Tom Friedman's Flexible Deadlines

Stories

Tom Friedman’s Flexible Deadlines
Iraq’s ‘decisive’ six months have lasted two and a half years

5/16/06


New York Times
foreign affairs columnist Tom Friedman is considered by many of his
media colleagues to be one of the wisest observers of international
affairs. “You have a global brain, my friend,” MSNBC host Chris Matthews once told Friedman (4/21/05). “You’re amazing. You amaze me every time you write a book.”

Such praise is not uncommon. Friedman’s appeal seems to rest on his
ability to discuss complex issues in the simplest possible terms. On a
recent episode of MSNBC‘s Hardball
(5/11/06), for example, Friedman boiled down the intricacies of the
Iraq situation into a make-or-break deadline: “Well, I think that we’re
going to find out, Chris, in the next year to six months—probably
sooner—whether a decent outcome is possible there, and I think
we’re going to have to just let this play out.”

That confident prediction would seem a lot more insightful, however, if
Friedman hadn’t been making essentially the same forecast almost since
the beginning of the Iraq War. A review of Friedman’s punditry reveals
a long series of similar do-or-die dates that never seem to get any
closer.

“The next six months in Iraq—which will
determine the prospects for democracy-building there—are the most
important six months in U.S. foreign policy in a long, long time.”
(New York Times, 11/30/03)

“What I absolutely don’t understand is just at the moment when we
finally have a UN-approved Iraqi-caretaker government made up
of—I know a lot of these guys—reasonably decent people and
more than reasonably decent people, everyone wants to declare it’s
over. I don’t get it. It might be over in a week, it might be over in a
month, it might be over in six months, but what’s the rush? Can we let
this play out, please?”
(NPR‘s Fresh Air, 6/3/04)

“What we’re gonna find out, Bob, in the next six to nine months is whether we have liberated a country or uncorked a civil war.”
(CBS‘s Face the Nation, 10/3/04)

“Improv time is over. This is crunch time. Iraq will be won or lost in
the next few months. But it won’t be won with high rhetoric. It will be
won on the ground in a war over the last mile.”
(New York Times, 11/28/04)

“I think we’re in the end game now…. I think we’re in a
six-month window here where it’s going to become very clear and this is
all going to pre-empt I think the next congressional
election—that’s my own feeling— let alone the presidential
one.”
(NBC‘s Meet the Press, 9/25/05)

“Maybe the cynical Europeans were right. Maybe this neighborhood is
just beyond transformation. That will become clear in the next few
months as we see just what kind of minority the Sunnis in Iraq intend
to be. If they come around, a decent outcome in Iraq is still possible,
and we should stay to help build it. If they won’t, then we are wasting
our time.”
(New York Times, 9/28/05)

“We’ve teed up this situation for Iraqis, and I think the next six
months really are going to determine whether this country is going to
collapse into three parts or more or whether it’s going to come
together.”
(CBS‘s Face the Nation, 12/18/05)

“We’re at the beginning of I think the decisive I would say six months
in Iraq, OK, because I feel like this election—you know, I felt
from the beginning Iraq was going to be ultimately, Charlie, what
Iraqis make of it.”
(PBS‘s Charlie Rose Show, 12/20/05)

“The only thing I am certain of is that in the wake of this election,
Iraq will be what Iraqis make of it—and the next six months will
tell us a lot. I remain guardedly hopeful.”
(New York Times, 12/21/05)

“I think that we’re going to know after six to nine months whether this
project has any chance of succeeding. In which case, I think the
American people as a whole will want to play it out or whether it
really is a fool’s errand.”
(Oprah Winfrey Show, 1/23/06)

“I think we’re in the end game there, in the next three to six months,
Bob. We’ve got for the first time an Iraqi government elected on the
basis of an Iraqi constitution. Either they’re going to produce the
kind of inclusive consensual government that we aspire to in the near
term, in which case America will stick with it, or they’re not, in
which case I think the bottom’s going to fall out.”
(CBS, 1/31/06)

“I think we are in the end game. The next six to nine months are going
to tell whether we can produce a decent outcome in Iraq.”
(NBC‘s Today, 3/2/06)

“Can Iraqis get this government together? If they do, I think the
American public will continue to want to support the effort there to
try to produce a decent, stable Iraq. But if they don’t, then I think
the bottom is going to fall out of public support here for the whole
Iraq endeavor. So one way or another, I think we’re in the end game in
the sense it’s going to be decided in the next weeks or months whether
there’s an Iraq there worth investing in. And that is something only
Iraqis can tell us.”
(CNN, 4/23/06)

“Well, I think that we’re going to find out, Chris, in the next year to
six months—probably sooner—whether a decent outcome is
possible there, and I think we’re going to have to just let this play
out.”
(MSNBC‘s Hardball, 5/11/06)

*Corrected version 5/17/06

CIA Chief: “We Probably Gave Powell the Wrong Speech”

Stories

drumheller.jpgIn a fascinating interview with Germany’s Der Spiegel magazine, Former European CIA Chief Tyler Drumheller
recounts what it was like working for the CIA during the run up to the
Iraq War and talks — to the extent he can — about how the
administration dealt with the extraordinary renditions we’ve been hearing so much about lately. Drumheller first broke his silence back in April of last year on CBS’ 60 minutes. (h/t Glenn)

Spiegel International:

Drumheller: I had assured my German friends that [“Curveball’s” claims]
wouldn’t be in the speech. I really thought that I had put it to bed. I
had warned the CIA deputy John McLaughlin that this case could be
fabricated. The night before the speech, then CIA director George Tenet
called me at home. I said: “Hey Boss, be careful with that German
report. It’s supposed to be taken out. There are a lot of problems with
that.” He said: “Yeah, yeah. Right. Dont worry about that.”

SPIEGEL: But it turned out to be the centerpiece in Powell’s presentation — and nobody had told him about the doubts.

Drumheller: I turned on the TV in my office, and there it was.
So the first thing I thought, having worked in the government all my
life, was that we probably gave Powell the wrong speech. We checked our files and found out that they had just ignored it.

SPIEGEL: So the White House just ignored the fact that the whole story might have been untrue?

Drumheller: The policy was set. The war in Iraq was coming and they were looking for intelligence to fit into the policy. Read more…

Crooks and Liars

Terry Moran, Michael Gordon and The Mark Halperin Syndrome

Stories

(updated below)

One of the critical issues which that disgraceful Michael Gordon article in yesterday’s New York Times raises
is the extent to which so many national journalists are so eager to
prove to right-wing fanatics that they are sympathetic to their agenda.
Years of being attacked by the Rush Limbaughs and Sean Hannitys and
Bill O’Reillys as being part of the dreaded “liberal media” has created
an obsequious need among many journalists to curry favor — through
reporting which echoes right-wing narratives and/or by attacking the
“liberal bias” of their fellow journalists — all in order to avoid
being criticized by the right-wing noise machine. That is the defining symptom of The Mark Halperin Syndrome.

Glenn Greenwald

DVDACTIVE: "I commend Universal Studios for having the testicular fortitude to release an entire season of Saturday Night Live"

Stories

If you grow as tired of those crappy cast-compilation discs as I do, you’ll welcome with open arms this entire first season of Saturday Night Live.
On the long list of releases I thought would never see the light of
Tuesday, this one ranked pretty high… just beneath anamorphic
editions of the unscrewed-with original Star Wars trilogy.
The argument against this title is staggering. An eight-disc release of
a show thirty-two years old that would require numerous musical
clearances and a likely high production cost? It’s not exactly an
attractive proposition. But now that the unthinkable has been thought
and before me sit twenty-two episodes of SNL, how does it stack up?

Feature

NBC’s Saturday Night (which would become Saturday Night Live
the next season) is a topical and zany sketch comedy show that airs
live on Saturday nights. Each show has a celebrity host who
participates in the sketches as well as a musical guest who performs
between skits. Now in it’s thirty-second season, the show has been
wildly successful, you may have heard of it.

The quality of the show varies with each season, ranging from painfully
unfunny to comedic genius. It’s currently quite painful, but public
opinion on recent seasons has always been diverse. I find that most
agree, however, that the show was best when it was new. Being a child
of the 80s, I wasn’t around when these were first aired, so this marks
my first experience with old-school SNL and I can now verify: the show really was best when it was new.

It takes SNL
a few episodes to settle in with a comfortable blend of zany sketches,
spoof commercials, fake news, movie parodies and musical numbers. The
worst episode in the entire set happens to be the second one, largely
due to Simon and Garfunkel performing eleven mind-numbingly mundane
songs and the cast only cranking out six short sketches. Lucky for us,
the musical guests are given less prominence in later episodes.
Arguably the finest cast ever assembled for SNL,
this first season features the original ‘Not Ready For Prime Time
Players’. This includes Dan Aykroyd, John Belushi, Chevy Chase, Jane
Curtin, Garrett Morris, Gilda Radner and Laraine Newman, each one a
comedic gem. Chase has the most screen-time, opening each episode with
‘Live from New York…’ and hosting Weekend Update. There’s ample
material featuring Aykroyd and Belushi with mostly everyone else
playing second fiddle to these three bad boys of comedy.

For the most part, the sketches are comedy gold. Much of this material
is every bit as relevant and funny today as it was when it first aired,
if not more so. George Carlin’s commentary on airport security measures
and military intelligence (which he believes to be an oxymoron) is
timeless. Similarly, Chase’s ‘Weekend Update’ ribbing of President Ford
feels very familiar, showing that the series hasn’t changed all that
much over the years – only the faces. Like most shows in their first
season, SNL is still a work-in-progress here. The episodes
are more hit than miss, but not every skit is worthwhile and some of
the musical numbers feel painfully dated.

The first season has episodes hosted by George Carlin, Paul Simon, Rob
Reiner, Candice Bergen, Robert Klein, Lily Tomlin, Richard Pryor,
Candice Bergen, Elliot Gould, Buck Henry, Peter Cook & Dudley
Moore, Dick Cavett, Peter Boyle, Desi Arnaz, Jill Clayburgh, Anthony
Perkins, Ron Nessen, Raquel Welch, Madeline Kahn, Dyan Cannon, Buck
Henry, Elliot Gould, Louise Lasser and Kriss Kristofferson,
respectively. Musical guest highlights include Billy Preston, Joe
Cocker (with John Belushi), Howard Shore (yes, that one!), Desi Arnaz and Kriss Kristofferson.

Video

All twenty-two episodes are shown in their original fullscreen aspect
ratio. The presentation is just as rough as you’d expect for something
thirty odd years old and shot for television. The video quality is
often soft and I did spot the occasional tracking line across the
top/bottom of the frame, but honestly, nothing so horrible that it
detracts from what’s happening onscreen.

Audio

The only audio option provided is a Dolby Digital 2.0 track. Like the
video, the audio quality is less than perfect, but does the job
satisfactorily most of the time. For the musical numbers, it sounds as
though the sound technician blindly tossed a single boom mic somewhere
near the action and hoped for the best. Luckily, the sketches often
sound better than the musical performances.

Extras

On disc eight, you’ll find seven screen tests featuring Chevy Chase,
Dan Aykroyd, John Belushi, Gilda Radner, Jane Curtin, Laraine Newman
and Garrett Morris. Ranging from two to five minutes in length. These
are every bit as funny as the episodes that followed from them.
Clearly, this cast was hand-picked by God who then gave divine
inspiration Lorne Michaels. Following those lovely gems is a five
minute group-interview with Lorne and the cast on The Today Show
dated 9/27/75. Finishing out the set is a thirty-two page booklet is
included, chock full of fantastic behind the scenes photographs.

Overall

As it would turn out, this classic first season is just as great as
they say it is… (‘they’ being the elderly people who were around for
its original broadcast, such as my parents). As far as quasi-vintage
television goes, this release is well put-together set and I commend
Universal Studios for having the testicular fortitude to release an
entire season of Saturday Night Live. To even the most
casual fans, I say run, not walk, to the nearest retailer and grab your
own copy of this landmark first season. I’m Dustin McNeill and that’s
news to me.

DVDACTIVE

HEY BUDDY, CAN YOU DONGLE MY RSS?

Stories

Here’s a great piece by Robin Good at MNM


Sooner or later, and maybe without even knowing the
technical terms required to communicate this to someone else, you will
want to subscribe and monitor web sites, information pages, or online
catalog sections on an ongoing basis.

RSS_icon.gif

You have heard about RSS, webfeeds, Atom and other apparently not
too clear tech terms describing something that did sound like what you
are really in need of now, but even with all of your best will you
wouldn’t how or where to start given that those pages you have
identified do not sport any orange colored button or icon hinting to a
proper RSS feed.

Can do you generate an RSS feed for a web page that doesn’t have one?

Can anyone do this on her own?

The answer to both is a resounding YES!

Today, thanks to new “html scraping” services
available to everyone, RSS feeds can be automatically generated for
just about any web site, no matter what kind of layout, coding or
language it is written in. In some situations, to create a standard RSS
feed from any web page that does not have one may take less than a
minute, while in other cases, where your needs for customization are
higher, you may need to spend a little more time.

Morale of the story: any web page today can be made
to generate a RSS feed automatically. By the owner or, as it will
increasingly happen, by someone else who wants to be informed in
near-real-time of any news and content updates made on it.

RSS_yahoo_my_rssaddress_350.gif
Here the details:

HTML scraping or the ability to automatically
generate a standard RSS feed from a HTML document (a web page) that
does not have one has been a new type service under increasing demand
for over 2 years now.

Early services (e.g.: MyRSS) that offered HTML scraping later
disappeared or were replaced by other more profitable ones. Creating an
automatic RSS feed from a non-RSS enabled web page enables a number of
truly useful potential applications and I am sure that such services
will enjoy soon greater marketplace rewards.

FeedYes
feed_yes.gif
FeedYes is the latest entry in this small group of online services
which allow anyone to create/ generate automatically a RSS feed for any
web page. FeedYes, has really found a simple and truly effective route
to simplify this task while providing good enough a solution to satisfy
most needs.

While it is not perfect, it is damn good and fast
at doing what it does. It is alos rather simple to use, and once you
have gone through it once, creating a second feed for another site, may
take literally only a few seconds.

FeedYes is a three-step
process that involves a) providing the URL of the page out of which an
automatic RSS feed needs to be created, b) indicating among the dynamic
links found by FeedYes on the specifiied URL, which one is the first
that refers to the content section that you are interested in (all web
pages have different content sections in the same page, and you
probably do not want to create a feed for the comments section or for
the most recent articles appearing on the same site), c) indicating in
the updated list of links FeedYes will spit out the last relevant link
pertaining to your selected content section.

In this way, FeedYes isolates with good precision (you are the one
effectively guiding) the specific content section you are interested in
(say the Latest News) and creates an RSS feed for it.

Feed43
feed43_logo.gif
Feed43 is an online service that
converts standard web pages or XML documents to RSS feeds. Feed43 does
so by extracting snippets of text or HTML by applying specific search
patterns to the document from which the feed needs to be extracted. The
search patterns help Feed43 understand exactly which content to grab
from a page and which not.

This allows for a much more precise control of what
will be contained in a feed at the expense of the ease of use and
accessibility of the overall product itself. For technically savvy
users this is in fact an excellent and very reliable approach to RSS
feed generation but for non-technical users Feed43 may scare off lots
of users in a matter of minutes.

In Feed43 the set of steps required to create a custom RSS feed for a web page that has none are as follows:
a) Identify the web page from which to generate a RSS feed.
b) Create a RSS feed on Feed43 pointing to that web page.
c) Define search patterns required.
d) Specify output templates required.
e) Generate the new RSS feed.

All feeds created with Feed43 are “public”, but optionally Feed43
also allows you to protect any newly created RSS feed with a password.
The service is free.

FeedFire
feedfire_logo_170.gif
FeedFire is the oldest of these HTML-to-RSS services allowing anyone to automatically create a RSS news feed for any Web site that does not have one.

You simply register at FeedFire, input the URL of the page and
FeedFire dos the rest for you in the fraction of a second. All that’s
needed is a FULL URL to the page you would like to have made into RSS.
All bandwidth costs to host the new RSS feeds are absorbed by FeedFire.

FeedFire also allows to sponsor newly created RSS
feeds. this can be done by anyone like me and you, who are not major
corporations but people who are looking for a clever, considered and
comprehensively featured service that allows them to add extra reach,
exposure, visibility and unique content to others and/or to THEIR own
web site.

RSS feeds created and sponsored with FeedFire can also be made
private, and used for creating intelligence reports or RSS learning
objects or RSS newsmastering channels containing information otherwise
inaccessible to others.

Sponsored feeds can be further filtered by allowing the sponsor to
select only news items that “include” or do not have specific keywords.
It is also possible to customize the number of news items displayed in
the sponsored feed, the number of words per news item and even the
title and the description of the newly created RSS feed. The varying
levels of sponsorship have increasingly higher levels of features and
customisation.

Find out more.

Robin Good’s Latest News

Boeing helps CIA fly kidnapped suspects abroad for torture

Stories

(welcome tullywire!!) Be sure To Check Out The Inimitable Archives

Most stories are filtered through a multi-leveled system that includes

::what would tullywire think/have they seen this story::

BETA BLOGGING SINCE 2002 / NOW :: BROADCATCHING 1.0

Enjoy

This is a good piece from Hentoff in this weeks VILLAGE VOICE

Nat Hentoff
Have a Nice Flight

 

Boeing helps CIA fly kidnapped suspects abroad for torture
mean02.jpg

On the Boeing 737 Business Jet, Khaled el-Masri said, “all the
people were in black clothes and black masks. They put earplugs in my
ears and a sack over my head.” After putting chains on his legs, they
led him onto the plane. “They threw me on the floor and injected me

with something. I blacked out.”

—From Ghost Plane: The True Story of the CIA Torture Program,

Stephen Grey (St. Martin’s Press)

Last month, a judge in Milan, Italy, began a hearing on kidnapping
charges against 26 Americans, most of them CIA agents, that could lead
to the first trial anywhere on the CIA’s “extraordinary renditions.”
Scores of flights to torture chambers have been documented—along
with flight logs from European and American official aviation
sources—by human rights organizations and in Stephen Grey’s
extensively sourced book Ghost Plane.

The CIA agents in Italy left behind bountiful evidence of their
violations of Italian and international laws. But the U.S. will not
extradite them to Italy for doing their duty under special orders from
the president on September 17, 2001, orders that gave the agency
unprecedented latitude to engage in “clandestine intelligence activity”
in the war on terrorism.

This Bush “notification memorandum” is “Top Secret.” Vermont
senator Patrick Leahy, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, is
striving mightily to get Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to provide
him with this further proof of how the administration has been
operating—as Dick Cheney advised right after 9-11—”on the
dark side.”

In any case, the CIA kidnappers under scrutiny in Italy, along
with rampantly lawless agents elsewhere, cannot be tried in the U.S. as
long as the Military Commissions Act of 2006 is in effect. The
president got the Republican-controlled Congress, in that legislation,
to give CIA lawbreakers a retroactive get-out-of-jail-free card for
their work on “the dark side.”

Meanwhile, although the CIA “renditions” are no longer secret—and Ghost Plane
writer Grey has recently been talking about them to members of
Congress—little has been revealed about the private American
airline companies that have been supplying the CIA with the planes to
transport the shackled, blindfolded, drugged passengers for
interrogation in foreign torture chambers.

But now The New Yorker‘s Jane Mayer—in her most
recent meticulously documented report on the execution of this
administration’s violations of our own War Crimes Act and the Geneva
Conventions—has revealed the complicity of the world’s largest
aerospace company, Boeing, in some of these CIA kidnappings.

Her investigation, “The CIA’s Travel Agent,” appeared in the October 30 New Yorker;
but oblivious to her disclosures, Boeing has been receiving a
celebratory press: “Boeing Takes Lead in Aircraft Orders: Company Tops
Airbus for the First Time Since 2000” (Washington Post, January 17) and “Why Boeing’s Flying High” (George Will’s widely syndicated column, in the January 18 New York Post).

Mayer found out that Boeing has a subsidiary—Jeppesen
International Trip Planning, based in San Jose, California—that
proclaims it “offers everything needed for efficient, hassle-free,
international flight operations . . . from Aachen to Zhengzhou.”

A number of American charter airlines—front companies
for the CIA—are involved in “renditions,” but, Mayer notes, the
Boeing subsidiary handles “many of the logistical and navigational
details—including flight plans, clearance to fly over other
countries, hotel reservations, and ground-crew arrangements.”

Consider the kidnapped Khaled el-Masri’s account of the CIA
flight attendants in black clothes and black masks who took him in a
Boeing 737 Business Jet to Afghanistan to be tortured. The flight plans
for el-Masri’s unforgettable trip were prepared, Mayer reports, by the
superbly reliable Boeing subsidiary, Jeppesen International Trip
Planning.

She quotes a former Jeppesen employee about what Jeppesen’s
managing director, Bob Overby, said at an internal corporate meeting:
“We do all of the extraordinary renditions flights—you know, the
torture flights. Let’s face it, some of those flights end up that way .
. . It certainly pays well.”

Overby didn’t return any of Mayer’s phone calls. When I tried
to reach Overby in San Jose, I couldn’t even get put through to his
office. And Boeing headquarters in Chicago told me it was unaware of
that subsidiary. (This was after Mayer’s article appeared.)

With ACLU attorney Ben Wizner, Khaled el-Masri is trying to
sue the CIA—and Boeing may, in time, be included as a defendant.
Federal District Judge T.S. Ellis III would not even start a trial
because the government invoked the “state secrets” privilege. But as
Wizner said (The New York Times, November 29), the trial would
only confirm “what the entire world entirely knows” from reports in the
world press. (The case is on appeal.)

As I noted in a previous column, Judge Ellis did moisten his
decision dismissing the case in the lower court with crocodile tears,
saying el-Masri might have suffered a great injustice, but the judge’s
hands were tied by the Justice Department’s “state secrets” maneuver.

Not incidentally, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice—in
her previous post as National Security Adviser—had ordered Khalid
el-Masri released in May 2004. Sorry, she said, he had been mistakenly
identified as being connected to terrorism. (She did not say who
misfingered him.)

Khaled el-Masri, who hasn’t been able to get a job since his
release, is suing for damages, but primarily, he says, he’d like an
apology. He is as likely to get one from the CIA or Commander in Chief
Bush as he is from the world’s largest aerospace company.

When the CIA is Boeing’s client, does Jeppesen supply the
black masks too? On January 31, German prosecutors issued arrest
warrants for 13 CIA agents involved in the rendition of el-Masri.
Involved in the kidnapping, said the prosecutors, was a Boeing plane.

HOW MANY WAYS IS JONAH GOLDBERG AN ASSFACE?

Stories

countdown-ww-jonah.jpg

It appears Keith picked up on the pathetically wrong prediction/bet Jonah Goldberg made two years ago and calls him out on it on national television.

video_wmv Download (5499) | Play (4966)  video_mov Download (2114) | Play (2999)

Jonah Goldberg…less prophetic than pathetic”

THE PENTAGON LIED AND GOT WAR

Stories

 

By ROBERT BURNS, AP Military

Pentagon officials undercut the intelligence community in the run-up
to the U.S. invasion of Iraq by insisting in briefings to the White
House that there was a clear relationship between Saddam Hussein and
al-Qaida, the Defense Department’s inspector general said Friday.

Acting Inspector General Thomas F. Gimble told the Senate Armed
Services Committee that the office headed by former Pentagon policy
chief Douglas J. Feith took “inappropriate” actions in advancing
conclusions on al-Qaida connections not backed up by the nation’s
intelligence agencies.

Gimble said that while the actions of the Office of the Under
Secretary of Defense for Policy “were not illegal or unauthorized,”
they “did not provide the most accurate analysis of intelligence to
senior decision makers” at a time when the White House was moving
toward war with Iraq.

“I can’t think of a more devastating commentary,” said Armed
Services Committee Chairman Sen. Carl Levin (news, bio, voting record),
D-Mich.

He cited Gimble’s findings that Feith’s office was, despite doubts
expressed by the intelligence community, pushing conclusions that Sept.
11 hijacker Mohammed Atta had met an Iraqi intelligence officer in
Prague five months before the attack, and that there were “multiple
areas of cooperation” between Iraq and al-Qaida, including shared
pursuit of weapons of mass destruction.

“That was the argument that was used to make the sale to the
American people about the need to go to war,” Levin said in an
interview Thursday. He said the Pentagon’s work, “which was wrong,
which was distorted, which was inappropriate … is something which is
highly disturbing.”

Rep. Ike Skelton (news, bio, voting record), D-Mo., chairman of the
House Armed Services Committee, said Friday the report “clearly shows
that Doug Feith and others in that office exercised extremely poor
judgment for which our nation, and our service members in particular,
are paying a terrible price.”

Republicans on the panel disagreed. Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Okla., said
the “probing questions” raised by Feith’s policy group improved the
intelligence process.

“I’m trying to figure out why we are here,” said Sen. Saxby
Chambliss (news, bio, voting record), R-Ga., saying the office was
doing its job of analyzing intelligence that had been gathered by the
CIA and other intelligence agencies.

Gimble responded that at issue was that the information supplied by
Feith’s office in briefings to the National Security Council and the
office of Vice President Dick Cheney was “provided without caveats”
that there were varying opinions on its reliability.

Gimble’s report said Feith’s office had made assertions “that were
inconsistent with the consensus of the intelligence community.”

At the White House, spokesman Dana Perino said President Bush has
revamped the U.S. spy community to try avoiding a repeat of flawed
intelligence affecting policy decisions by creating a director of
national intelligence and making other changes.

“I think what he has said is that he took responsibility, and that
the intel was wrong, and that we had to take measures to revamp the
intel community to make sure that it never happened again,” Perino told
reporters.

Defense Department spokesman Bryan Whitman denied that the office
was producing its own intelligence products, saying they were
challenging what was coming in from intelligence-gathering
professionals, “looking at it with a critical eye.”

Some Democrats also have contended that Feith misled Congress about
the basis of the administration’s assertions on the threat posed by
Iraq, but the Pentagon investigation did not support that.

In a telephone interview Thursday, Levin said the IG report is “very
damning” and shows a Pentagon policy shop trying to shape intelligence
to prove a link between al-Qaida and Saddam.

Levin in September 2005 had asked the inspector general to determine
whether Feith’s office’s activities were appropriate, and if not, what
remedies should be pursued.

The 2004 report from the Sept. 11 commission found no evidence of a
collaborative relationship between Saddam and Osama bin Laden’s
al-Qaida terror organization before the U.S. invasion.

Asked to comment on the IG’s findings, Feith said in a
telephone interview that he had not seen the report but was pleased to
hear that it concluded his office’s activities were neither illegal nor
unauthorized. He took strong issue, however, with the finding that some
activities had been “inappropriate.”

“The policy office has been smeared for years by allegations
that its pre-Iraq-war work was somehow ‘unlawful’ or ‘unauthorized’ and
that some information it gave to congressional committees was deceptive
or misleading,” said Feith, who left his Pentagon post in August 2005.

Feith called “bizarre” the inspector general’s conclusion that
some intelligence activities by the Office of Special Plans, which was
created while Feith served as the undersecretary of defense for policy
— the top policy position under then-Defense Secretary Donald H.
Rumsfeld — were inappropriate but not unauthorized.

CHRIS SHAYS BULLIES CONTRACTOR'S WIVES, WHINES UNTIL WAXMAN PULLS THE PLUG

Stories


DON’T INTERRUPT ME, DON’T INTERRUPT ME!


Rep. Chris Shays is a real class act.

Here’s
the pride and joy of the 4th District repeatedly admonishing Katy
Helvenston-Wettengel (who was only trying to answer Shays questions
within his endless and shameless rant).

Who
is Katy Helvenston-Wettengel you ask? Well, she just happens to be one
of the relatives of the four American contractors who providing private
security in Iraq that were ambushed by a mob and their bodies dragged through the streets of Fallujah.
Helvenston-Wettengel, and three other relatives of the victims,
testified before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
about the outrageous conditions the contractors were forced to deal
with while in Iraq (i.e., lack of body armour, lack of amour ed cars,
no maps, etc).

After
these individuals fought back tears testifying about the recounting how
the contractors, were sent out into the meat grinder called Iraq
without the protective equipment they were promised, the Republicans
wasted no time and doing what they do best…attack the messenger.
Shays grilling and belittling of Helvenston-Wettengel was so offensive
that Rep. Henry Waxman apparently had enough of the 4th District
Congressman and pulled the plug on him.

Watch and puke.

ConnecticutBLOG