I. LEWIS SCOOTER LIBBY GUILTY ON FOUR OF FIVE COUNTS OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND PERJURY

Stories

LAWRENCE SCOOTER LIBBY GUILTY ON FOUR OF FIVE COUNTS OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE

Making Martial Law Easier

Stories

Making Martial Law Easier – New York Times:

A disturbing recent phenomenon in Washington is that laws that strike to the heart of American democracy have been passed in the dead of night. So it was with a provision quietly tucked into the enormous defense budget bill at the Bush administration’s behest that makes it easier for a president to override local control of law enforcement and declare martial law. The provision, signed into law in October, weakens two obscure but important bulwarks of liberty. One is the doctrine that bars military forces, including a federalized National Guard, from engaging in law enforcement. Called posse comitatus, it was enshrined in law after the Civil War to preserve the line between civil government and the military. The other is the Insurrection Act of 1807, which provides the major exemptions to posse comitatus. It essentially limits a president’s use of the military in law enforcement to putting down lawlessness, insurrection and rebellion, where a state is violating federal law or depriving people of constitutional rights. The newly enacted provisions upset this careful balance. They shift the focus from making sure that federal laws are enforced to restoring public order. Beyond cases of actual insurrection, the president may now use military troops as a domestic police force in response to a natural disaster, a disease outbreak, terrorist attack or to any “other condition.” Changes of this magnitude should be made only after a thorough public airing. But these new presidential powers were slipped into the law without hearings or public debate. The president made no mention of the changes when he signed the measure, and neither the White House nor Congress consulted in advance with the nation’s governors. There is a bipartisan bill, introduced by Senators Patrick Leahy, Democrat of Vermont, and Christopher Bond, Republican of Missouri, and backed unanimously by the nation’s governors, that would repeal the stealthy revisions. Congress should pass it. If changes of this kind are proposed in the future, they must get a full and open debate.

Boeing helps CIA fly kidnapped suspects abroad for torture

Stories

(welcome tullywire!!) Be sure To Check Out The Inimitable Archives

Most stories are filtered through a multi-leveled system that includes

::what would tullywire think/have they seen this story::

BETA BLOGGING SINCE 2002 / NOW :: BROADCATCHING 1.0

Enjoy

This is a good piece from Hentoff in this weeks VILLAGE VOICE

Nat Hentoff
Have a Nice Flight

 

Boeing helps CIA fly kidnapped suspects abroad for torture
mean02.jpg

On the Boeing 737 Business Jet, Khaled el-Masri said, “all the
people were in black clothes and black masks. They put earplugs in my
ears and a sack over my head.” After putting chains on his legs, they
led him onto the plane. “They threw me on the floor and injected me

with something. I blacked out.”

—From Ghost Plane: The True Story of the CIA Torture Program,

Stephen Grey (St. Martin’s Press)

Last month, a judge in Milan, Italy, began a hearing on kidnapping
charges against 26 Americans, most of them CIA agents, that could lead
to the first trial anywhere on the CIA’s “extraordinary renditions.”
Scores of flights to torture chambers have been documented—along
with flight logs from European and American official aviation
sources—by human rights organizations and in Stephen Grey’s
extensively sourced book Ghost Plane.

The CIA agents in Italy left behind bountiful evidence of their
violations of Italian and international laws. But the U.S. will not
extradite them to Italy for doing their duty under special orders from
the president on September 17, 2001, orders that gave the agency
unprecedented latitude to engage in “clandestine intelligence activity”
in the war on terrorism.

This Bush “notification memorandum” is “Top Secret.” Vermont
senator Patrick Leahy, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, is
striving mightily to get Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to provide
him with this further proof of how the administration has been
operating—as Dick Cheney advised right after 9-11—”on the
dark side.”

In any case, the CIA kidnappers under scrutiny in Italy, along
with rampantly lawless agents elsewhere, cannot be tried in the U.S. as
long as the Military Commissions Act of 2006 is in effect. The
president got the Republican-controlled Congress, in that legislation,
to give CIA lawbreakers a retroactive get-out-of-jail-free card for
their work on “the dark side.”

Meanwhile, although the CIA “renditions” are no longer secret—and Ghost Plane
writer Grey has recently been talking about them to members of
Congress—little has been revealed about the private American
airline companies that have been supplying the CIA with the planes to
transport the shackled, blindfolded, drugged passengers for
interrogation in foreign torture chambers.

But now The New Yorker‘s Jane Mayer—in her most
recent meticulously documented report on the execution of this
administration’s violations of our own War Crimes Act and the Geneva
Conventions—has revealed the complicity of the world’s largest
aerospace company, Boeing, in some of these CIA kidnappings.

Her investigation, “The CIA’s Travel Agent,” appeared in the October 30 New Yorker;
but oblivious to her disclosures, Boeing has been receiving a
celebratory press: “Boeing Takes Lead in Aircraft Orders: Company Tops
Airbus for the First Time Since 2000” (Washington Post, January 17) and “Why Boeing’s Flying High” (George Will’s widely syndicated column, in the January 18 New York Post).

Mayer found out that Boeing has a subsidiary—Jeppesen
International Trip Planning, based in San Jose, California—that
proclaims it “offers everything needed for efficient, hassle-free,
international flight operations . . . from Aachen to Zhengzhou.”

A number of American charter airlines—front companies
for the CIA—are involved in “renditions,” but, Mayer notes, the
Boeing subsidiary handles “many of the logistical and navigational
details—including flight plans, clearance to fly over other
countries, hotel reservations, and ground-crew arrangements.”

Consider the kidnapped Khaled el-Masri’s account of the CIA
flight attendants in black clothes and black masks who took him in a
Boeing 737 Business Jet to Afghanistan to be tortured. The flight plans
for el-Masri’s unforgettable trip were prepared, Mayer reports, by the
superbly reliable Boeing subsidiary, Jeppesen International Trip
Planning.

She quotes a former Jeppesen employee about what Jeppesen’s
managing director, Bob Overby, said at an internal corporate meeting:
“We do all of the extraordinary renditions flights—you know, the
torture flights. Let’s face it, some of those flights end up that way .
. . It certainly pays well.”

Overby didn’t return any of Mayer’s phone calls. When I tried
to reach Overby in San Jose, I couldn’t even get put through to his
office. And Boeing headquarters in Chicago told me it was unaware of
that subsidiary. (This was after Mayer’s article appeared.)

With ACLU attorney Ben Wizner, Khaled el-Masri is trying to
sue the CIA—and Boeing may, in time, be included as a defendant.
Federal District Judge T.S. Ellis III would not even start a trial
because the government invoked the “state secrets” privilege. But as
Wizner said (The New York Times, November 29), the trial would
only confirm “what the entire world entirely knows” from reports in the
world press. (The case is on appeal.)

As I noted in a previous column, Judge Ellis did moisten his
decision dismissing the case in the lower court with crocodile tears,
saying el-Masri might have suffered a great injustice, but the judge’s
hands were tied by the Justice Department’s “state secrets” maneuver.

Not incidentally, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice—in
her previous post as National Security Adviser—had ordered Khalid
el-Masri released in May 2004. Sorry, she said, he had been mistakenly
identified as being connected to terrorism. (She did not say who
misfingered him.)

Khaled el-Masri, who hasn’t been able to get a job since his
release, is suing for damages, but primarily, he says, he’d like an
apology. He is as likely to get one from the CIA or Commander in Chief
Bush as he is from the world’s largest aerospace company.

When the CIA is Boeing’s client, does Jeppesen supply the
black masks too? On January 31, German prosecutors issued arrest
warrants for 13 CIA agents involved in the rendition of el-Masri.
Involved in the kidnapping, said the prosecutors, was a Boeing plane.

President Nominates Cheney's Son-in-Law

Stories

KEEP AN EYE OUT….

By John Mintz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, April 1, 2005; Page A25

President Bush has
nominated Vice President Cheney’s son-in-law, a prominent Washington
lawyer who represents companies in the homeland security field, to be
the general counsel of the Department of Homeland Security.

President Nominates Cheney’s Son-in-Law (washingtonpost.com)

DISCONTINUATION OF STATE DEPARTMENT TERROR REPORT RAISES EYEBROWS

Stories

Apr. 22, 2005

DISCONTINUATION OF STATE DEPARTMENT TERROR REPORT RAISES EYEBROWS.
Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., asked for an investigation this week after
the State Department announced that after 19 years, it would no longer annually publish terrorist attack numbers,
Reuters reported Thursday. The decision “denies the public access to
information about the incidence of terrorism,” he said in
correspondence to the acting State Department inspector general in
which he asked what political concerns, if any, motivated the
discontinuation. The 2004 statistics contradicted the Bush
administration’s claims that the war on terror was making progress.
A spokesman for the State Department, Richard Boucher, answered the press corps’ questions about the decision
on Monday morning, saying that responsibility for the report has simply
been shifted to the National Counterterrorism Center because “the 9/11
Commission recommended and the Congress passed legislation called the
Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 that
established the National Counterterrorism Center as the primary
organization in the U.S. Government for analysis of global terrorism.”

Behind the Homefront

Army investigates war contractors

Stories

KANSAS CITY DOT COM

Up to 50 criminal cases involving alleged fraud, bribery and abuse have been opened.
The Associated PressWASHINGTON | Army investigators have opened up to 50 criminal investigations involving battlefield contractors in the war in Iraq and the U.S. fight against terrorism, The Associated Press has learned.

They include high-dollar fraud, conspiracy, bribery, and bid rigging.

Senior contracting officials, government employees, residents of other countries and, in some cases, U.S. military personnel have been implicated in millions of dollars of fraud allegations.

“All of these involve operations in Iraq, Afghanistan and Kuwait,” Chris Grey, a spokesman for the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command, confirmed Saturday.

Battlefield contractors have been implicated in allegations of fraud and abuse since the war in Iraq began in spring 2003. A special inspector general office that focused solely on reconstruction spending in Iraq developed cases that led to four criminal convictions.

The problems stem in part from the Pentagon’s struggle to get a handle on the unprecedented number of contractors now helping run the nation’s wars. Contractors are used in battle zones to do nearly everything but fight.

Special agents from the Army’s major procurement fraud unit recently were dispatched to Iraq, Afghanistan and Kuwait, where they are “working closely and sharing information with other law enforcement agencies in the region,” Grey said.

One case involves an Army chief warrant officer accused of taking a $50,000 bribe to steer a contract for paper products and plastic flatware away from a government contractor and to a Kuwaiti company, according to court records.

“One More Shot” Bill Kristol

Stories

tds-kristol.jpg

General Kristol appeared on The Daily Show last night and Jon Stewart didn’t pull any punches, challenging every single delusional neocon talking point he tried to put forward.

Video WMP | Video MOV

Kristol’s other appearance on the show can be found here (16MB WMV)

Tom Donahue is possibly the most powerful business lobbyist in D.C.

Stories

AlterNet: It’s hard to precisely define the political establishment, the fixed group of financiers, political operatives, journalists, and politicians who make up the swirl of right-wing power in Washington D.C. But if it’s not always simple to define in its totality, one man stands out as an innovative and particularly venal power broker: Thomas Donahue, President and CEO of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

In a lot of ways, the new challenge after the 2006 elections for the progressive movement boils down to finding the unethical and unaccountable purveyors of systemic corruption and rooting them out. It is these forces that put Bush in the White House and reelected him. It is these forces that corrupt both parties. It is these forces that are going to fight tooth and nail to defeat the Democratic majority, while attempting to also corrupt it from within.

Fortunately, in this case, we can put a face to the force. Tom Donahue is possibly the most powerful business lobbyist in D.C. Most recently, he has been pushing aggressively to weaken the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which was passed in the wake of the Enron scandal to ensure corporate accountability and protect investors. And right now, he’s reeling, because he’s been caught in an unethical stock scandal of his own.

powered by performancing firefox