The Blogs Are Alive With the Sound of Angry Democrats

Stories


New York Times

The Blogs Are Alive With the Sound of Angry Democrats

WASHINGTON, Aug. 8 —
Progressive and liberal groups and left-leaning blogs are furious,
tossing around fighting words like “spineless,”
“craven” and “weak.”

So much for the hopes of Democratic leaders that they could avoid a
withering political attack by clearing the way for Congress to approve
an expansion of the Bush administration’s terrorist surveillance
program before the August recess.

“Democratic leaders in Congress didn’t put up much of a
fight and they didn’t stand up and say ‘no’ to
Bush,” said an e-mail message that political operatives for the
group MoveOn
sent Tuesday to the organization’s members, urging them to sign
an online petition calling on Congress to reverse the new law.

Activist groups were somewhat forgiving earlier this year when
Democrats backed down in a fight with President Bush over war spending,
but the concession on changes to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance
Act seems to have touched a nerve.

From the perspective of liberal critics, Democrats again let
themselves be hoodwinked into handing Mr. Bush substantial new power on
the basis of White House warnings of an imminent threat. And they did
so when Mr. Bush’s poll numbers are low.

“Ultimately, it was the Democratic leadership on the Hill that
rolled over to this demand,” said Caroline Fredrickson, a top
lobbyist for the American Civil Liberties Union.
“Instead of standing strong and standing on principle, they
panicked and gave the administration not only what it has been asking
for, but more.”

Democratic officials in the House and the Senate say they understand
the dismay that greeted the measure’s passage and point out that
most Democrats opposed the bill, including the four senators seeking
the party’s presidential nomination. But they say that given
classified security briefings and the approach of the recess, Democrats
had little choice.

“Everyone who heard the briefings from the administration
agreed that the intelligence community did not have what it
needed,” said Jim Manley, a spokesman for Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the majority leader. “Both Democrats and Republicans alike agreed that going home without addressing this issue was not an option.”

And once the Senate left town after approving the Republican
proposal making it possible to institute wiretaps without warrants,
House members found themselves in the position of either acting or
being the last roadblock to the changes sought by the White House.

“We agreed with the administration that there was a problem
with FISA that needed to be fixed,” said Brendan Daly, a
spokesman for Speaker Nancy Pelosi
of California. “We thought we had a bill that protected civil
liberties and addressed their problems, but it did not have the votes
on its own.”

Still, many House Democrats argued Saturday both in private party
meetings and again on the floor that Democrats should either prevent a
vote on the Republican proposal or join together to defeat it no matter
the political cost. They believed the measure went too far in handing
surveillance power to the administration, particularly Attorney General
Alberto R. Gonzales, without sufficient judicial review.

“We should have stood our ground,” said Representative Jerrold Nadler,
Democrat of New York. “We had a bill that did everything they
said was necessary for national security. I think we could defend
that.”

Progressive bloggers agreed. “Cowards,” said the
headline on a post Tuesday on the Daily Kos Web site, which listed the
41 House Democrats and 16 Senate Democrats who sided with the White
House and Republicans.

As they dealt with the political fallout, Democrats noted that
Congressional aides were already drafting a revision of the bill, which
expires in six months. But they also acknowledged that reaching
agreement on changes would not be easy.

The A.C.L.U. wants to make sure that Congress and the country have
all the information they need for the renewed debate. On Wednesday, the
group filed an unusual request with the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Court, which operates in near-total secrecy, asking it to
make public its recent opinions on the scope of the government’s
ability to wiretap Americans.

The executive director of the A.C.L.U., Anthony D. Romero, said,
“Unless the FISA court discloses the documents leading up to the
recent law and shedding light on the government’s claimed
surveillance authority, an informed and meaningful debate — the
cornerstone of our democracy — cannot occur.”

Democrats and political analysts said they expected the long-term
political consequences of last week’s votes to be minimal because
most of those who are irate would not be inclined to back Republicans.

“At the end of the day, how many choices do they have?”
asked Stuart Rothenberg, a nonpartisan political analyst, about liberal
voters. “How many Democratic primaries are going to be determined
by this? Base voters have a way of complaining, being angry, of holding
their breath until they turn blue. But I don’t see it as having
any real consequence.”

Others say frustration with the party over issues like the
surveillance vote is at the heart of the dismal poll ratings for
Congress.

Some are already talking about primary challenges for Democrats whom
they consider enablers of Mr. Bush, like moderate Blue Dogs who formed
the core of Democratic support for the eavesdropping proposal in the
House. On the Web site Open Left, the blogger Matt Stoller accused the
Blue Dogs of one of their “standard betrayals.”

“The upside,” Mr. Stoller wrote, “is that
organizing is beginning already around fixing the FISA legislation, and
a campaign to destroy the brand of the Blue Dogs is not far
away.”

Eric Lichtblau contributed reporting.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Pakistani TVs say Musharraf to declare emergency

Stories

Pakistani TVs say Musharraf to declare emergency

Wed Aug 8, 2007 4:08PM EDT

By Zeeshan Haider

ISLAMABAD (Reuters) – Private Pakistani television channels reported
on Wednesday that President Pervez Musharraf was preparing to declare a
state of emergency imminently, but government spokesmen denied there
were any such plans.

State-run Pakistan Television quoted official sources as saying the
reports were baseless and Information Minister Mohammad Ali Durrani
denied to Reuters that a meeting had been held to discuss the
imposition of an emergency, as rumors swept the country.

A member of the inner circle of the Pakistani leadership told
Reuters, however, that U.S. ally Musharraf was considering the option,
which could allow him to extend the tenure of the national and
provincial assemblies by 12 months and delay elections due by the turn
of the year.

The government could explain such a step by citing growing
insecurity because of the threat posed by Islamist militants allied to
the Taliban and al Qaeda after a series of attacks, many of them by
suicide bombers, in the past month.

Political analysts and opposition leaders, however, have feared that
Musharraf, who is going through his weakest period since coming to
power in a 1999 coup, might resort to an emergency because of
difficulties he faces in getting re-elected by the sitting assemblies,
while still army chief.

“Both internal and external threats are such that you cannot rule
out anything. At the moment there is no emergency. We have said that
options are available with the government,” Deputy Information Minister
Tariq Azim Khan told Geo TV, one of the channels reporting that the
measure would be announced soon.

The United States has put Musharraf under pressure to act against al
Qaeda nests in hostile tribal regions on the Afghan border, such as
North Waziristan.

Western countries with troops in Afghanistan are sensitive to any
instability in nuclear-armed Pakistan, whose help is crucial to
fighting the Taliban insurgency and in counter-terrorism operations
against al Qaeda.

SHORT OF SUPPORT

A not-so-secret meeting in Abu Dhabi in late July with former Prime
Minister Benazir Bhutto, leader of the largest opposition party, to try
to agree terms for power sharing was indicative of how desperate
Musharraf’s position had become.

Musharraf wants to be re-elected in uniform between mid-September
and mid-October before national and provincial assemblies are dissolved
for parliamentary elections due in December or January.

Although Musharraf can command the simple majority needed to win
re-election in the assemblies, he is likely to face multiple
constitutional challenges.

The Supreme Court’s decision on July 20 to reinstate a chief justice
Musharraf had spent four months trying to sack heightened expectations
that those challenges could well be upheld.

Musharraf would need a two-thirds majority in the National Assembly
to change the constitution, and avoid challenges in the Supreme Court,
but for that he would need Bhutto’s help.

She wants Musharraf to quit the army and guarantee free and fair elections before she will countenance any deal.

© Reuters 2006.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Tow-truck Driver From New York City Steam Blast in Medically Induced Coma

Stories

A tow-truck driver and his
passenger burned when a massive steam-pipe explosion blew a crater in a
Manhattan street last month have sued the city’s utility provider,
accusing it of misconduct.

Passenger Judith Bailey and a guardian for driver Gregory
McCullough seek unspecified damages from Consolidated Edison in the
lawsuits filed Tuesday in State Supreme Court.

The victims accused Con Edison of failing to “properly operate and
maintain its steam system,” thereby creating a “ticking time bomb.”
More than 12 such pipes have exploded since 1987, including one that
killed three people in 1989 and released 200 pounds of asbestos into
the air, the plaintiffs claim.

The lawsuits came the same day the utility said a shoddy repair job
on one of the pipes didn’t cause the explosion. Inspections suggested
the explosion was spontaneous, utility officials said.

About 40 people were injured and one woman died of a heart attack as a result of the blast.

McCullough, 21, and Bailey, 30, were in the truck when the pipe
burst near Grand Central Terminal on July 18, causing the ground below
them to give way and create a massive sinkhole. McCullough was taking
Bailey home after towing her car to a repair shop.

The truck was sucked into the crater and engulfed in a blanket of
scorching steam, mud and asbestos that soared stories into the air,
sending people fleeing and rattling the city.

McCullough has been placed in a medically induced coma to control
his pain and has undergone surgery to remove dead skin. He suffered
third-degree burns to more than 80 percent of his body.

Bailey, a single mother with two daughters, suffered burns to more
than 30 percent of her body. She was to be released from the hospital
Wednesday afternoon, her lawyer said.

Con Edison spokesman Chris Olert said the utility does not comment on pending litigation.

Con Edison has hired an engineering firm specializing in analyzing
structure failures to investigate the blast. The work is expected to
take at least three months. State utility regulators are conducting a
separate investigation.

(AP)

Powered by ScribeFire.

Rain Cripples New York City Transit

Stories

By VERENA DOBNIK and DAVID CARUSO

NEW YORK –

A torrential downpour sent water surging through New York’s subway system
and highway tunnels and across airport runways Wednesday, leaving
thousands of commuters stranded and one big question: How could 3
inches of rain bring the nation’s largest mass transit system to a halt.

 

The
storm, which also spawned a rare tornado, hit just before dawn. By rush
hour, the subway system was virtually paralyzed when pumping stations
became overwhelmed. Bedlam resulted from too much rain, too fast; some
suburban commuters spent a half day just getting to work.

 

“One
big rain and it all falls apart,” said Ruby Russell, 64, as she sat
waiting on a train in Brooklyn. She had been trying to get to Manhattan
for three hours.

 

The failure renewed a debate about whether the
network of pumps, sewers and drains that protects the city’s subways
from flooding needs an overhaul. Every line experienced some sort of
delay as track beds turned into streams gurgling with millions of
gallons of rainwater. The washout was the third time in seven months
that the subways were disrupted by rain.

 

Metropolitan Transit
Authority engineers were asked to report back to Gov. Eliot Spitzer
within 30 days with suggestions about how to deal with the chronic
flooding.

 

“We have a design issue that we need to think about,” Spitzer said.

 

The
National Weather Service said a tropical air mass dumped an
extraordinary amount of rain in a short period of time. The worst was
recorded between 5 a.m. and 8 a.m., with 2.5 inches falling on Central
Park and almost 3.5 on Kennedy International Airport.

 

Naturally,
the stormwater sought the low ground, and that meant the subways. Water
poured in through vents, drowned the signal system and flooded the
third rail, forcing a shutoff of power on some lines.

 

MTA
Executive Director Elliot G. Sander said the intensity of the rain was
simply overwhelming. The subway’s drainage system can generally handle
a maximum of 1.5 inches of rainfall per hour.

 

“The timing and intensity of the storm took us by surprise,” Sander said.

 

The
subway problems come as weather experts predict New York is due for a
major hurricane. A storm with 130 mph winds and a 30-foot storm surge
could cause the Hudson and East rivers to overflow – and bring with it
more significant flooding than a severe rainstorm.

 

Keeping the subway system dry is a challenge, even in regular weather.

 

On
an average day, hundreds of MTA pumps remove 13 million gallons of
water from the system, which includes several tunnels and stations
below sea level. Much of that water is groundwater that enters from
sources such as streams.

 

Public officials called for improvements
in the drainage system after a similar rain-related shutdown in 1999,
and the MTA made some changes after another round of paralyzing tunnel
floods in 2004, when the remnants of Hurricane Frances washed out the
subways for hours.

 

The city’s sewer and stormwater drains can
handle steady rain, “but when it comes to these very intense, high
inch-count rain events, over a short period of time, it is very
difficult,” said Michael Saucier, a spokesman for the city’s Department
of Environmental Protection.

 

DEP Commissioner Emily Lloyd said
the city is spending $300 million per year upgrading its piping systems
and has been gradually building a more robust stormwater drainage
system to replace the old combined sewers that handled wastewater and
rain.

 

In Manhattan, Times Square was one huge mess Wednesday,
packed with many of the 4 million riders who rely on the subway system
daily. Thousands waited for hours for any means of transportation,
jostling one another to get on the few buses that arrived. The suburbs
were no better: In Westchester County, hundreds of commuters were
stopped on a Metro-North train due to track flooding.

 

Streams of
people in business attire – with briefcases, cell phones and
BlackBerries in hand – trudged through drenched streets toward the
subway. But it, too, was flooded. The hordes then made a beeline for
buses they’d spotted up the street.

 

The storms also created
problems for the region’s airports, where delays of up to an hour were
reported. The National Weather Service said a tornado touched down in
Brooklyn, where winds downed trees, tore off rooftops and wrapped signs
around posts. At least 40 homes were damaged.

 

Tornadoes have hit
New York City before, but not often. The National Weather Service had
records of at least five, plus sketchy detail on the last reported
tornado sighting in Brooklyn, in 1889. None was as strong as
Wednesday’s twister, which had winds as high as 135 mph.

 

“It’s a once-in-a-lifetime event,” said Jeffrey Tongue, a Weather Service meteorologist.

 

A
woman on Staten Island died when a car got stuck in an underpass and
another car came along and hit hers, Mayor Michael Bloomberg said. A
handful of people were injured, Bloomberg said.

 

Lanie Mastellone,
who lives in Brooklyn’s Bay Ridge neighborhood, awoke as her roof was
coming off. Before escaping, she ran to get her late husband’s wedding
ring.

 

“It happened so quick. Maybe he was watching over me,” Mastellone said.

 

At
the end of the day, some trains were finally back up and running. But
commuters trying to get home were met with another unpleasant surprise:
The storm left behind high humidity that felt like they were walking
into a sauna – and when they got onto train cars, a sardine can.

 

Associated
Press writers Kiley Armstrong, Samantha Gross, Sara Kugler, Colleen
Long, Karen Matthews and Cristian Salazar contributed to this report.

(This version CORRECTS the last name of a commuter to Russell, instead of Russel.)

Copyright 2007 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material
may not be published broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed

Powered by ScribeFire.

When in doubt, blame Washington

Stories

Obama turns to his favorite weapons

When in doubt, blame Washington

August 8, 2007

The debate over who has the best foreign policy judgment continued
Tuesday, with Barack Obama taking punches from Hillary Rodham Clinton,
John Edwards and Chris Dodd.

But Obama, playing an unfamiliar defense game with home field advantage
on a Soldier Field stage, kept returning to two central campaign themes
to inoculate himself against criticism: blaming Washington insiders and
stressing his early objection to the Iraq war. Edwards also raged
against the establishment and gave Obama a run for the anti-Washington
crown.

Nothing very subtle in this 96-minute exchange moderated by MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann.

Clinton hit Obama in the belly over Obama getting trapped
recently in answering a hypothetical question about a nuclear attack on
Pakistan and announcing that he would, if there were actionable
intelligence, send a U.S. strike force into Pakistan to root out
terrorists.

“I do not believe people running for president should engage in
hypotheticals,” she said. Without naming Obama, she said it was a “very
big mistake” to “telegraph” his Pakistan move and “destabilize the
Musharraf regime which is fighting for its life.”

Clinton earned boos for saying what was on her mind about Obama. “You
can think big, but remember you shouldn’t always say everything you
think if you’re running for president, because it has consequences
across the world.”

But she was warmly received as Girlfriend Clinton standing up against
six men. After taking incoming from Obama and Edwards, Clinton slipped
into a serene state. Asked to respond to the attacks, she said calmly,
“I’m just taking it all in” while urging Democrats not to fight each
other. Referring to her years wrangling the “vast right-wing
conspiracy,” Clinton said, “So if you want a winner who knows how to
take them on, I’m your girl.”

And, at a time Obama is trying to establish himself as a foreign policy
heavy, he misspoke when he called the leader of Canada a “president.”
Canada’s leader is a prime minister.

Obama turns to his favorite weapons :: CHICAGO SUN-TIMES :: Lynn Sweet

When in doubt, blame Washington

Powered by ScribeFire.

Obama Struggles to Keep Up

Stories

CHICAGO SUN TIMES

Democratic
rivals accused Hillary Clinton of being too cozy with lobbyists and
Wall Street Tuesday, but the party’s presidential front-runner
portrayed herself as a champion of working people and commonsense
policies, drawing cheers from a crowd of union activists.

Barack
Obama, running second to Clinton in most polls, leveled some of the
criticism but was forced to defend his own recent statements on
Pakistan during the 90-minute debate sponsored by the AFL-CIO at
Chicago’s Soldier Field.

The debate turned into the most
animated encounter of the Democratic campaign, suggesting that the
battle for the party’s nomination may be entering a new phase, one that
is likely to grow increasingly contentious after Labor Day.

The
candidates appeared far more willing to challenge one another directly,
and in more pointed language, than in previous debates.

Elbows
flew throughout the night, and the challengers appeared more eager to
mix it up, stoked perhaps by the enthusiasm of a large and boisterous
audience.

The debate over who has the best foreign policy
judgment continued as the circus came to town, with Barack Obama taking
punches from Hillary Rodham Clinton, John Edwards and Chris Dodd.

But
Obama, playing an unfamiliar defense game with home field advantage on
a Soldier Field stage, kept returning to two central campaign themes to
inoculate himself against criticism:

Blaming Washington insiders and stressing his early objection to the Iraq war.

Edwards also raged against the establishment and gave Obama a run for the anti-Washington crown.

Nothing very subtle in this 96-minute exchange moderated by MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann.

Clinton
hit Obama in the belly over Obama getting trapped recently in answering
a hypothetical question about a nuclear attack on Pakistan and
announcing that he would, if there were actionable intelligence, send a
U.S. strike force into Pakistan to root out terrorists.

“I do not believe people running for president should engage in hypotheticals,” she said.

Without
naming Obama, she said it was a “very big mistake” to “telegraph” his
Pakistan move and “destabilize the Musharraf regime which is fighting
for its life.”

Clinton earned boos for saying what was on her
mind about Obama. “You can think big, but remember you shouldn’t always
say everything you think if you’re running for president, because it
has consequences across the world.”

But she was warmly received
as Girlfriend Clinton standing up against six men. After taking
incoming from Obama and Edwards, Clinton slipped into a serene state.

Asked to respond to the attacks, she said calmly, “I’m just taking it all in” while urging Democrats not to fight each other.

Referring
to her years wrangling the “vast right-wing conspiracy,” Clinton said,
“So if you want a winner who knows how to take them on, I’m your girl.”

And,
at a time Obama is trying to establish himself as a foreign policy
heavy, he misspoke when he called the leader of Canada a “president.”
Canada’s leader is a prime minister.

Jo Swift

Powered by ScribeFire.

Hal Fishman | 1931-2007

Stories

Hal Fishman

In 1999, KTLA’s 10
p.m. news team included, from left, sportscaster Tony Hernandez,
Fishman, co-anchor Terry Anzur and weatherman Roland Galvan.
(KTLA)

Hal Fishman
Hal Fishman | 1931-2007

Powered by ScribeFire.

War Is a Moneymaker

Stories

War Is a Moneymaker

It
should be clear to America, by this point in the “war
president’s” reign, that American foreign policy has always
been to create its own enemies.

Like all of Bush’s
predecessors, his “mistakes” in foreign policy have usually
strengthened those we are fighting, or those whom we are about to
fight.

The enormous arms packages that Bush has proposed for
Israel and every Sunni state in the Middle East region (except for
Shiite Iran) are meant to be used in a planned regional expansion of
the war in Iraq.

Congress has basically authorized a massive
expansion of the war that the People want to be terminated, with the
recent votes against Iran that read like the Iraq war resolution.

The
creation of covert forces to be used inside of Iran and the torrent of
weaponry that is now flowing to the Sinoura government in Lebanon are
leading elements of the strategy to make war against Iran and all of
its allies, even those in Iraq.

Jo Swift

Powered by ScribeFire.

Nixon Resigns

Stories

Nixon Resigns

He Urges a Time of ‘Healing’; Ford Will Take Office Today The 37th President Is First to Quit Post

By JOHN HERBERS
Special to THE NEW YORK TIMES
Washington, Aug. 8 — Richard Milhous Nixon, the 37th President of the United States, announced tonight that he had given up his long and arduous fight to remain in office and would resign, effective at noon tomorrow.

At that hour, Gerald Rudolph Ford, whom Mr. Nixon nominated for Vice President last Oct. 12, will be sworn in as the 38th President, to serve out the 895 days remaining in Mr. Nixon’s second term.

Less than two years after his landslide re-election victory, Mr. Nixon, in a conciliatory address on national television, said that he was leaving not with a sense of bitterness but with a hope that his departure would start a “process of healing that is so desperately needed in America.”

He spoke of regret for any “injuries” done “in the course of the events that led to this decision.” He acknowledged that some of his judgments had been wrong.

The 61-year old Mr. Nixon, appearing calm and resigned to his fate as a victim of the Watergate scandal, became the first President in the history of the Republic to resign from office. Only 10 months earlier Spiro Agnew resigned the Vice-Presidency.

Speaks of Pain at Yielding Post

Mr. Nixon, speaking from the Oval Office, where his successor will be sworn in tomorrow, may well have delivered his most effective speech since the Watergate scandals began to swamp his Administration in early 1973.

In tone and content, the 15-minute address was in sharp contrast to his frequently combative language of the past, especially his first “farewell” appearance- that of 1962, when he announced he was retiring from politics after losing the California governorship race and declared that the news media would not have “Nixon to kick around” anymore.

Yet he spoke tonight of how painful it was for him to give up the office.

“I would have preferred to carry through to the finish whatever the personal agony it would have involved, and my family unanimously urged me to do so,” he said.

Puts ‘Interests of America First’

“I have never been a quitter,” he said. “To leave office before my term is completed is opposed to every instinct in my body.” But he said that he had decided to put “the interests of America first.”

Conceding that he did not have the votes in Congress to escape impeachment in the House and conviction in the Senate, Mr. Nixon said, “To continue to fight through the months ahead for my personal vindication would almost totally absorb the time and attention of the President and the Congress in a period when our entire focus should be on the great issues of peace abroad and prosperity without inflation at home.”

“Therefore,” he continued, “I shall resign the Presidency effective at noon tomorrow. Vice President Ford will be sworn in as President at that hour in this office.”

Then he turned again to his sorrow at leaving. Although he did not mention it in his speech, Mr. Nixon had looked forward to being President when the United States celebrates its 200th anniversary in 1976.

“I feel a great sadness,” he said.

Mr. Nixon expressed confidence in Mr. Ford to assume the office, “to put the bitterness and divisions of the recent past behind us.”

“By taking this action, I hope that I will have hastened the start of that process of healing which is so desperately needed in America,” he said. “I regret deeply any injuries that may have been done in the course of the events that led to this decision. I would say only that events that if some of my judgments were wrong — and some were wrong — they were made in what I believed at the time to be the best interests of the nation.”

Further, he said he was leaving “with no bitterness” toward those who had opposed him.

“So let us all now join together in affirming that common commitment and in helping our new President succeed for the benefit of all Americans,” he said.

As he has many times in the past, Mr. Nixon listed what he considered his most notable accomplishments of his five and half years in office — his initiatives in foreign policy, which he said had gone a long way toward establishing a basis for world peace.

Theodore Roosevelt Is Quoted

And, at the end, he expressed his own philosophy — that to succeed is to be involved in struggle. In this he quoted Theodore Roosevelt about the value of being “the man in the arena whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood” and who “spends himself in a worthy cause.”

After spending himself in a long political career, Mr. Nixon is scheduled to fly to his home in San Clemente, Calif., and retirement tomorrow while Mr. Ford is being sworn in the Oval Office.

A White House spokesman said tonight that Mr. and Mrs. Nixon and their family would bid farewell to Cabinet members and staff personnel at 9:30 A. M. tomorrow in the East Room. Then they will board a helicopter at 10 A. M. for the short trip to Andrews Air Force Base, where they will emplane on the Spirit of ’76, a jet aircraft, for their flight to San Clemente.

Ronald L. Ziegler, the Presidential adviser and press secretary, also said that Mr. Nixon’s letter of resignation would be delivered to the office of Secretary of State, Kissinger in the Executive Office Building adjacent to the White House by noon tomorrow.

Mr. Nixon’s announcement came only two days after he told his Cabinet that he would not resign but would let the constitutional impeachment process run its course, even though it was evident he would be removed from office after a trial by the Senate.

In the next 48 hours the pressures for him to resign and turn the reins of the Government over to Mr. Ford became overwhelming.

His chances of being acquitted were almost hopeless. Senator Barry, Goldwater, the Arizona conservative who was the Republican Presidential candidate in 1964, told him that he had no more than 15 votes in the Senate, far short of the 34 he needed to be sure of escaping conviction. Members of his own staff, including Gen. Alexander M. Haig Jr., the White House chief of staff, strongly recommended that he step down in the national interest.

In the end only a small minority of his former supporters were urging him to stay and pledging to give him their support. It was his friends, not his legions of enemies, that brought the crucial pressures for resignation.

Seventeen months of almost constant disclosures of Watergate and related scandals brought a steady attrition of support, in the country and in Congress, for what many authorities believed was the most powerful Presidency in the history of our nation.

However, a Presidential statement of last Monday and three transcripts of Presidential conversations that Mr. Nixon chose to make public ultimately precipitated the crush of events of the last week.

In that statement, Mr. Nixon admitted, as the transcript showed, that, on June 23, 1972, he ordered a halt to the investigation of the break-in at the Democratic headquarters in the Watergate complex here six days earlier by persons in the employ of agents of Mr. Nixon’s re-election campaign. He also admitted that he had kept the evidence from both his attorneys and the House Judiciary Committee, which had recommended that the House impeach him on three general charges.

Then came the avalanche. Republicans, Southern Democrats and others who had defended Mr. Nixon said that these actions constituted the evidence needed to support the article of impeachment approved by the House Judiciary Committee charging obstruction of justice. And it gave new support to other charges that Mr. Nixon had widely abused his office by bringing undue Presidential pressures to bear on sensitive Government agencies.

As the pressures mounted and Mr. Nixon held publicly to his resolve not to resign, the capital was thrown into a turmoil. A number of Senators anxious for a resignation began publicly predicting one.

At the White House yesterday, Mr. Nixon met in his White House offices with Mrs. Nixon and his two daughters, Mrs. David Eisenhower and Mrs. Edward F. Cox, and with his close aides. Members of his staff, acting independently of the Congressmen, sent him memorandums he had requested as to their recommendations. Most called for resignation rather than taking the country through a painful impeachment debate and vote in the House and a trial in the Senate.

Last night, Raymond K. Price and other speech writers were ordered to prepare a resignation statement for use tonight. Secretary of State Kissinger met with the President late in the evening and Mr. Nixon told him that he would resign in the national interest.

At 11 A.M. today, as crowds for the third day gathered along Pennsylvania Avenue outside the White House, President Nixon summoned Mr. Ford to his Oval Office and officially informed him that he would submit his resignation tomorrow to the Secretary of State, as provided by Federal law, and that Mr. Ford would become President.

Shortly after noon, Mr. Ziegler, the President’s confidant and press secretary, his face saddened and weary, appeared in the crowded White House press room and announced that the President would go on national radio and television tonight to address the American people. As with most previous such announcements, he did not say what the President would talk about.

But by that time, other Presidential aides were confirming that Mr. Nixon planned to resign, and the tensions that had been building for days subsided.

At 7:30 P.M. Mr. Nixon met in his office in the Executive Office Building with a bipartisan Congressional leadership group — James O. Eastland, Democrat of Mississippi, President pro tem of the Senate; Mike Mansfield, Democrat of Montana, the Senate majority leader, Hugh Scott, Republican of Pennsylvania, the Senate minority floor leader, Carl Albert, Democrat of Oklahoma, the Speaker of the House, and John J. Rhodes, Republican of Arizona, the minority leader. The meeting was to give them formal notice of his resignation.

Among the White House staff today there was a sadness but there were no tears, according to those there. Mr. Nixon, who was described as wretched and gray yesterday while wrestling with his decision, was described today as relaxed. To some, he appeared relieved.

He ordered Mr. Price to begin drafting the resignation speech yesterday, even before he made his decision to resign, aides said. Five drafts of it were written before it was turned over to Mr. Nixon to make his own changes.

It was exactly six years ago last night that Mr. Nixon was nominated on the first ballot at the Republican National Convention to be the party’s nominee for President, a note of irony that did not escape members of the President’s staff.

That evening marked the beginning of an ascension to power that was to put the Nixon mark on an important segment of history. After a first term marked by innovations in foreign policy and a return of resources to the state and local governments in domestic policy, Mr. Nixon in 1972, won re-election with 60.7 per cent of the vote.

In early 1973, as he ended American military involvement in the Vietnam war and as he moved to strengthen the powers of his office in a multitude of ways, his popularity rating in the Gallup Poll registered 68 per cent. But as the Watergate disclosures broke his rating dropped quickly and was below 30 per cent before the end of the year.

Mr. Nixon made a number of counterattacks to win back his lost popularity. He campaigned from time to time across the country as if he was running for office. He disclosed information about his taxes and property. He hired a succession of lawyers to defend him in the courts and in Congress.

He made television and radio appearances. He ordered his subordinates to step up their activities to show that the Government’s business was moving ahead. He made foreign trips to show he was still a world leader.

Cheered in Tour of Middle East

In the Middle East in June he was cheered by vast throngs, and he held a summit meeting with Soviet leader, Leonid I. Brezhnev, in Moscow.

Yet, when he returned to the United States, the Gallup Poll showed his rating at 24 per cent and the Watergate charges broke anew as the House Judiciary Committee stepped up its impeachment inquiry. His Administration was tottering when he made his remarkable statement last Monday, apparently in an effort to put his own interpretation on information that was expected to have been made public at the Watergate trials as a result of a Supreme Court decision upholding a court order for the information.

When the decision to resign came, Mr. Nixon moved to achieve an orderly transition of power to Mr. Ford. General Haig, who has had broad delegated authority in recent months, met frequently with the Vice President to brief him on policy, as did other Administration officials.

Mr. Kissinger gave a number of assurances that the nation’s “bipartisan foreign policy” would remain firmly in place. The Defense Department announced that American military forces around the world would continue under normal status. And across this city thousands of Federal employees performed their chores as if nothing was happening.

Powered by ScribeFire.