I’ve got a feeling that Youtube
is going to be manipulated along with the new
algorithem to create a monster that will kick Digg-Baiting’s ass
John Tully
The New York Herald Sun
Hint: Flame Wars in the comments section
I’ve got a feeling that Youtube
is going to be manipulated along with the new
algorithem to create a monster that will kick Digg-Baiting’s ass
John Tully
The New York Herald Sun
Hint: Flame Wars in the comments section

above: HOW OUR FRIENDS HONOR THEIR DEAD
As Howard Dean’s behavior in the past days has become more
and more curious, it has also become more and more outlandish.
Dean continues to lash out at John Kerry as one who is hostage
to “the special interests” and even went so far as to
call him a Republican, no less. Dean’s proclivity for becoming
unhinged continues apace. Hardly a day passes without Dean providing
further proof that he is not fit to be the President of the United
States, let alone a primary election candidate.
It is a shame Dean doesn’t get it. He is finished, and as
Laurence O’Donnell of MSNBC so aptly put it on Dennis
Miller Live, Dean was already finished before his post Iowa
tirade. Laurence also astutely pointed out how embarrassing it
was for Al Gore and Bill Bradley to get suckered in to endorsing
Dr. Dean. As we suggested earlier on this site Dean probably peaked
on the day Gore endorsed him. From then on it was all down hill.
From: Analyze-Media.com/Television.html
Apr. 22, 2005
DISCONTINUATION OF STATE DEPARTMENT TERROR REPORT RAISES EYEBROWS.
Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., asked for an investigation this week after
the State Department announced that after 19 years, it would no longer annually publish terrorist attack numbers,
Reuters reported Thursday. The decision “denies the public access to
information about the incidence of terrorism,” he said in
correspondence to the acting State Department inspector general in
which he asked what political concerns, if any, motivated the
discontinuation. The 2004 statistics contradicted the Bush
administration’s claims that the war on terror was making progress.
A spokesman for the State Department, Richard Boucher, answered the press corps’ questions about the decision
on Monday morning, saying that responsibility for the report has simply
been shifted to the National Counterterrorism Center because “the 9/11
Commission recommended and the Congress passed legislation called the
Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 that
established the National Counterterrorism Center as the primary
organization in the U.S. Government for analysis of global terrorism.”
Behind the Homefront
By:
Nicole Belle
Let
no one doubt that the blogosphere–even just a lone
blogger–has the power to frame and shape the national
debate. This story still has legs in the traditional media
because the blogosphere has continued to push back after ABC/Disney’s
strong-arm tactics. Go Spocko.
In a dispute between the “new media” of the Internet
and the “old media” of broadcasting, liberal bloggers and conservative
talk-radio hosts are accusing each other of trampling the First
Amendment’s guarantees of free speech.[..]Some advertisers, including Bank of America and MasterCard,
have deserted KSFO since an anonymous media critic identifying himself
online as Spocko began posting recordings of the station’s “Hot Talk”
hosts. Spocko and some of his readers have been e-mailing the audio to
KSFO advertisers since 2005, asking the companies whether they want to
be associated with the controversial rhetoric.The First Amendment flap was debated Sunday on CNN’s
Reliable Sources. Dan Riehl, a blogger critical of Spocko, said some of
the radio hosts’ comments “were blown out of proportion or
misrepresented” in the complaints to sponsors. Mike Stark, another
blogger and a Spocko ally, said: “The way to fight free speech that you
disagree with is to engage in more free speech. And that’s exactly what
Spocko did.”[..]”Yes, this is a freedom of speech issue, and this individual
is entitled to say what he wants to,” Morgan told the San Francisco
Chronicle. “But he’s trying to take away my livelihood, and I’m not
trying to take away his.”(EFF attorney Matt) Zimmerman says Spocko’s rights are in more
peril than the station’s. “ABC/Disney tried to use the legal process to
silence a critic who was actually amplifying their speech,” he says. “Spocko was doing exactly what the First Amendment is designed to do – promote this marketplace of ideas.”
General Kristol appeared on The Daily Show last night and Jon Stewart didn’t pull any punches, challenging every single delusional neocon talking point he tried to put forward.
Kristol’s other appearance on the show can be found here (16MB WMV)
George Will Distorts WaPo’s Own Reporting To Smear Jim Webb
By Greg Sargent | bioThis is one of the rankest displays of journalistic dishonesty I’ve seen in some time. In today’s Washington Post column, George Will assails Dem Senator-elect Jim Webb over his now-well-known confrontation with President Bush at a White House reception. To do so, Will badly distorts the reporting his own paper did on the episode, and it’s quite clear his distortions were entirely deliberate.First, let’s check out how Will recounts the episode in his column.
Will writes:
Wednesday’s Post reported that at a White House reception for newly elected members of Congress, Webb “tried to avoid President Bush,” refusing to pass through the reception line or have his picture taken with the president. When Bush asked Webb, whose son is a Marine in Iraq, “How’s your boy?” Webb replied, “I’d like to get them [sic] out of Iraq.” When the president again asked “How’s your boy?” Webb replied, “That’s between me and my boy.”
Will says the episode demonstrates Webb’s “calculated rudeness toward another human being” — i.e., the President — who “asked a civil and caring question, as one parent to another.”
But do you notice something missing from Will’s recounting of the episode?
Here’s how the Washingon Post actually reported on the episode the day before Will’s column:
At a recent White House reception for freshman members of Congress, Virginia’s newest senator tried to avoid President Bush. Democrat James Webb declined to stand in a presidential receiving line or to have his picture taken with the man he had often criticized on the stump this fall. But it wasn’t long before Bush found him.
“How’s your boy?” Bush asked, referring to Webb’s son, a Marine serving in Iraq.
“I’d like to get them out of Iraq, Mr. President,” Webb responded, echoing a campaign theme.
“That’s not what I asked you,” Bush said. “How’s your boy?”
“That’s between me and my boy, Mr. President,” Webb said coldly, ending the conversation on the State Floor of the East Wing of the White House.
See what happened? Will omitted the pissy retort from the President that provoked Webb. Will cut out the line from the President where he said: “That’s not what I asked you.” In Will’s recounting, that instead became a sign of Bush’s parental solicitiousness: “The president again asked `How’s your boy?'”
Will’s change completely alters the tenor of the conversation from one in which Bush was rude first to Webb, which is what the Post’s original account suggested, to one in which Webb was inexplicably rude to the President, which is how Will wanted to represent what happened.
It’s virtually impossible to see how that could have been the result of mere incompetence on Will’s part. Rather, it’s very clear that Will cut the line because it was an inconvenient impediment to his journalistic goal, which was to portray Webb as a “boor” who was rude to the Commander in Chief, and to show that this new upstart is a threat to Washington’s alleged code of “civility and clear speaking” (his words). On that score, also note that in the original version, Webb said “Mr. President” twice — and neither appeared in Will’s version.
You’d think such an obvious misrepresentation would irritate the Post’s top brass. You’d think they would be annoyed with Will for sullying their pages with such journalistic misbehavior. Indeed, it’s kind of amusing to imagine what went through Will’s mind as he cut and pasted the Post’s original reporting and then hit the delete button to get rid of the inconvenient quote. Did he think to himself, “Yeah, this is bad, but no one will notice”? Or did he think, “What the heck — people will notice, but it won’t affect my professional or social standing, so who cares”?
Paging Howard Kurtz: Do you consider your colleague’s effort journalistically acceptable? I don’t. This was a really bad one.
Crooks and Liars » 2006 » December » 18:
John MCain is a Saint—don’t ya know!. As Chris Matthews tells us:
“Every time I look at a poll. And I expect McCain to win everyone of these polls. The press loves McCain. We’re his base I think sometimes.”
The “press loves McCain” narrative is made crystal clear by Newsweek when they failed to mention the polling data from their big cover story about Hillary and Obama:” Is America Ready?” Hillary beat McCain and Giuliani in their own internal poll. Wouldn’t that have been a huge story? Matthews constantly tells his audience that Giuliani and McCain destroy Hillary in every poll he sees. Early polls don’t really very mean much at all, but you can see how the media narrative is being played out already.
This might be the first poll I’ve seen with Hillary beating the Saint. Why isn’t Newsweek shouting it from the rafters? Steve runs the data down.
* Asked to choose between Hillary Clinton and John McCain, Clinton enjoyed a seven-point lead in the Newsweek poll, 50% to 43%. (Among self-identified independents, with whom McCain is supposed to excel, the two were tied at 45% each.)
* Asked to choose between Hillary Clinton and Rudy Giuliani, Clinton led 48% to 47%.
* Asked to choose between Hillary Clinton and Mitt Romney, Clinton is ahead 58% to 32%.
* Asked to choose between Barack Obama and John McCain, McCain’s lead was only two points, 45% to 43%, despite the fact that a far larger percentage of respondents said they weren’t very familiar with Obama.
* Obama trailed Giuliani by a similar margin (47% to 44%), and led Romney, 55% to 25%….read on”
Just an abdication of any sense of journalism. Tip O’Neill is twirling in his grave.
Three things that are most troubling about this goddamned case lately: 1: Lawrence O’Donnell at the end of this summer, all of a sudden declares on Olbermann’s Countdown program that it’s all over(the Fitzgerald case) and that it was much ado about nothing (possibly in reference to Armitage’s confession/reveal that he was blabbing about Valerie Wilson as well around that time) 2: Bob Woodward’s complete skullduggery about this sickening political payback/blowback and his public, blatant disregard for honest disclosure about his direct involvement in this possible illegal act while simultaneously mocking it in the press. 3: That Washington Post Op-Ed after the Armitage reveal. Worst day in their history.
Disgusting.
JT
New York Herald Sun