseases on Earth. In 2004, a Russian
scientist died after accidentally sticking herself with an Ebola-laced
needle. The death occurred only months after a US scientist at the
Army’s BSL-4 lab at Fort Detrick in Maryland made the same mistake…
and survived.

3 Hurricane hunter
The Air Force’s 53rd Weather Reconnaissance Squadron crew members are
the daredevils of meteorology. They fly WC-130s into a hurricane’s
eyewall, 10,000 feet up, to locate the storm’s pressure center and
measure its wind speed. Not surprisingly, some get a little turned
around. Even on the ground, they’re not safe — Hurricane Katrina
destroyed the squad’s home base.

4 Doctors Without Borders mobile lab tech
Testing blood for sleeping sickness — an infectious disease
transmitted by flies that causes brain swelling, heart failure,
insomnia, and an uncontrollable urge to sleep — is dangerous
enough. Now just imagine doing it at an outdoor mobile lab in the
middle of the ongoing genocide in Sudan’s Darfur region.

5 Propulsion engineer
Turns out, the people who ground-test rocket engines don’t actually
worry about explosions. When you work with cryogenic oxygen and gases
pressurized up to 300 psi, you’re far too busy worrying about “cold
burns” and other trauma to really give proper consideration to what
might happen should one of the buggers completely ignite.

6 Grad student
Even the most mundane job in science is hazardous if you don’t know
what you’re doing. Grad students in labs around the world are in
constant danger of, well, screwing up. In 2004, a Texas A&M
student, for example, was cleaning up a laboratory when a jar of
chemicals he was handling suddenly exploded, leaving him with severe
lacerations and burns.

7 Volcanologist
Active volcanoes blow enough ash to bury a city the size of, oh,
Pompeii. No wonder many volcanologists don’t come back from their
helicopter visits to hell. In 1991, three were killed by Japan’s Mount
Unzen. In 2001, one died after falling off a 985-foot-high caldera rim,
and in 2005, four Filipino researchers died in a chopper crash while
inspecting landslide areas.

8 Biologist
Animal research can lead to more than an allergic reaction. Being
bitten, scratched, or exposed to “secretions” can be deadly. For
example, at least 70 percent of captive adult macaque monkeys are
infected with herpes B. In 1997, a 22-year-old researcher died after
contracting the virus from some “biologic” monkey material that got in
her eye.

Illustrations by Thomas Fuchs

Powered by ScribeFire.

The Journamalism of NPR Drives Lance Knobel Shrill!

Stories

He writes:

Davos Newbies » Blog Archive » Way short of “a detailed case”:
NPR usually does a better job than most of reporting accurately and
maintaining the appropriate skepticism about our country’s
leaders but it let me down this morning. While I was shaving, they had
a report on president Bush’s speech yesterday about Iraq as the
front line of the so-called war on terrorism. Mary Louise Kelly said:
“In his speech, the president laid out a detailed case linking
Osama Bin Laden’s terror network to its offshoot in Iraq.”

His case consisted of saying, “Al Qaeda in Iraq is Al Qaeda. In Iraq.”

Powered by ScribeFire.

A Hipper Crowd of Shushers

Stories
July 8, 2007

A Hipper Crowd of Shushers

Correction Appended

ON
a Sunday night last month at Daddy’s, a bar in Williamsburg,
Brooklyn, more than a dozen people in their 20s and 30s gathered at a
professional soiree, drinking frozen margaritas and nibbling
store-bought cookies. With their thrift-store inspired clothes and
abundant tattoos, they looked as if they could be filmmakers, Web
designers, coffee shop purveyors or artists.

When talk turned to a dance party the group had recently given at a nearby restaurant, their profession became clearer.

“Did you try the special drinks?” Sarah Gentile, 29,
asked Jennifer Yao, 31, referring to the colorfully named cocktails.

“I got the Joy of Sex,” Ms. Yao replied. “I thought for sure it was French Women Don’t Get Fat.”

Ms. Yao could be forgiven for being confused: the drink was numbered
and the guests had to guess the name. “613.96 C,” said Ms.
Yao, cryptically, then apologized: “Sorry if I talk in
Dewey.”

That would be the Dewey Decimal System. The groups’ members were librarians. Or, in some cases, guybrarians.

“He hates being called that,” said Sarah Murphy, one of
the evening’s organizers and a founder of the Desk Set, a social
group for librarians and library students.

Ms. Murphy was speaking of Jeff Buckley, a reference librarian at a
law firm, who had a tattoo of the logo from the Federal Depository
Library Program peeking out of his black T-shirt sleeve.

Librarians? Aren’t they supposed to be bespectacled women with
a love of classic books and a perpetual annoyance with talkative
patrons — the ultimate humorless shushers?

Not any more.
 

With so much of the job involving technology and with
a focus now on finding and sharing information beyond just what is
available in books, a new type of librarian is emerging — the
kind that, according to the Web site Librarian Avengers, is
“looking to put the ‘hep cat’ in cataloguing.”

When the cult film “Party Girl” appeared in 1995, with
Parker Posey as a night life impresario who finds happiness in the
stacks, the idea that a librarian could be cool was a joke.

Now, there is a public librarian who writes dispatches for
McSweeney’s Internet Tendency, a favored magazine of the young
literati. “Unshelved,” a comic about librarians —
yes, there is a comic about librarians — features a hipster
librarian character. And, in real life, there are an increasing number
of librarians who are notable not just for their pink-streaked hair but
also for their passion for pop culture, activism and technology.

“We’re not the typical librarians anymore,” said Rick Block, an adjunct professor at the Long Island University
Palmer School and at the Pratt Institute School of Information and
Library Science, both graduate schools for librarians, in New York
City.

“When I was in library school in the early ’80s, the students weren’t as interesting,” Mr. Block said.

Since then, however, library organizations have been trying to
recruit a more diverse group of students and to mentor younger members
of the profession.

“I think we’re getting more progressive and
hipper,” said Carrie Ansell, a 28-year-old law librarian in
Washington.

In the last few years, articles have decried the graying of the
profession, noting a large percentage of librarians that would soon be
retiring and a seemingly insurmountable demand for replacements. But
worries about a mass exodus appear to have been unfounded.

Michele Besant, the librarian at the School of Library and Information Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison,
said the Association of Library and Information Science statistics show
a steady increase in library information science enrollments over the
last 10 years. Further, at hers and other schools there is a trend for
students to be entering masters programs at a younger age.

The myth prevails that librarians are becoming obsolete.
“There’s Google, no one needs us,” Ms. Gentile said,
mockingly, over a drink at Daddy’s.

Still, these are high-tech times. Why are people getting into this
profession when libraries seem as retro as the granny glasses so many
of the members of the Desk Set wear?

“Because it’s cool,” said Ms. Gentile, who works at the Brooklyn Museum.

Ms. Murphy, 29, thinks so, too. An actress who had long considered
library school, Ms. Murphy finally decided to sign up after meeting
several librarians — in bars.

“People I, going in, would never have expected were from the
library field,” she said. “Smart, well-read, interesting,
funny people, who seemed to be happy with their jobs.”

Maria Falgoust, 31, is also a founder of Desk Set, which took its name from the 1957 Katharine Hepburn-Spencer
Tracy romantic comedy. A student who works part time at the library at
Saint Ann’s School, she was inspired to become a librarian by a
friend, a public librarian who works with teenagers and goes to rock
shows regularly.

Since matriculating to Palmer, Ms. Falgoust has met plenty of other
like-minded librarians at places such as Brooklyn Label, a restaurant,
and at Punk Rope, an exercise class. “They’re everywhere
you go,” she said.

Especially in Greenpoint, where Ms. Murphy and Ms. Falgoust live
about 10 blocks from each other and where there are, Ms. Falgoust said,
about 13 other librarians in the neighborhood.

How did such a nerdy profession become cool — aside from the
fact that a certain amount of nerdiness is now cool? Many young
librarians and library professors said that the work is no longer just
about books but also about organizing and connecting people with
information, including music and movies.

And though many librarians say that they, like nurses or priests,
are called to the profession, they also say the job is stable,
intellectually stimulating and can have reasonable hours —
perfect for creative types who want to pursue their passions outside of
work and don’t want to finance their pursuits by waiting tables.
(The median salary for librarians was about $51,000 in 2006, according
to the American Library Association-Allied Professional Organization.)

“I wanted to do something different, something maybe more
meaningful,” said Carrie Klein, 36, who used to be a publicist
for a record label and for bands such as Radiohead and the Foo
Fighters, but is now starting a new job in the library at Entertainment
Weekly.

Michelle Campbell, 26, a librarian in Washington, said that
librarianship is a haven for left-wing social engagement, which is
particularly appealing to the young librarians she knows.
“Especially those of us who graduated around the same time as the
Patriot Act,” Ms. Campbell said. “We see what happens when
information is restricted.”

Ms. Campbell added that she became a librarian because it
“combined a geeky intellectualism” with information
technology skills and social activism.

Jessamyn West, 38, an editor of “Revolting Librarians Redux:
Radical Librarians Speak Out” a book that promotes social
responsibility in librarianship, and the librarian behind the Web site librarian.net
(its tagline is “putting the rarin’ back in librarian since
1999”) agreed that many new librarians are attracted to what they
call the “Library 2.0” phenomenon. “It’s become
a techie profession,” she said.

In a typical day, Ms. West might send instant and e-mail messages to
patrons, many of who do their research online rather than in the
library. She might also check Twitter, MySpace
and other social networking sites, post to her various blogs and keep
current through MetaFilter and RSS feeds. Some librarians also create
Wikis or podcasts.

At the American Library Association’s annual conference last
month in Washington, there were display tables of graphic novels, manga
and comic books. In addition to a panel called “No Shushing
Required,” there were sessions on social networking and zines and
one called “Future Friends: Marketing Reference and User Services
to Generation X.”

On a Saturday, after a day of panels, a group of librarians relaxed
and danced at Selam Restaurant. Sarah Mercure nursed a blueberry vodka
and cranberry juice and talked about deciding on her career after
hearing a librarian who curated a zine collection speak. Pete Welsch, a
D.J., spun records and talked about how his interest in social
activism, film and music led him to library school.

But some librarians have found the job can be at odds with their outside cultural interests.

“I went to see a band a few weeks ago with old co-workers and
turned to one and said ‘Is it just me or is this really, really
loud?’ ” said Ms. Klein, the former publicist. Her friend,
she said, “laughed and said, ‘You have librarian ears
now.’ ”

Correction: July 15, 2007

An article last Sunday about a younger generation of librarians misstated the name of a library organization that held a conference in Washington last month. It is the American Library Association, not the American Librarian Association.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Democrats are "PR spokespeople for Al Qaeda"

Stories

Media Matters – Limbaugh:

Limbaugh: Democrats are “PR spokespeople for Al Qaeda”

On the July 31 broadcast of his nationally syndicated radio
show, Rush Limbaugh
claimed that Democrats have “aligned themselves with the enemy” in Iraq and went on to assert: “The enemy
kills more soldiers, their spokesmen here in the U.S. are the Democrats. When we
kill more of the enemy, the Democrats are silent and they say nothing.”
He continued: “But when we have reports of, you know, another IED, or
pictures of a car on fire — then the Democrats assume the role of media PR
spokespeople for Al Qaeda.”

From the July 31
broadcast of Premiere
Radio Networks’ The Rush Limbaugh Show:

LIMBAUGH: I mean,
there’s almost a mathematical formula to this that I have detected. To
the extent that we make progress, the Democrats’ political hopes are
diminished. Now, what kind of political leaders position themselves that way so
that they only win when their country loses? And what kind of brains do they
have to position themselves in such a way so that when we make progress, their
political aspirations are diminished?

They’re the ones that created
this situation. They have aligned themselves
with the enemy. They continue to align themselves with the enemy. They
won’t admit it, obviously. The enemy kills more soldiers, their spokesmen
here in the U.S.
are the Democrats. When we kill more of the enemy, the Democrats are silent and
they say nothing. But when we have
reports of, you know, another IED, or pictures of a car on fire — then the
Democrats assume the role of media PR spokespeople for Al Qaeda.

—A.J.W.

Powered by ScribeFire.

In Praise of Tap Water

Stories

In Praise of Tap Water

On the streets of New York or Denver or
San Mateo this summer, it seems the telltale cap of a water bottle is
sticking out of every other satchel. Americans are increasingly thirsty
for what is billed as the healthiest, and often most expensive, water
on the grocery shelf. But this country has some of the best public
water supplies in the world. Instead of consuming four billion gallons
of water a year in individual-sized bottles, we need to start thinking
about what all those bottles are doing to the planet’s health.

Here are the hard, dry facts: Yes, drinking water is a good thing, far
better than buying soft drinks, or liquid candy, as nutritionists like
to call it. And almost all municipal water in America is so good that
nobody needs to import a single bottle from Italy or France or the Fiji
Islands. Meanwhile, if you choose to get your recommended eight glasses
a day from bottled water, you could spend up to $1,400 annually. The
same amount of tap water would cost about 49 cents.

Next,
there’s the environment. Water bottles, like other containers,
are made from natural gas and petroleum. The Earth Policy Institute in
Washington has estimated that it takes about 1.5 million barrels of oil
to make the water bottles Americans use each year. That could fuel
100,000 cars a year instead. And, only about 23 percent of those
bottles are recycled, in part because water bottles are often not
included in local redemption plans that accept beer and soda cans. Add
in the substantial amount of fuel used in transporting water, which is
extremely heavy, and the impact on the environment is anything but
refreshing.

Tap water may now be the equal of bottled water,
but that could change. The more the wealthy opt out of drinking tap
water, the less political support there will be for investing in
maintaining America’s public water supply. That would be a
serious loss. Access to cheap, clean water is basic to the
nation’s health.

Some local governments have begun to
fight back. Earlier this summer, San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom
prohibited his city’s departments and agencies from buying
bottled water, noting that San Francisco water is “some of the
most pristine on the planet.” Salt Lake City has issued a similar
decree, and New York City recently began an advertising campaign that
touted its water as “clean,” “zero sugar” and
even “stain free.”

The real change, though, will come
when millions of ordinary consumers realize that they can save money,
and save the planet, by turning in their water bottles and turning on
the tap.

In Praise of Tap Water – New York Times

Senate to Hold Hearing on Security of Voting Machines

Stories

Senate to Hold Hearing on Security of Voting Machines

By Kim Zetter

Electronicvoting2
In the wake of the California report
released last week showing that Red Team security researchers were able
to hack voting machines from three of the top voting machine companies,
Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-California) announced today that the Senate
Rules and Administration Committee will hold a hearing in September to
examine the report’s findings. From the press release:

“I was very surprised to read how easily these machines could be
hacked into and election results distorted,” Senator Feinstein
said. “This report demonstrates the precarious risk of relying on
electronic voting machines, especially when a verified paper record is
not provided. These findings are yet another reason that states and
counties should consider a move to optical scan machines that provide
an auditable, individual voter-verified paper record without having to
rely on a separate printer.”

One wonders where the senator has been the last four years
that she’s surprised by the findings revealed in the report. Feinstein
introduced a bill earlier this year that would require voting machines
nationwide to produce a paper trail, but the bill has received little
support in the Senate thus far.

Another bill that Congressman Rush Holt (D-New Jersey) introduced in
the House years ago (and reintroduced this year) is making better
progress, though its path has hardly been smooth. As I reported two weeks ago,
the bill almost died due to arguments among interest groups over
sections of the bill dealing with the paper trail mandate and voter
accessibility. A compromise was apparently reached this week (see the draft version
that’s been circulating on the internet), but voting activists are
steaming mad with it since it would allow touch-screen machines with
add-on printers to continue to be used. The machines use thermal paper,
such as the kind used in cash registers.

Voting activist groups fought hard to get those printers in place in 2003 and 2004 and were the impetus
for the original Holt bill back in 2003 which would have mandated that
printers be installed on all touch-screen machines. But the activists
have since changed their minds and now want touch-screen machines
outlawed entirely and replaced with optical-scan machines that use a
durable full-size paper ballot. The revised bill introduced this year
initially seemed to suggest that touch-screen machines would be
outlawed, but that wording in the bill has since changed to permit
counties to use the touch-screen machines with printers.

Powered by ScribeFire.