Hillary Clinton
Bill Maher | March 7 2008 | Complete Show + New Rules
Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Iraq, Jeremy Scahill, Jobs, Joe Scarborough, John McCain, Mortgage Crisis, Ohio, Politics, Real Time, Rieckhoff, Subprime, terrorism, Texas, The Nation, Tullycast, Wall StreetSen Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) revives campaign with Ohio, Texas wins
Barack Obama, Election 2008, Hillary Clinton, Ohio, Politics, Steve-O, Texas
MSNBC.com |
BREAKING NEWS
NBC News and MSNBC
updated 12:51 a.m. ET, Wed., March. 5, 2008
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton threw up a roadblock on Sen. Barack Obama’s path to the Democratic presidential nomination by winning the giant Ohio and Texas primaries, NBC News projected Wednesday morning.
“For everyone here in Ohio and across America who’s been counted out and refused to be knocked out, and for everyone who has stumbled but stood right back up, and for everyone who works hard and never gives up, this one is for you,” Clinton said at a raucous rally in Columbus on a night when she took both of the two major prizes on offer.
Clinton, D-N.Y., and Obama, D-Ill., split the smaller Rhode Island and Vermont primaries, according to NBC News .
Delegates to the Democratic National Convention are awarded proportionally, and those numbers will not be available until all returns are in. Going into Tuesday’s balloting, Obama led Clinton by 1,194-1,037, according to NBC News’ count.
Meanwhile, Sen. John McCain of Arizona wrapped up the Republican nomination after he won all four contests, NBC News projected. His only remaining serious rival, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, withdrew from the race Tuesday night.
Ohio results unclear amid confusion
In all, there were 370 Democratic delegates at stake Tuesday night, most of them in Ohio and Texas, where Clinton had banked on stemming Obama’s momentum.
Balloting was described as confusing across Ohio, where election workers reported a record turnout of voters asked to use new or unfamiliar methods to tabulate votes after the turmoil of the 2000 election.
Voting was also described as confusing in Texas, where nearly half of delegates were being chosen in evening caucuses after the polls closed. The Clinton campaign alleged that Obama supporters were confiscating precinct chairmen’s manuals at the caucuses, as well as locking out Clinton supporters.
The process did not discourage Texas Democrats, who, because the nomination remained open, had their first chance in many years to have an impact on the contest. It appeared that the turnout would set a state record, and some polling places were still open more than two hours after closing time to accommodate voters waiting in line.
“This is the first time that I can remember, maybe in the last 20 years, that voting in the Democratic primary, as I have, makes such a big difference in the national election,” said Robin Melvin, a voter in Austin.
Candidates hold bases in exit polls
Just a few weeks ago, Clinton had a strong lead in Ohio and Texas polls, and her campaign expected the states to stand as bulwarks against Obama’s string of victories that gained momentum on Super Tuesday.
Final polls going into Tuesday’s voting showed he had closed the margin significantly, but surveys of voters as they left their polling places in Ohio indicated that Clinton held onto her robust support from groups that have been the foundation of her candidacy, taking strong margins among white, blue-collar and older voters.
The Ohio exit polls showed that Obama did not do as well as he had in recent contests in eroding her support from those groups. Clinton also did a bit better among Ohio voters who chose their candidate in recent days, suggesting that she may have benefited from her aggressive attacks on what she called his lack of seasoning.
In Texas, the two candidates did best in parts of the state where they spent the most time campaigning — Clinton in predominantly Latino South Texas and Obama in major metropolitan areas and Austin, the capital and the state’s most liberal city. And they did well among their core constituencies.
Clinton ran especially strong among Latinos, whom she had counted on in a state where she and former President Bill Clinton have political ties dating to the early 1970s. Exit polls indicated that she was winning two-thirds of the Latino vote. Likewise, Obama won by strong margins among black voters, with a nearly 6-to-1 edge.
The difference may have been in the demographics: African-Americans accounted for 20 percent of the Democratic primary voters, but Latinos made up more than 30 percent.
“I think tonight’s going to be a huge night,” said Terry McAuliffe, Clinton’s campaign chairman.
“It feels very good,” he said in an interview on MSNBC. “I think we’re going to win both Texas and Ohio.”
But Obama sounded a confident note Tuesday night, telling cheering supporters in San Antonio that the race was still a toss-up.
“No matter what happens tonight, we have nearly the same delegate lead as we did this morning, and we are on our way to winning this nomination,” he said.
David Axelrod, a senior adviser to Obama, argued that the Ohio result actually demonstrated Obama’s strength, noting that pre-election polls showed him trailing Clinton by as many as 20 points just three weeks ago.
In an interview with NBC News, Axelrod predicted that the night would end up being a “wash,” saying nothing would be decided until primaries later in Wyoming, Mississippi and Pennsylvania.
Ohio, Texas critical for Clinton
Some of Clinton’s supporters — her husband, the former president, among them — agreed that she needed to outpoll Obama in both Texas and Ohio to sustain her candidacy.
“We’re going on, we’re going strong, and we’re going all the way,” she said.
But Obama was just as optimistic.
“We can stand up with confidence and clarity,” he said “We are on our way to winning this nomination.”
It takes 2,025 delegates to win the Democratic nomination, and slightly more than 600 remained to be picked in the 10 states that vote after Tuesday.
By Alex Johnson of msnbc.com with Andrea Mitchell, Shawna Thomas and Ron Allen of NBC News. NBC affiliates KPRC of Houston; KXAN of Austin, Texas; WCMH of Columbus, Ohio; and WKYC of Cleveland contributed to this report.
var url=location.href;var i=url.indexOf(‘/did/’) + 1;if(i==0){i=url.indexOf(‘/print/1/’) + 1;}if(i==0){i=url.indexOf(‘&print=1’);}if(i>0){url = url.substring(0,i);document.write(‘URL: ‘+url+’
‘);if(window.print){window.print()}else{alert(‘To print his page press Ctrl-P on your keyboard nor choose print from your browser or device after clicking OK’);}}URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23463159/
02/29/2008 | Bill Maher | Complete+O V E R T I M E
Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Blogs, Broadcatching, Castro, Cuba, David Frum, Democrats, Dick Cheney, Douglas Feith, Election 2008, Elliot Abrams, Farrakan, FISA, George Bush, Guantanamo, Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Lobbyists, Nedra Pickler, Neocon, New York Times, Osama Bin Laden, Peter Hoekstra, PNAC, Politics, Richard Mellon Scaife, Rush Limbaugh, Saddam Hussein, Tullycast, Weekly StandardBill Maher | February 22, 2008 | Complete w/ New Rules and Overtime
9/11, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Blogs, Broadcatching, Castro, Cuba, David Frum, Democrats, Dick Cheney, Douglas Feith, Election 2008, Elliot Abrams, FISA, George Bush, Guantanamo, Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Lobbyists, Neocon, New York Times, Osama Bin Laden, PNAC, Politics, Richard Mellon Scaife, Rush Limbaugh, Saddam Hussein, Tullycast, Weekly Standard, YoutubeTullycast
Andrew Tully, Baker Botts, Barack Obama, Bechtel, Bill Clinton, Carlyle Group, CIA, Dick Cheney, Don Rumsfeld, Douglas Feith, Duke Ziebert, Election 2008, Elliot Abrams, Halliburton, Hillary Clinton, Iran/Contra, Joe Wilson, John McCain, Judith Miller, Karl Rove, KBR, Kellogg Brown and Root, Lee Atwater, Osama Bin Laden, PNAC, Politics, Richard Mellon Scaife, Saddam Hussein, Scooter Libby, Tullycast, Tullycasts, Valerie Plame, Viveca Novak, Watergate, YoutubeBill Maher | February 15 2008 + New Rules
Andrew Sullivan, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Buffonery, D.C., Election 2008, Frank Luntz, George W. Bush, Hillary Clinton, Iraq, John McCain, MSM, Politics, Tullycast, Writers StrikeAmbassador Joseph Wilson Endorses Hillary Clinton; Calls Her "Battle Tested"
Barack Obama, David Corn, Dick Cheney, Douglas Feith, Election 2008, Elliot Abrams, Hillary Clinton, Jane Hamsher, Joe Wilson, John McCain, Judge Thomas F. Hogan, Judith Millaer, Karl Rove, Marcy Wheeler, Matt Cooper, Patrick Fitzgerald, Richard Mellon Scaife, Robert Luskin, Robert Novak, Scooter Libby, The District, Tim Russert, Viveca NovakBattle-tested
Hillary Clinton fought the Republican attack machine, and emerged stronger
By Joseph C. Wilson IV
February 12, 2008
With the emergence of Sen. John McCain as the presumptive Republican nominee, the choice for the Democrats in the 2008 presidential election now shifts to who is best positioned to beat him, in what promises to be a more hard-fought campaign – and perhaps a nastier one – than Democrats anticipated.
Sen. Barack Obama’s promise of transformation and an end of partisan politics has its seductive appeal. The Bush-Cheney era, after all, has been punctuated by smear campaigns, character assassinations and ideological fervor.
Nobody dislikes such poisonous partisanship, especially in foreign policy, more than I do. I am one of very few Foreign Service officers to have served as ambassador in the administrations of both George H. W. Bush and Bill Clinton, yet I have spent the past four years fighting a concerted character assassination campaign orchestrated by the George W. Bush White House.
Sen. Hillary Clinton is one of the few who fully understood the stakes in that battle. Time and again, she reached out to my wife – outed CIA officer Valerie Plame Wilson – and me to remind us that as painful as the attacks were, we simply could not allow ourselves to be driven from the public square by bullying. Mrs. Clinton knew from experience, having spent the better part of the past 20 years fighting the Republican attack machine. She is a fighter.
But will Mr. Obama fight? His brief time on the national scene gives little comfort. Consider a February 2006 exchange of letters with Mr. McCain on the subject of ethics reform. The wrathful Mr. McCain accused Mr. Obama of being “disingenuous,” to which Mr. Obama meekly replied, “The fact that you have now questioned my sincerity and my desire to put aside politics for the public interest is regrettable but does not in any way diminish my deep respect for you.”
Mr. McCain was insultingly dismissive but successful in intimidating his inexperienced colleague. Thus, in his one known face-to-face encounter with Mr. McCain, Mr. Obama failed to stand his ground.
What gives us confidence that Mr. Obama will be stronger the next time he faces Mr. McCain, a seasoned political fighter with extensive national security credentials? Even more important, what special disadvantages does Mr. Obama carry into this contest on questions of national security?
How will Mr. Obama answer Mr. McCain about his careless remark about unilaterally bombing Pakistan – perhaps blowing up an already difficult relationship with a nuclear state threatened by Islamic extremists? How will Mr. Obama respond to charges made by the Kenyan government that his campaigning activities in Kenya in support of his distant cousin running for president there made him “a stooge” and constituted interference in the politics of an important and besieged ally in the war on terror?
How will he answer charges that his desire for unstructured personal summits without preconditions with a host of America’s adversaries, from Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to Kim Jong Il, would be little more than premature capitulation?
Contrary to the myth of the Obama campaign, 2008 is not the year for transcendental transformation. The task for the next administration will be to repair the damage done by eight years of radical rule. And the choice for Americans is clear: four more years of corrupt Republican rule, senseless wars, evisceration of the Constitution, emptying of the national treasury – or rebuilding our government and our national reputation, piece by piece.
In order to effect practical change against a determined adversary, we do not need a would-be philosopher-king but a seasoned gladiator who understands the fight Democrats will face in the fall campaign and in governing.
Theodore Roosevelt once said, “It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again … who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly.”
If he were around today, Roosevelt might be speaking of the woman in the arena. Hillary Clinton has been in that arena for a generation. She is one of the few to have defeated the attack machine that is today’s Republican Party and to have emerged stronger. She is deeply knowledgeable about governing; she made herself into a power in the Senate; she is respected by our military; and she never flinches. She has never been intimidated, not by any Republican – not even John McCain.
Barack Obama claims to represent the future, but it should be increasingly evident that he is not the man for this moment, especially with Mr. McCain’s arrival. We’ve seen a preview of that contest already. It was a TKO.
Former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV was in the Foreign Service for 23 years, and served in Iraq in the years leading up to the Persian Gulf war. He is the author of “The Politics of Truth.” His e-mail is jcwivwdc@yahoo.com.
Copyright © 2008, The Baltimore Sun
Bill Maher | February 8 2008 | HQ
Barack Obama, Democrats, Election 2008, GOP, Hillary Clinton, Karl Rove, Politics, ScaifeShady Businessman Gives Barack Obama More Cash Than He Admits
Barack Obama, Broadcatching, Chicago, Election 2008, Hillary Clinton, Journalism, Karl Rove, Obama, Politics, TullycastRezko cash triple what Obama says
DONATIONS | $168,000 traced to indicted businessman, associates over the years
June 18, 2007
During his 12 years in politics, Sen. Barack Obama has received nearly three times more campaign cash from indicted businessman Tony Rezko and his associates than he has publicly acknowledged, the Chicago Sun-Times has found.
Obama has collected at least $168,308 from Rezko and his circle. Obama also has taken in an unknown amount of money from people who attended fund-raising events hosted by Rezko since the mid-1990s.
Obama has collected at least $168,308 from Rezko and his circle. Obama also has taken in an unknown amount of money from people who attended fund-raising events hosted by Rezko since the mid-1990s.
But seven months ago, Obama told the Sun-Times his “best estimate” was that Rezko raised “between $50,000 and $60,000” during Obama’s political career.
But seven months ago, Obama told the Sun-Times his “best estimate” was that Rezko raised “between $50,000 and $60,000” during Obama’s political career.
Obama, who wants to be the nation’s next president, has been purging some of those donations — giving charities more than $30,000 he got from Rezko and three of his business partners referenced in Rezko’s federal indictments. All three attended a lavish fund-raiser Rezko hosted for Obama four years ago.
Obama, however, has kept $6,850 from others who also are referenced in Rezko’s indictments. Obama also has hung on to contributions from doctors whom Rezko helped appoint to a state-government panel involved in some of Rezko’s alleged fraud schemes.
“We’ve made our best effort to run the most ethical campaign possible in all ways and release donations when appropriate,” Obama’s press secretary, Bill Burton, said Friday.
Sticks by estimate
Burton said Obama can only estimate how much money Rezko has raised for him. Obama’s staff, he said, only knows of one fund-raiser Rezko hosted for Obama — a June 27, 2003, cocktail party at Rezko’s mansion.Sources close to both Rezko and Obama, however, said Rezko raised money often for Obama.
Burton said Friday the campaign was sticking by its original estimate that Rezko raised no more than $60,000.
The cocktail party Rezko hosted in 2003 came at a critical time for Obama. He and Rezko timed it to help Obama show he had enough money to compete in the Democratic primary for U.S. Senate against millionaire Blair Hull and state Comptroller Dan Hynes.
“This was discussed a lot. They wanted to have a good showing,” said a source familiar with the fund-raiser, speaking on condition of anonymity.
“Tony was one of the biggest fund-raisers.”
At the time of the party, the state was in the process of foreclosing on a low-income apartment building Rezko’s company rehabbed in Obama’s state Senate district — a rehab project on which Obama’s law firm worked. Rezko had also abandoned many other low-income apartments, leaving numerous vacant units in need of major repairs.
Rezko was indicted in October 2006 in unrelated fraud schemes.
Between 75 and 80 people attended Rezko’s cocktail party, according to Burton, but he said the campaign has no list of the guests.
More than half a dozen people who were there said between 100 and 150 guests were treated to an open bar and food served by Jewell Events Catering, run by renowned Chicago caterer George Jewell. Valets parked cars for the guests, who each were asked to donate at least $1,000.
Rezko picked up the tab. The exact cost of the party has never been disclosed to the Federal Election Commission, which allows hosts to pay up to $2,000 for fund-raisers held in their homes and not report the expense. If a party costs more than $2,000, the candidate must tell the FEC about it.
Burton said, based on a conversation a former Obama staff member had with Rezko, that the party didn’t cost more than $2,000.
Three days after the cocktail party, Obama got donations from several Rezko associates, Obama’s campaign records show.
Donations dumped
The donor list includes six people involved in the two federal indictments of Rezko. Obama earlier this month said he is donating to charity contributions totaling $22,000 from three of those people. Last year, he donated $11,500 in contributions from Rezko.Among those whose money Obama is now purging is Ali D. Ata, a former top official in Gov. Blagojevich’s administration. Ata was indicted last month for allegedly writing a letter — on a state letterhead — that contained false information. That letter allegedly helped Rezko fraudulently secure millions of dollars in loans.
Obama also is dumping donations by Rezko business partners Joseph Aramanda and Dr. Paul Ray, neither of whom has been charged in the Rezko cases.
Aramanda, sources said, is identified as “Individual D” in one of the Rezko indictments. He allegedly got a $250,000 fee “in substantial part for the benefit of Rezko” in a scheme involving the state’s teacher pension fund, the indictment states. Aramanda’s son once had an internship in Obama’s U.S. Senate office.
Ray is listed as “Investor 1” in another indictment, a title that stems from his ownership role in a Rezko fast-food business. Ray is not accused of wrongdoing.
While Obama has dumped the cash from Aramanda and Ray, he has kept a $3,000 donation from Michael Winter, whom sources have identified as “Individual G” in a Rezko indictment. Winter allegedly agreed to funnel a fee from an investment firm to Rezko and others as part of the teacher-pension scheme. He has not been charged.
Obama also has kept $2,850 from Anthony Abboud and $1,000 from Jack Carriglio, both attorneys. They haven’t been accused of any crime and aren’t named in the indictments against Rezko. But one indictment alleges that Rezko in May 2004 helped engineer the appointments of “two new members” to the teacher pension board who voted “on matters of interest to Rezko” and a co-defendant, Stuart Levine. Those members are Abboud and Carriglio, according to sources and records.
The donors either declined to comment or could not be reached.
Obama has been dogged by questions about Rezko since November, after it became known that Rezko played a role in the purchase of Obama’s house in Kenwood. Rezko’s wife, Rita, and Obama purchased adjoining lots on the same day in June 2005, and Rita Rezko later sold a strip of the land to Obama so he could expand his yard.
“We’ve made our best effort to run the most ethical campaign possible in all ways and release donations when appropriate.











MSNBC.com
